MODELING THE EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS OF SMARTPHONE BATTERY TIMING

Authors

  • MingGuang Jia (Corresponding Author) School of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210014, Jiangsu, China.

Keywords:

State of charge, Continuous-time modeling, Temporal evolution

Abstract

Addressing the complexity of smartphone battery life prediction, this study constructs a continuous-time dynamic model based on the law of energy conservation. The model defines the rate of change in battery state of charge as the ratio of total power consumption to effective capacity, which is influenced by temperature and aging. A first-order ordinary differential equation describes its evolution over time. Through physical modular modeling of core components—including the display, processor, network communication, and background applications—the study achieves a refined decomposition of total transient power. Parameters are calibrated using high-precision datasets, and numerical solutions are obtained via the fourth-order Runge-Kutta method. The resulting state-of-charge evolution curves exhibit smoothness and stable convergence, with locally truncated errors controlled at extremely low levels. Empirical analysis demonstrates the model's ability to accurately capture instantaneous power fluctuations triggered by user behavior transitions, revealing the dominant role of processor power consumption across different usage phases. This research establishes a robust physical foundation for achieving high-precision remaining power prediction and energy efficiency attribution analysis.

References

[1] González D F, Peris H D, Orpinell B G, et al. Modeling and impact assessment of hybrid battery–supercapacitor energy storage solutions for electric vehicles. Journal of Energy Storage, 2026, 152(PC): 120811-120811.

[2] Li X, Yu D, Vilsen B S, et al. Degradation analysis and tanks-in-series modeling of lithium-ion batteries with state of health-adaptive charging strategies. eTransportation, 2026, 28: 100561-100561.

[3] Bavithra R, Jaya J. Hybrid Optimization and Deep Graph-GRU Based Energy-Efficient Routing and Fault Prediction in WSNs for Smart Agriculture Applications. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Electrical Engineering, 2026(prepublish): 1-29.

[4] Khekare U, S I V R. LHO‐HLiB: Hybrid Lithium Battery Management System for Effective Charge–Discharge Management in Electric Vehicles. Energy Technology, 2026, 14(1): e202501015-e202501015.

[5] Gopal K R, Ma B, Bai P. Mapping Out Fast Charging Safe Limits for High-Loading Lithium-Ion Cells by High-Fidelity Operando Microscopy.. Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2026: e14619.

[6] Liu S, Li Y, Li S. Effective anode protection for zinc-ion batteries using a covalent–organic framework coating strategy. Electrochimica Acta, 2026, 551: 148191-148191.

[7] Radhakrishnan A, Prasad V R, Railis J D, et al. Enhancing thermal management in electric vehicles to improve performance and extend battery life using advanced cooling systems. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2026(prepublish): 1-20.

[8] Zhang Y, Sun Z, Cai C . Real-time adaptive hybrid energy management for hybrid-electric UAVs: Offline–online DP-ECMS collaborative strategy in low-altitude inspection. Franklin Open, 2026: 14100473-100473.

[9] Samal B K, Pati S, Sharma R. Power management using an improved EMS algorithm in a stand-alone hybrid PV-PEMFC microgrid with reduced converter count. Green Energy and Intelligent Transportation, 2026, 5(2): 100302-100302.

[10] Huang K, Zhang X, Guo Y, et al. Source domain selection with early-cycle features for transfer learning-based prediction of lithium-ion battery degradation trajectories. Energy, 2026, 344: 139928-139928.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-02

How to Cite

MingGuang Jia. Modeling The Evolutionary Dynamics Of Smartphone Battery Timing. Journal of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering. 2026, 8(2): 38-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/jcsee3126.