Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.
Open Access

THE ANALYSIS OF ENTERPRISE OPEN INNOVATION PLATFORM CONSTRUCTION AND MANAGEMENT MODE IN THE ERA OF DIGITAL ECONOMY

Download as PDF

Volume 1, Issue 1, Pp 36-40, 2024

DOI: 10.61784/ssm3007

Author(s)

Qian Liu

Affiliation(s)

School of Business Administration, Baise University, Baise 533000, Guangxi, China.

Corresponding Author

Qian Liu

ABSTRACT

This study aims to explore the construction and management models of enterprise open innovation platforms in the era of the digital economy and analyze their impact on innovation efficiency and outcomes. Through a literature review and theoretical analysis, the study summarizes the design principles, technological architecture, and management models of open innovation platforms. The results show that the construction of enterprise open innovation platforms relies on clear strategic positioning and scalable technological architecture. Successful platforms require a clear definition of participants' roles and partnerships to ensure synergy among innovation agents. The study concludes that data-driven management models and a balance between openness and control are crucial for the effective operation of the platform. This paper provides theoretical support and practical guidance for enterprises to implement innovation strategies in the context of the digital economy.

KEYWORDS

Open innovation; Digital economy; Platform construction; Management model; Data-driven; Innovation efficiency

CITE THIS PAPER

Qian Liu. The analysis of enterprise open innovation platform construction and management mode in the era of digital economy. Social Science and Management. 2024, 1(1): 36-40. DOI: 10.61784/ssm3007.

REFERENCES

[1] Chesbrough H. The logic of open innovation: managing intellectual property. Calif Manage Rev, 2003, 45(3): 33-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000812560304500301.

[2] West J, Bogers M. Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on open innovation. J Prod Innov Manag, 2014, 31(4): 814-831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12125.

[3] Dahlander L, Gann DM. How open is innovation?. Res Policy, 2010, 39(6): 699-709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013.

[4] Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A, et al. Digital innovation management. MIS Q, 2017, 41(1): 223-38.

[5] Chesbrough H, Brunswicker S. A fad or a phenomenon?: The adoption of open innovation practices in large firms. Res Technol Manag, 2014, 57(2): 16-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5702196.

[6] Pisano GP. The hard truth about innovation. Harv Bus Rev, 2019, (1): 62-71.

[7] Bogers M, Zobel AK, Afuah A, et al. The open innovation research landscape: Established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis. Ind Innov, 2017, 24(1): 8-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1240068.

[8] Von Hippel E. Democratizing innovation: the evolving phenomenon of user innovation. Int J Innov Sci, 2009, 1(1): 29-40.

[9] Wu P, Lan Z, Huang W, et al. Application of a blended teaching model based on MOOCs in undergraduate medical interns. J Youjiang Med Univ Natl, 2020, 42(1): 119-122.

[10] Nambisan S, Wright M, Feldman M. The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Res Policy, 2019, 48(8): 103773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018.

[11] Sedera D, Lokuge S, Grover V, et al. Innovating with enterprise systems and digital platforms: A contingent resource-based theory view. Inf Manag, 2016, 53(3): 366-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.01.001.

[12] Abbate T, Codini AP, Aquilani B. Knowledge co-creation in open innovation digital platforms: processes, tools and services. J Bus Ind Mark, 2019, 34(7): 1434-1447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-09-2018-0276.

[13] Pang X, Liu F, Li L, et al. A preliminary exploration of the reform of "General Practice Introduction" teaching under the concept of curriculum ideology and politics. J Youjiang Med Univ Natl, 2020, (06): 806-809.

[14] Cui X, Yang M. The impact of nursing interventions based on the Rosenthal effect on stress response and emotional states in children with scoliosis. J Youjiang Med Univ Natl, 2019, 41(06): 713-715.

[15] Huang N, Liu Y, Xu Z, et al. A study on the relationship between TCM syndrome differentiation of peptic ulcer in active phase, tongue diagnosis, and gastroscopic imaging. J Youjiang Med Univ Natl, 2018, 40(05): 466-468, 471.

[16] Wang M, Zhang R, Abdulwase R, et al. The construction of ecosystem and collaboration platform for enterprise open innovation. Front Psychol, 2022, 13: 935644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.935644.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. sitemap
Copyright © 2017 - 2024 Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.   All Rights Reserved.