THE IMPACT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ON ENTERPRISE INCOME DISTRIBUTION

Authors

  • Jiang Zhan (Corresponding Author) School of Finance, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou 510320, Guangdong, China.
  • JianHeng Ye School of Finance, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou 510320, Guangdong, China.
  • GuoFeng Liang School of Finance, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou 510320, Guangdong, China.
  • FanRong Feng School of Finance, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou 510320, Guangdong, China.

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, Financing constraints, Income distribution structure

Abstract

As the most representative general technology at present, artificial intelligence is profoundly reshaping the organizational form, operating model and operating mechanism of enterprises, and bringing unprecedented impact to the income distribution structure within enterprises. Therefore, based on the panel data of China's Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share non-financial listed companies from 2010 to 2022, this paper explores whether the development of AI will trigger new changes in the interest pattern between corporate profits and labor compensation. Based on basic theories such as capital-labor substitution principle and factor reward theory, this paper explores how AI can promote enterprises to adopt different income distribution modes by improving marginal output of capital and substituting low-skilled labor from the perspective of technology bias. At the same time, the key factor of financing constraint is considered to hinder the enterprise's choice of technology level, which leads to the change of its corresponding distribution effect. Finally, the group regression is carried out from the two perspectives of the ownership structure and the industry to find the different responses of different types of enterprises to the income distribution changes brought by this new technology. This study attempts to outline the basic picture of the evolution of enterprise income distribution mechanism in the era of artificial intelligence, and also provides certain theoretical support and practical evidence for coordinating the relationship between technological innovation process and social distribution justice.

References

[1] Nguyen D C, Ding M, Pathirana P N, et al. 6G Internet of Things: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2022, 9(1): 359-383. DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2021.3103320.

[2] Arkadiusz S, Michał Ż. Analysis of artificial intelligence and automation and robotisation of processes as factors influencing structural changes in employment in industrial production. Współczesna Gospodarka, 2019, 10(1): 9-20.

[3] Ai Q Q, Yan X. Technological innovation and the labor income share of firms: Micro evidence from listed companies. Journal of Shanghai Business College, 2024, 25(6): 31-46.

[4] Deng F, Mao Z. The asymmetric effect of dual innovation on labor income share. East China Economic Management, 2024, 38(10): 83-95.

[5] Deng S, Yang D. Transformation of behavioral public management measurement driven by big data and artificial intelligence: Characteristics, path and complexity. E-government, 2025: 1-10.

[6] Feng J, Yuan C. The impact of artificial intelligence applications on corporate labor productivity. Journal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies, 2025, 17(1): 33-37.

[7] Gieselmann M, Erdsiek D, Rost V, et al. Do managers accept artificial intelligence? Insights into the role of business area and AI functionality. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2025, 108: 102804.

[8] Gong L Z. Artificial intelligence, aging and fiscal sustainability: Theoretical analysis and prospects. Journal of Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, 2025, 41(2): 63-75.

[9] Hao D, Liu W. The impact and mechanism of enterprise digital transformation on common prosperity: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies. Rural Finance Research, 2024(12): 67-80.

[10] Hu Y, Dong H, Tang R. Digital transformation, resource allocation efficiency and co-prosperity within enterprises. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology (Social Sciences), 2024, 38(9): 77-93.

[11] Huang Y, Huang B, Huang Y, et al. Research hotspot and trend analysis of urban green space evolution based on CiteSpace. Intelligent Buildings and Wisdom City, 2025(3): 38-40.

[12] He Z, Cui X H, Guo J, et al. The dilemma of mathematical intelligence literacy improvement of graduate students majoring in economics and management in the digital economy era. Zhongguancun, 2025(1): 183-185.

[13] Liu S. The impact of artificial intelligence technology on supply chain resilience of automobile manufacturing enterprises. Chinese Circulation Economy, 2025: 1-15.

[14] Lu C, Fang Z. The impact of customers’ digital technology innovation on suppliers’ carbon emissions: The transmission mechanism of supply chain capital and innovation double spillover. Western Forum, 2025, 35(1): 84-96.

[15] Liu B, Tu Z. Does the digital economy promote balanced development? An empirical study based on the development differences of 287 prefecture-level cities in various fields. Journal of Southeast University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 26(5): 77-90+149.

[16] Li Y, Gao S. Artificial intelligence and enterprise labor income share: A quasi-natural experiment based on the pilot of a new generation of artificial intelligence innovation development pilot zone. Industrial Technical Economics, 2024, 43(7): 120-130.

[17] Ma Y, Li X, Chen W. Does the technological competitiveness of peers affect the labor income share of firms? Nankai Economic Research, 2024(11): 177-194.

[18] Zhao M, Fu X, Sun J, et al. Optimal strategy of artificial intelligence on low-carbon energy transformation: Perspective from enterprise green technology innovation efficiency. Energy, 2025, 319: 135035.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-25

Issue

Section

Research Article

DOI:

How to Cite

Jiang Zhan, JianHeng Ye, GuoFeng Liang, FanRong Feng. The Impact Of Artificial Intelligence On Enterprise Income Distribution. Social Science and Management. 2026, 3(1): 79-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/ssm3083.