VISION-GUIDED SECONDARY-PATH MODEL UPDATING FOR PLAYBACK-REFERENCED ACTIVE HEADREST NOISE CONTROL

Authors

  • XuDong Wu College of Automotive and Energy Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China.
  • Cong Zhang (Corresponding Author) College of Automotive and Energy Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China.
  • JiaXing Luo College of Automotive and Energy Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China.
  • ZeXiong Zhang College of Automotive and Energy Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China.

Keywords:

Active headrest, Active noise control, Playback-referenced control, Secondary-path model updating, Vision-guided ear tracking

Abstract

Time-varying secondary paths induced by head motion can introduce filtered-x mismatch and degrade the stability margin and usable attenuation bandwidth of active headrest noise control. This article proposes a vision-guided secondary-path model updating method for playback-referenced active headrest noise control. A monocular camera provides latency-compensated three-dimensional ear positions, from which ear–loudspeaker distances are estimated to update the internal secondary-path models through an equivalent delay shift and amplitude scaling of nominal impulse responses. The updated models are injected into filtered-x generation and normalised adaptation, while the underlying controller structure remains unchanged. To evaluate the proposed method under controlled dynamic conditions, a synchronised offline replay protocol is adopted, in which the electrical playback reference and binaural error signals are logged under a common hardware clock and replayed for repeatable comparisons. Experiments on a semi-anechoic active headrest platform in the 80–800 Hz band with a 3 dB criterion show that the proposed update enlarges the maximum stable step size by 67%–300% and improves attenuation continuity, yielding a median threshold-bandwidth gain of approximately 10–90 Hz depending on the condition.

References

[1] Elliott S J, Nelson P A. Active noise control. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 1993, 10(4): 12-35.

[2] Elliott S J. Signal Processing for Active Control. London, U.K. Academic Press, 2001.

[3] Lu L, Yin K L, de Lamare R C, et al. A survey on active noise control in the past decade-Part I: Linear systems. Signal Processing, 2021, 183: 108039. DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2021.108039.

[4] Hu M, Xue J, Lu J. Online multi-channel secondary path modeling in active noise control without auxiliary noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2019, 146(4): 2590-2595. DOI: 10.1121/1.5129380.

[5] Im S, Kim S, Woo S, et al. Deep learning-assisted active noise control in a time-varying environment. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2023, 37(3): 1189-1196. DOI: 10.1007/s12206-023-0206-2.

[6] Ma Y, Xiao Y, Ma L, et al. A robust feedforward hybrid active noise control system with online secondary-path modelling. IET Signal Processing, 2023, 17(1): e12183. DOI: 10.1049/sil2.12183.

[7] Oh J Y, Jung H W, Lee M H, et al. Enhancing active noise control of road noise using deep neural network to update secondary path estimate in real time. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2024, 206: 110940. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110940.

[8] Elliott S J, Jung W, Cheer J. Head tracking extends local active control of broadband sound to higher frequencies. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8: 5403. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-23531-y.

[9] Jung W, Elliott S J, Cheer J. Combining the remote microphone technique with head-tracking for local active sound control. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2017, 142(1): 298-307. DOI: 10.1121/1.4994292.

[10] Lai C K, Cheer J, Shi C. The effect of head-tracking resolution on the stability and performance of a local active noise control headrest system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2025, 157(2): 766-777. DOI: 10.1121/10.0035576.

[11] Veronesi F, Lai C K, Cheer J. Interpolation between plant responses in a head-tracked local active noise control headrest system. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2025, 240: 113401. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2025.113401.

[12] Jung W, Elliott S J, Cheer J. Local active control of road noise inside a vehicle. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2019, 121: 144-157. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.11.003.

[13] Karthik M L N S, Pradhan S, George N V. Performance evaluation of an active headrest system using a filtered-x least mean square/fourth algorithm with virtual sensing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2023, 154(5): 2878-2891. DOI: 10.1121/10.0022329.

[14] Liu Y, Li H, Zou H, et al. Active headrest combined with a depth camera-based ear-positioning system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2025, 157(1): 519-526. DOI: 10.1121/10.0034860.

[15] Zhang Z, Wu M, Yin L, et al. Robust parallel virtual sensing method for feedback active noise control in a headrest. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2022, 178: 109293. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109293.

[16] Samarasinghe P N, Zhang W, Abhayapala T D. Recent advances in active noise control inside automobile cabins: Toward quieter cars. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2016, 33(6): 61-73. DOI: 10.1109/MSP.2016.2601942.

[17] Jiang H, Chen H, Tao J, et al. Accuracy requirements of ear-positioning for active control of road noise in a car. Applied Acoustics, 2024, 225: 110164. DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2024.110164.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-23

Issue

Section

Research Article

DOI:

How to Cite

XuDong Wu, Cong Zhang, JiaXing Luo, ZeXiong Zhang. Vision-Guided Secondary-Path Model Updating For Playback-Referenced Active Headrest Noise Control. World Journal of Engineering Research. 2026, 4(2): 7-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wjer3083.