A NUMERICAL STUDY ON THE LOWER BOUNDS OF THE CLASSICAL AND REFINED HEISENBERG UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLES

Authors

  • LuHao Yang Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, Heilongjiang, China.
  • QiZhi Zhang Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, Heilongjiang, China.
  • XueXin Li (Corresponding Author) Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, Heilongjiang, China.

Keywords:

Heisenberg uncertainty, Numerical comparison, Current density, Covariance term, Gaussian function

Abstract

In Fourier analysis and quantum mechanics, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle stands as a fundamental result. Its classical version provides a product lower bound for the variances of position and frequency. More recently, for vector-valued functions, Dang, Deng and Qian introduced an improved inequality featuring an extra covariance term derived from the current density. The present work performs a one-dimensional numerical comparison of the two lower bounds using four test functions: a pure Gaussian, an asymmetric sum of two Gaussians, a linear chirp, and a vector-valued signal with spatially separated orthogonal components. For the Gaussian, the covariance term vanishes up to machine precision, making the two bounds identical. For the asymmetric sum, the refined bound exceeds the classical one by about three percent. The chirp signal yields a dramatically larger refined bound, approximately sixteen times above the classical one. For the vector-valued case with each component a real Gaussian, the refined bound is about eight times higher. These numerical outcomes confirm the validity of the refined inequality and highlight the sensitivity of the covariance term to phase structure and vectorial coupling.

References

[1] Heisenberg W. Uber den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik. Zeitschrift fur Physik, 1927, 43(3-4): 172-198.

[2] Kennard E H. Zur Quantenmechanik einfacher Bewegungstypen. Zeitschrift fur Physik, 1927, 44(4-5): 326-352.

[3] Robertson H P. The uncertainty principle. Physical Review, 1929, 34(1): 163-164.

[4] Folland G B, Sitaram A. The uncertainty principle: a mathematical survey. Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications, 1997, 3(3): 207-238.

[5] Hardy G H. A theorem concerning Fourier transforms. Journal of the London Mathematical Society, 1933, 8(3): 227-231.

[6] Dang P, Deng G T, Qian T. A sharper uncertainty principle. Journal of Functional Analysis, 2013, 265(9): 2239-2266.

[7] Dang P, Qian T, Yang Y. Extra-strong uncertainty principles in relation to phase derivative for signals in Euclidean spaces. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 2016, 437(2): 912-940.

[8] Yang Y, Dang P, Qian T. Stronger uncertainty principles for hypercomplex signals. Complex Variables and Elliptic Equations, 2015, 60(12): 1696-1711.

[9] Yu H Y, Zheng S Z. Uncertainty principle based on Fourier transform (in Chinese). College Physics, 2024, 43(1): 1-5.

[10] Zhang Z, Shi X, Wu A, et al. Sharper N-D Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2021, 28: 1665-1669.

[11] Cohen L. Time-frequency analysis: theory and application. Prentice-Hall, 1995: 45-78.

[12] Cowling M, Escauriaza L, Kenig C, et al. The Hardy uncertainty principle revisited. Indiana University Mathematics Journal, 2016, 65(4): 1399-1421.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-16

How to Cite

LuHao Yang, QiZhi Zhang, XueXin Li. A Numerical Study On The Lower Bounds Of The Classical And Refined Heisenberg Uncertainty Principles. Eurasia Journal of Science and Technology. 2026, 8(2): 27-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/ejst3143.