THE SOCIAL ENCODING MECHANISM OF WELL-BEING: A CATEGORICAL TRANSITION FROM PSYCHOLOGICAL INDICATORS TO CULTURAL DISCIPLINARY REGIMES

Authors

  • ZhenYu Zhao School of Management, Guangzhou Huashang College, Guangzhou 511300, Guangdong, China.
  • AiLi Xie (Corresponding Author) School of Management, Guangzhou Huashang College, Guangzhou 511300, Guangdong, China.
  • Ran Liu School of Management, Guangzhou Huashang College, Guangzhou 511300, Guangdong, China.

Keywords:

Happiness, Social coding mechanism, Cultural discipline, Social governance

Abstract

This study investigates the social encoding mechanisms of happiness, analyzing the paradigm shift from psychological metrics to cultural norms. Through historical tracing, it reveals how the concept of "happiness" has evolved—from ancient philosophical ethical ideals to modern psychological quantification, and ultimately to technical standardized measurements in global governance. The measurement mech, This paper critically examines the measurement systems of happiness, revealing how they not only reduce the diversity of individual emotions but also reinforce mechanisms of inequality and exclusion within social structures. The study further explores the institutionalization pathways of "happiness," introducing the concept of "happiness justice." It advocates for reconstructing the social significance of happiness through critical and pluralistic perspectives, while calling for breaking free from the limitations of existing measurement frameworks to drive reflective reconstruction of both the concept and measurement systems of happiness.

References

[1] Brandmeyer T, Delorme A. Meditation and the wandering mind: A theoretical framework of underlying neurocognitive mechanisms. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2021, 16(1): 39-66.

[2] Diener E, Emmons R A, Larsen R J, et al. The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1985, 49(1): 71-75.

[3] Briker R, Hohmann S, Walter F. A dyadic approach toward the interpersonal consequences of time pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2021, 27(3): 546-562.

[4] Kahneman D, Krueger A B. Developments in the Measurement of Subjective Well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2006, 20(1): 3-24.

[5] Helliwell J, Layard R, Sachs J, eds. World Happiness Reports. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network, 2012-2024.

[6] Zhang Xudong. Political Happiness and the China Model. Open Era, 2020(1): 14-33.

[7] Tian Liu, Li Yumei, Feng Jingyu. The Changing Trends of Chinese Citizens' Subjective Well-being and Its Distribution—— with a Discussion on Whether China Experiences a Happiness Paradox. Labor Economics Research, 2024, 12(06): 70-100.

[8] Ahmed S. The Promise of Happiness. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010.

[9] He Qizhi, Kao Jiaqi, Liu Yanhu. Statistical Measurement and Temporal-Spatial Evolution Characteristics of Residents' Happiness Index. Journal of Anhui University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 49(04): 117-129.

[10] Cieslik M. Not smiling but frowning: Sociology and the ‘problem’ of happiness. Sociology, 2015, 49(3): 422-437.

[11] An Qin, Zhang Wei. Social Comparison Tendency and Subjective Well-being: The Role of Relative Deprivation and Self-Concept Clarity. China Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2025, 33(02): 315-319.

[12] Zhang Jing. Measured Happiness: A Knowledge Spectrum of Subjective Well-being Research. Social Science, 2013(1): 1-25.

[13] Pang Ying. From "Self-Report" to "Social Command": A Critical Analysis of Subjective Well-being Discourse. Sociology Research, 2017(5): 65-89.

[14] Rose N. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

[15] Christopher J C, Hickinbottom S. Positive psychology, ethnocentrism, and the disguised ideology of individualism. Theory & Psychology, 2008, 18(5): 563-589.

[16] Donald J N, Bradshaw E L, Ryan R M, et al. Mindfulness and its association with varied types of motivation: A systematic review and meta-analysis using self-determination theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2020, 46(7): 1121-1138.

[17] Pang Ying. The Governance Logic and Discipline Mechanism of Happiness. Sociology Research, 2017, 32(2): 99-119.

[18] Arslan Ü, Asıcı E. The mediating role of solution focused thinking in relation between mindfulness and psychological well-being in university students. Current Psychology, 2022, 41(11): 8052-8061.

[19] Cieslik M. Not Smiling But Frowning: Sociology and the ‘Problem of Happiness’. Sociological Research Online, 2015, 20(1): 1-14.

[20] He Xuefeng. State and Society: An Ideological Critique of Well-being Indicators. Exploration and Controversy, 2012(10): 1-5.

[21] Zhang Xudong. The Cultural Logic of Happy Politics: A Case Study of the World Happiness Report. Culture & Society, 2020(6): 118-125.

[22] Yu Guoliang, Wei Qingwang. A New Interpretation of Social and Mental Health: Perspectives on Social Well-being. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), 2025(02): 72-81.

[23] Fossas A. Psychological maturity predicts different forms of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2019, 20(6): 1933-1952.

[24] Illouz E. Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007.

[25] Zhang Jing. The Power of Indicators: A Cultural Sociological Examination. Open Era, 2013(5): 74-87.

[26] Sointu E. The rise of an ideal: Tracing changing discourses of well-being. The Sociological Review, 2005, 53(2): 255-274.

[27] Yang Congcong, Li Xuexin, Zhang Nan. Research on the Impact of Happiness-Driven Impulse Buying on Consumer Well-being. Journal of Northeastern University (Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 27(01): 76-87.

[28] Binkley S. Happiness, Positive Psychology and the Program of Neoliberal Governmentality. Subjectivity, 2014, 7(4): 371-394.

[29] Cabanas E, Illouz E. Manufacturing Happy Citizens: How the Science and Industry of Happiness Control Our Lives. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2019.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-01

Issue

Section

Research Article

DOI:

How to Cite

ZhenYu Zhao, AiLi Xie, Ran Liu. The Social Encoding Mechanism Of Well-Being: A Categorical Transition From Psychological Indicators To Cultural Disciplinary Regimes. Social Science and Management. 2026, 3(2): 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/ssm3084.