INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE UTILIZATION OF PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS FOR EVALUATING NEURODEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY

Authors

  • Karin Taxvig (Corresponding Author) Technical University of Denmark, 2800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.

Keywords:

Stem cells, Nerve, Neurodevelopment, Toxicity model

Abstract

Induced pluripotent stem cells are a cell type similar to embryonic stem cells obtained by inducing mature somatic cells to express specific genes [1]. Both iPSCs and ESCs have the ability of unlimited proliferation and multi-lineage differentiation in vitro, and both play important roles in drug screening, cell therapy, etc. However, iPSCs come from a wide range of sources and are easy to obtain, and their acquisition can avoid medical ethical issues. Traditional developmental toxicity research methods not only require a large number of experimental animals, but also have long experimental cycles, cumbersome operations, and species differences. In 1981, Evans and Kaufman [2] first obtained mouse ESCs from the inner cell mass of mouse blastocysts. In 1997, Spielmann et al. [3] established an in vitro alternative model "embryonic stem cell test" by using the characteristics of mouse ESCs to differentiate into the three germ layers, and it became a classic method for in vitro developmental toxicity research. Subsequently, human ESCs and human iPSCs were obtained and used in in vitro surrogate models of developmental toxicity. The application of these human cells solved the problem of species differences [4-6]. The in vitro developmental toxicity model was initially used to evaluate the toxic effects of chemicals through the differentiation of pluripotent stem cells into myocardium. Later, the products of differentiation into other lineages were gradually applied to this model.

References

[1] Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell, 2006, 126(4):663-676.

[2] Evans MJ, Kaufman MH. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature, 1981, 292(5819):154-156.

[3] Spielmann H, Pohl I, Doring B. The embryonic stem cell test (EST), an in vitro embryotoxicity test using two permanent mouse cell lines: 3T3 fibroblasts and embryonic stem cells. In Vitro Toxicol, 1997, 10(1):119-127.

[4] Aikawa N, Kunisato A, Nagao K. Detection of thalidomide embryotoxicity by in vitro embryotoxicity testing based on human iPS cells. J Pharmaco Sci, 2014, 124(2):201-207.

[5] Fang H, Zhi Y, Yu Z. The embryonic toxicity evaluation of deoxynivalenol (DON) by murine embryonic stem cell test and human embryonic stem cell test models. Food Control, 2018, 86:234-240.

[6] Luo S, Fang HQ, Yang H. Comparison of embryotoxicity of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate using mouse and human embryonic stem cell test models in vitro. Chin J Prev Med, 2016, 50(7):645-651. (in Chinese)

[7] Rice D, Barone SJ. Critical periods of vulnerability for the developing nervous system: evidence from humans and animal models. Environ Health Perspect, 2000, 108 Suppl 3:511-533.

[8] Kraft AD, Aschner M, Cory-Slechta DA. Unmasking silent neurotoxicity following developmental exposure to environmental toxicants. Neurotoxicol Teratol, 2016, 55:38-44.

[9] Grandjean P, Landrigan PJ. Neurobehavioural effects of developmental toxicity. Lancet Neurol, 2014, 13(3):330-338.

[10] Yi H, Xie B, Liu B. Derivation and identification of motor neurons from human urine-derived induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells Int, 2018, 2018:3628578.

[11] Santos DP, Kiskinis E. Generation of spinal motor neurons from human pluripotent stem cells. Methods Mol Biol, 2017, 1538:53-66.

[12] Datta I, Ganapathy K, Tattikota SM. Directed differentiation of human embryonic stem cell-line HUES9 to dopaminergic neurons in a serum-free defined culture niche. Cell Biol Int, 2013, 37(1):54-64.

[13] Kawasaki H, Mizuseki K, Nishikawa S. Induction of midbrain dopaminergic neurons from ES cells by stromal cell-derived inducing activity. Neuron, 2000, 28(1):31-40.

[14] Hu Y, Qu ZY, Cao SY. Directed differentiation of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons from human pluripotent stem cells. J Neurosci Methods, 2016, 266:42-49.

[15] Vazin T, Ball K A, Lu H. Efficient derivation of cortical glutamatergic neurons from human pluripotent stem cells: a model system to study neurotoxicity in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Dis, 2014, 62:62-72.

[16] Pei Y, Peng J, Behl M. Comparative neurotoxicity screening in human iPSC-derived neural stem cells, neurons and astrocytes. Brain Res, 2016, 1638(PtA):57-73.

[17] Bian J, Zheng J, Li S. Sequential differentiation of embryonic stem cells into neural epithelial-like stem cells and oligodendrocyte progenitor cells. PLoS One, 2016, 11(5):e155227.

[18] Arber C, Precious SV, Cambray S. Activin A directs striatal projection neuron differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells. Development, 2015, 142(7):1375-1386.

[19] Reichman S, Slembrouck A, Gagliardi G. Generation of storable retinal organoids and retinal pigmented epithelium from adherent human iPS cells in Xeno-free and feeder-free conditions. Stem Cells, 2017, 35(5):1176-1188.

[20] Matsuoka AJ, Morrissey ZD, Zhang C. Directed differentiation of human embryonic stem cells toward placode-derived spiral ganglion-like sensory neurons. Stem Cells Transl Med, 2017, 6(3): 923-936.

[21] Pamies D, Barreras P, Block K. A human brain microphysiological system derived from induced pluripotent stem cells to study neurological diseases and toxicity. ALTEX, 2017, 34(3):362-376.

[22] Schwartz MP, Hou Z, Propson NE. Human pluripotent stem cell-derived neural constructs for predicting neural toxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U SA, 2015, 112(40):12516-12521.

[23] Druwe I, Freudenrich TM, Wallace K. Sensitivity of neuroprogenitor cells to chemical-induced apoptosis using a multiplexed assay suitable for high-throughput screening. Toxicology, 2015, 333:14-24.

[24] Tiwari SK, Agarwal S, Chauhan LK. Bisphenol-A impairs myelination potential during development in the hippocampus of the rat brain. Mol Neurobiol, 2015, 51(3):1395-1416.

[25] Visan A, Hayess K, Sittner D. Neural differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells as a tool to assess developmental neurotoxicity in vitro. Neurotoxicology, 2012, 33(5):1135-1146.

[26] Guan S, Xu J, Guo Y. Pyrroloquinoline quinone against glutamate-induced neurotoxicity in cultured neural stem and progenitor cells. Int J Dev Neurosci, 2015, 42:37-45.

[27] Augustyniak J, Lenart J, Zychowicz M. Sensitivity of hiPSC- derived neural stem cells (NSC) to Pyrroloquinoline quinone depends on their developmental stage. Toxicol In Vitro, 2017, 45(Pt 3):434-444.

[28] Menzner AK, Gilbert D

Downloads

Published

2024-01-01

How to Cite

Taxvig, K. (2024). Investigations Into The Utilization Of Pluripotent Stem Cells For Evaluating Neurodevelopmental Toxicity. Eurasia Journal of Science and Technology, 6(2), 11-15. https://doi.org/10.61784/jpmrv6n219