MOTION COMPENSATION FOR OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY BASED ON MULTI-DIMENSIONAL MATRIX PENCIL METHOD AND ADAPTIVE EN-FACE IMAGE ENHANCEMENT

Authors

  • LinKang Du School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huai’an 223001, Jiangsu, China.
  • Lei Liu School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huai’an 223001, Jiangsu, China.
  • HaiYi Bian (Corresponding Author) School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huai’an 223001, Jiangsu, China.

Keywords:

Optical coherence tomography angiography, Multi-dimensional matrix pencil method, En-face image enhancement, Weighted layered projection, CLAHE, FAZ processing, Motion compensation, Retinal imaging

Abstract

This paper proposes a two-stage algorithm combining the multi-dimensional matrix pencil method (MDMP) with En-face image enhancement to address the problem of eye motion artifacts severely degrading image quality in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). In the first stage, a two-dimensional Hankel matrix pencil in the depth-time domain is constructed to jointly estimate Doppler frequency shifts and motion parameters of blood flow signals. The Centro-Hermitian property is exploited via unitary transformation to reduce computational complexity by approximately 75%, and an automatic parameter pairing mechanism is introduced to avoid mispairing problems inherent in conventional approaches. In the second stage, En-face image enhancement is applied to the MDMP-compensated retinal volume data, sequentially performing FFT difference calculation, weighted layered projection, CLAHE adaptive enhancement, column-wise median normalization for stripe removal, and FAZ region cosine gradient darkening to generate high-quality En-face vascular images. Experimental validation on a retinal OCTA dataset demonstrates that compared with multiple existing methods, the proposed method achieves a 65.1% improvement in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), an 80.2% improvement in contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), a structural similarity index (SSIM) of 0.94, and a 34.0% reduction in motion artifact index (MAI). The results confirm that the proposed two-stage algorithm effectively suppresses eye motion artifacts and significantly enhances OCTA En-face vascular imaging quality.

References

[1] Spaide RF, Fujimoto JG, Waheed NK, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, 2018, 64: 1-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.11.003.

[2] Kashani AH, Chen CL, Gahm JK, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography: A comprehensive review of current methods and clinical applications. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, 2017, 60: 66-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.07.002.

[3] Javed A, Khanna A, Palmer E, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography: a review of the current literature. Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology, 2023, 15: 1-16. DOI: 10.1177/03000605231187933.

[4] Chen CL, Wang RK. Optical coherence tomography based angiography. Biomedical Optics Express, 2017, 8(2): 1056-1082. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.8.001056.

[5] Li Y, Chen S, Ji L, et al. Intensity-differential optical coherence tomography angiography. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 2019, 24(6): 066003. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.24.6.066003.

[6] Anvari P, Ashrafkhorasani M, Habibi A, et al. Artifacts in Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research, 2021, 16(2): 271-286. DOI: 10.18502/jovr.v16i2.9091.

[7] Hormel TT, Huang D, Jia Y. Artifacts and artifact removal in optical coherence tomographic angiography. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery, 2021, 11(3): 1120-1133. DOI: 10.21037/qims-20-730.

[8] Camino A, Zhang M, Dongye C, et al. Automated registration and enhanced processing of clinical optical coherence tomography angiography. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery, 2016, 6(4): 391-401. DOI: 10.21037/qims.2016.07.02.

[9] Zhang M, Hwang TS, Campbell JP, et al. Projection-resolved optical coherence tomographic angiography. Biomedical Optics Express, 2016, 7(3): 816-828. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.7.000816.

[10] Wei X, Hormel TT, Guo Y, et al. High-resolution wide-field OCT angiography with a self-navigation method to correct microsaccades and blinks. Biomedical Optics Express, 2020, 11(6): 3234-3245. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.390801.

[11] Hossbach J, Husvogt L, Kraus MF, et al. Efficient and high accuracy 3-D OCT angiography motion correction in pathology. Biomedical Optics Express, 2021, 12(1): 974-989. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.411117.

[12] Li A, Du C, Pan Y. Deep-learning-based motion correction in optical coherence tomography angiography. Journal of Biophotonics, 2021, 14(12): e202100097. DOI: 10.1002/jbio.202100097.

[13] Li W, Yin H, Qin Z, et al. A multi-dimensional matrix pencil-based channel prediction method for massive MIMO with mobility. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 2023, 71(5): 2748-2762. DOI: 10.1109/TCOMM.2022.3214853.

[14] Sun Y, Ma Y, Zhao G, et al. An ASC-based unitary matrix pencil method for parameter estimation of group target. Radio Science, 2023, 58(7): e2022RS007649. DOI: 10.1029/2022RS007649.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-27

How to Cite

LinKang Du, Lei Liu, HaiYi Bian. Motion Compensation For Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Based On Multi-Dimensional Matrix Pencil Method And Adaptive En-Face Image Enhancement. Journal of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering. 2026, 8(2): 27-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/jcsee3124.