HIGH-PRECISION SEISMIC SOURCE LOCALIZATION ALGORITHMS BASED ON NONLINEAR OPTIMIZATION AND 3D DEPTH LAYOUT
Keywords:
Earthquake source location, Nonlinear optimization, Three-dimensional station network layoutAbstract
Addressing the core challenge in seismic monitoring—where the accuracy of seismic source localization is affected by geological medium heterogeneity and geometric constraints of the monitoring network—this study constructs a progressive modeling framework that integrates geometric analysis, nonlinear optimization, and statistical sampling. The study first establishes an algebraic analytical model based on the principle of spherical intersection and, through iterative least-squares methods, reduces the sum of squared positioning residuals in an ideal scenario to 0.02 units. To address the ±0.2% ranging errors encountered in practical engineering applications, the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm and Monte Carlo sampling are introduced to quantify the anisotropy of the error distribution and reveal the sensitivity of vertical positioning accuracy to station geometric constraints. To further enhance system robustness, the study utilized the Shapiro-Wilk test to remove outliers and employed multi-source data fusion via high-density station network redundancy constraints, significantly reducing vertical positioning errors. Finally, numerical simulations validated the scientific validity of the three-dimensional depth layout of monitoring stations, demonstrating that multi-depth configurations can reduce the average positioning error by 42.84%. The “theoretical modeling—error analysis—engineering optimization” technical chain established in this study provides critical technical support for the development of earthquake early warning systems and three-dimensional monitoring networks.References
[1] Wang C, Cao A, Jia B, et al. New Approaches to Assess Seismic Monitoring Quality in Underground Mines: Data Completeness and Source Location Accuracy. Applied Sciences, 2025, 15(21): 11559-11559.
[2] Liu S, Zhao J R, Lu H J, et al. High-precision identification and localization of noise sources based on acoustic metamaterials. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control, 2025, 44(1): 274-289.
[3] He J, Li H, Li B, et al. Enhancing convergence speed and accuracy of virtual field optimization method for microseismic source location in tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology incorporating Trenchless Technology Research, 2025: 158106366-106366.
[4] Feng Q, Han L, Ma L, et al. High-Precision Microseismic Source Localization Using a Fusion Network Combining Convolutional Neural Network and Transformer. Surveys in Geophysics, 2024, 45(5): 1527-1560.
[5] Zhang Q, Cheng Z, Liang H, et al. High-Precision Localization of Passive Intermodulation Source in Radio Frequency Transmission Lines Based on Dual-Frequency Signals. Electronics, 2024, 13(5).
[6] Chen X, Meng X, Gong Q, et al. High precision localisation of the sources of noise of a bent-axis motor. Vibration Worldwide, 2023, 54(7-8): 350-359.
[7] R D S, J R S, L. J H. Fracture‐Mesh Faulting in the Swarm‐Like 2020 Maacama Sequence Revealed by High‐Precision Earthquake Detection, Location, and Focal Mechanisms. Geophysical Research Letters, 2023, 50(1).
[8] Lomax A, Savvaidis A. High-Precision Earthquake Location Using Source-Specific Station Terms and Inter-Event Waveform Similarity. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2022, 127(1): e2021JB023190-e2021JB023190.
[9] Jian L, Feifei Z, Xiaoliang W, et al. The Underground Explosion Point Measurement Method Based on High-Precision Location of Energy Focus.IEEE ACCESS, 2020: 8165989-166002.
[10] Physics - Geophysics. New Findings from China Coal Research Institute Update Understanding of Geophysics (The Effect of P- and S-phase Arrivals On the Accuracy of Microseismic Source Location). News of Science, 2019.