REFORM AND PRACTICE OF TALENT CULTIVATION IN THE CIVIL AVIATION TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM UNDER THE FRAMEWORK OF EMERGING ENGINEERING EDUCATION
Keywords:
Emerging Engineering Education, Civil aviation transportation, Industry–education integrationAbstract
The development of smart civil aviation, the rapid growth of the low-altitude economy, and the new round of scientific and technological revolution have brought new requirements for talent cultivation in civil aviation transportation programs. In response to existing problems in traditional training models, including insufficient industry–education integration, delayed curriculum updating, weak alignment between practical teaching and real operational scenarios, and an incomplete closed-loop quality evaluation mechanism, this study explores the reform of talent cultivation for civil aviation transportation under the framework of Emerging Engineering Education. Guided by an industry-oriented philosophy, the reform aims to cultivate applied talents who understand aviation operations, possess strong practical competence, demonstrate innovation capability, and uphold a strong awareness of safety. Accordingly, a cultivation framework characterized by strategic guidance, industry–education integration, digital and intelligent empowerment, and continuous improvement is constructed. Reform practices are implemented through the reconstruction of training objectives, optimization of the curriculum system, development of virtual simulation and full-mission simulation platforms, promotion of collaborative education by dual-qualified teaching teams, and improvement of competence-based achievement evaluation. This reform framework provides a systematic pathway for aligning program development, curriculum renewal, practical teaching, and competency evaluation, and offers a useful reference for talent cultivation reform in transportation-related programs at civil aviation-oriented universities under Emerging Engineering Education.References
[1] Fudan Consensus on emerging engineering education construction. Research in Higher Education of Engineering, 2017(01): 10-11.
[2] Action route for emerging engineering education construction: “Tianjin University Action”. Research in Higher Education of Engineering, 2017(02): 24-25.
[3] Guidelines for emerging engineering education construction: “Beijing Guide”. Research in Higher Education of Engineering, 2017(04): 20-21.
[4] Zhong Denghua. Connotations and actions for establishing emerging engineering education. Research in Higher Education of Engineering, 2017(03): 1-6.
[5] Ma Tingqi. Paradigm shift and implementation pathways for Emerging Engineering Education construction. China Higher Education, 2021(2): 16-18.
[6] Civil Aviation Administration of China, National Development and Reform Commission, & Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. The 14th Five-Year Plan for Civil Aviation Development. 2021.
[7] Civil Aviation Administration of China. Guiding opinions on implementing the overall strategy for Digital China and accelerating the development of smart civil aviation (CAAC Document No. 17). 2023. https://www.caac.gov.cn/XXGK/XXGK/ZCFB/ 202306/t20230630_220501.html.
[8] Shao Bo, Shi Jinfei, Zheng Feng, et al. The application-oriented undergraduate talent cultivation mode of “Full Elements of Large Courses and Small Projects” under the background of Emerging Engineering Education—Exploration and practice of Nanjing Institute of Technology. Research in Higher Education of Engineering, 2023(2): 25-31.
[9] Ma Hongwei. The “DGUT practice” of iterative innovation in modern industry college: Logic and approach. Research in Higher Education of Engineering, 2024(3): 98-102, 193.
[10] Tang Ruili, Liang Bingzhuo, Zhou Limin. Redesign of higher engineering education for complex systems – “deep integration” engineering education practice in Southern University of Science and Technology of SDIM. Research in Higher Education of Engineering, 2023(5): 41-47.
[11] Li Zhiyi, Zhu Hong. Promoting comprehensive reform of undergraduate education and teaching with advanced quality assurance concepts − A connotative analysis on the index systems of new round of audit evaluation. Research in Higher Education of Engineering, 2021(6): 75-80.
[12] Sun Yanyan, Peng Di. Cognitive modeling of complex engineering problem solving and classroom teaching strategies. China University Teaching, 2024(10): 68-76.