WHAT DRIVES THE EFFICIENCY OF GREEN TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION IN INDUSTRIAL SECTORS? AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE TOE FRAMEWORK USING NCA AND FSQCA
Keywords:
Green technology innovation efficiency, TOE framework, Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), Necessary condition analysis (NCA), Configurational analysisAbstract
As the nexus of the "innovation-driven" and "green development" national strategies, green technology innovation resonates with China's dual carbon targets and represents an essential pathway toward achieving high-quality development. Existing literature has seldom employed a holistic framework to investigate the complex causal mechanisms through which technological, organizational, and environmental conditions influence green technology innovation efficiency, thereby largely overlooking the configurational effects among these antecedent conditions. To further advance green technology innovation and enhance its efficiency, this study examines China's industrial sectors. Drawing on the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework, we utilize both Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA) and fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) on a sample of 38 industrial sectors above a designated size. The analysis explores how six antecedent conditions across the technological, organizational, and environmental dimensions combine to impact green technology innovation. The findings are threefold. First, no single antecedent condition is necessary for achieving high green technology innovation efficiency, although technological factors exert a relatively strong constraint. Second, three distinct configurational pathways lead to high efficiency: a "technology-led, government-supported" path, a "technology-led, independent-innovation" path, and an "environment-technology-organization synergy" path. Third, in an otherwise favorable market environment, ill-suited environmental regulations can suppress innovation efficiency, a context where even strong market demand fails to be effective, suggesting that the impact of organizational conditions is subject to a threshold.References
[1] Si Lijuan. The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Green Technology Innovation: An Empirical Analysis Based on Panel Data of Cities in the Yellow River Basin. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 2020(07): 41-49.
[2] Brawn E, Wield D. Regulation as a means for the social control of technology. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 1994, 6(1): 31-46. DOI: 10.1080/09537329408524151.
[3] Luo Qiaoling, Miao Chenglin, Sun Liyan, et al. Efficiency evaluation of green technology innovation of China's strategic emerging industries: An empirical analysis based on Malmquist-data envelopment analysis index. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 238: 118712. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118712.
[4] Shu C, Zhou K Z, Xiao Y, et al. How green management influences product innovation in China: The role of institutional benefits. Journal of Business Ethics, 2016, 133(3): 471-485. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2520-8.
[5] Cheng Qiongwen, He Xianxiang, Li Baosheng. Green technology innovation efficiency and its influencing factors: An empirical study based on 35 industrial industries in China. Journal of Central South University (Social Science Edition), 2020, 26(02): 97-107.
[6] Qu Yanfen, Yu Chuqi. Industrial Agglomeration Diversification, Specialization and Green Technology Innovation Efficiency of Enterprises. Ecological Economy, 2021, 37(02): 61-67.
[7] Luo Liangwen, Liang Shengrong. Green Technology Innovation Efficiency and Factor Decomposition of China's Regional Industrial Enterprises. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2016, 26(09): 149-157. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2016.09.020.
[8] Liang Zhong, Ang Hao. The Evolution of China's Green Technology Innovation Efficiency and Its Spatial Governance. Journal of Finance and Trade Research, 2019, 30(08): 16-25+63.
[9] Wang Zhiping, Tao Changqi, Shen Pengyi. Research on Regional Green Technology Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors Based on Ecological Footprint. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2014, 24(01): 35-40. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2014.01.006.
[10] Cheng Qiongwen, He Xianxiang, Li Baosheng. Green technology innovation efficiency and its influencing factors: An empirical study based on 35 industrial industries in China. Journal of Central South University (Social Science Edition), 2020, 26(2): 97-107.
[11] Li Danqing, Zhong Chenlin. Measurement and Influencing Factors of Green Technology Innovation Efficiency of Industrial Enterprises Based on DEA-Tobit Model: Taking Hubei Province as an Example. Journal of Shanghai Economic Management College, 2021, 19(06): 30-41.
[12] Wang Wan, Qin Yigen. Research on the Promotion Path of Regional Green Technology Innovation Efficiency from the Perspective of Quadruple Helix: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of 30 Provinces in China. Science and Technology Management Research, 2023, 43(01): 206-214. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2023.01.026.
[13] Jia Jianfeng, Liu Weipeng, Du Yunzhou, et al. Multiple Paths for Improving the Efficiency of Green Technology Innovation from the Perspective of Institutional Configuration. Nankai Business Review, 2023, 26(04): 102-118.
[14] Wang Shaohua, Lin Xiaoying, Zhang Wei, et al. Research on the Impact of Green Credit on the Efficiency of Industrial Green Technology Innovation in China. Statistics & Information Forum, 2023, 38(04): 88-102..
[15] Yu Ping, Xu Zhiqi. The Impact of Digital New Infrastructure on the Efficiency of Green Technology Innovation in Strategic Emerging Industries. Industrial Technology & Economy, 2023, 42(01): 62-70.
[16] Xu Yingqi, Cheng Yu, Wang Jingjing. Spatiotemporal Evolution of Carbon Emission Efficiency and the Impact of Green Technology Innovation in China's Resource-based Cities. Geographical Research, 2023, 42(03): 878-894.
[17] Yan Huafei, Xiao Jing, Feng Bing. Environmental Regulation, Foreign Direct Investment and Industrial Green Technology Innovation Efficiency: An Empirical Study Based on the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Statistics & Decision, 2022, 38(16): 118-122.
[18] Gao Guangkuo, Wang Yiqun. Analysis on Green Innovation Efficiency and Influencing Factors of High-energy-consuming Industries in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region: An Empirical Study from a Spatial Perspective. Industrial Technology & Economy, 2018, 37(01): 137-144.
[19] Tian Yapeng, Liu Xiaoyi. Evaluation of Regional Green Development Efficiency Based on Super-efficiency SBM-DEA and Spatial Analysis. Statistics & Information Forum, 2021, 36(08): 56-65. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3116.2021.08.006.
[20] Tone K. A Slacks-Based Measure of Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 130(3): 498-509. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5.
[21] Tone K. A Slacks-Based Measure of Super-efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 143(1): 32-41. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00324-1.
[22] Ragin C C. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226702797.001.0001.
[23] Du Yunzhou, Jia Liangding. Configurational Perspective and Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): A New Path for Management Research. Management World, 2017(06): 155-167.
[24] Du Yunzhou, Liu Qiuchen, Cheng Jianqing. What Kind of Business Environment Ecology Produces High Urban Entrepreneurial Activity? An Analysis Based on Institutional Configuration. Management World, 2020, 36(09): 141-155.
[25] Qian Li, Xiao Renqiao, Chen Zhongwei. Research on the Green Technology Innovation Efficiency and Regional Differences of China's Industrial Enterprises: Based on Common Frontier Theory and DEA Model. Economic Theory and Business Management, 2015(01): 26-43.
[26] Yang Shidi, Liu Yajun. Can China's Outward Direct Investment Improv