ATTITUDES AND SOCIAL RESEARCH DISPOSITION AMONG ACADEMIC IN NIGERIA
Keywords:
Flexible, Inflexible, Disposition, Comparative registry and researchAbstract
An empirical study on attitudes and social research disposition among academics (lecturers) in Nigeria was carried out to find out the impacts of attitudes on levels of disposition to social research among academics. The objectives of this study are to; analyze the impacts of flexible attitudes on academics; examine the impacts of inflexible attitudes on academics; and find out the level of impact differences among academics. Two hypothetical statements were made which are, (i) there will be a significant difference between the impacts of flexible attitudes and inflexible attitudes among academics, and (ii) academics with flexible attitudes will have a high level of disposition to social research. A survey design was used to carry out the study in which a sample was drawn from the population of the study through a simple random sampling technique. A total of 200 respondents were given a questionnaire of 30 items to elicit their responses. Four institutions of higher learning were involved: Lagos State University, Adeniran Ogunsanya University of Education, Yaba College of Technology, and the University of Lagos. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze data from the respondents' findings the results of the data analysis show that respondents from Yabatech (X 3 ) and AQUE (X 2 ) and more homogenous than the respondents from LASY (X 1 ) and Unilag (X 4 ) who are heterogeneous. More respondents have inflexible attitudes than others who have flexible attitudes. In all only about 25% of the lecturers are disposed to social research meaning that the majority of the lecturers are not research-oriented. There are significant differences between the impacts of flexible and inflexible attitudes among academics. The staff of Yaba College of Technology are more disposed to social research than their colleagues from other institutions. Consideration of participant size and the number of institutions will be of high value for research on dispensation to social research and the impacts of attitudes.References
[1] Creswell JD, Way BM. Eisenberg N I, et al. Neural correlates of dispositional mindfulness during affect labeling. Psychosomatic Medicine, 2007, 69: 560 – 565.
[2] Fredrickson Bl, Losada M F. Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. American Psychologist, 2005, 60: 678 – 687.
[3] Csiks Zentmhalyi M. Flows: The psychology of optimal experience. Harpear Row; New York, 1990.
[4] Vallerand R J. On obsessive and harmonious passion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 2003, 85: 756 – 767.
[5] Nolen – Hoeksema S, Wisco BF, Lyubomirky S. Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2008, 3: 400 – 424.
[6] McDonnell S, Semkovska M. Resilience as a mediator between extraversion, neuroticism and depressive symptoms in University Students. Journal of Positive Psychology and Well-being, 2020, 4(1): 26-40.
[7] Levine C. The concept of vulnerability in disaster research. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 2004, 17(5): 395-402.
[8] Cox B J, Enns M W, Walker JR, et al. Psychological vulnerabilities in patients with major depression vs. panic disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2001.
[9] Satici S A, Kayis A R, Akin A. A Predictive role of authenticity on psychological vulnerability in Turkish university students. Psychological Reports, 2013, 112(2): 519-528.
[10] Shenk C E, Putnam F W, Rausch T R, et al. A longitudinal study of several potential mediators of the relationship between child maltreatment and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms. Development and Psychopathology, 2014, 26(1): 81-91.
[11] Akin U. The predictive role of self-compassion on psychological vulnerability in Turkish University Students International Journal of Social Sciences and Education, 2014, 3: 693-701.
[12] Gruebnerg O, Lowe S R, Sampson L, et al. The geography of post-disaster mental health, spatial patterning of psychological vulnerability and resilience factors in New York City after Hurricane Sandy. International Journal of Health Geographics, 2015, 14 (1): 16.
[13] Kiamarsi A, Abalghasem A. The relationship of procrastination and self–efficacy with psychological vulnerability in students. Procedia – social and behavioral Sciences, 2014, 124; 858 – 862.
[14] Bond F W, Hayes S C, Baer R A, et al. Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the Acceptance and Questionnaire _ii: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experimental avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 2011, 42(4):676-688.
[15] Rottenberg J. Control in depression: A critical analysis. Biological Psychology, 2007, 4: 200– 211.