PROBING THE COGNITIVE APPRAISAL STRUCTURE OF EMOTION REPRESENTATIONS IN LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS (LLMS): A FULLY AUTOMATED GEOMETRIC ANALYSIS BASED ON CHINESE–ENGLISH BILINGUAL CORPORA

Authors

  • HuaYing Liu Independent Researcher, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, China.
  • LiJie Luo (Corresponding Author) Guangxi Liyang Artificial Intelligence Application Software Co., Ltd., Nanning 530000, Guangxi, China.

Keywords:

Large language models, Emotion representations, Cognitive appraisal theory, Representational similarity analysis, AI cognition

Abstract

The emotional capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have been extensively validated, yet the organizational principles and cognitive regularities underlying their internal emotion representations remain poorly understood. This study introduces Smith and Ellsworth’s (1985) cognitive appraisal theory and designs an automated experimental pipeline in which five mainstream LLMs rate Chinese and English emotional texts along six appraisal dimensions. Combining representational similarity analysis, principal component analysis, and unsupervised clustering, we systematically probed the geometric structure of the LLMs’ emotion space. The results show that the appraisal structures of all LLMs are significantly aligned with human templates; however, under the English condition, the alignment did not surpass a purely semantic baseline, whereas under the Chinese condition the LLMs’ appraisals significantly outperform the semantic baseline. The LLMs’ appraisal space exhibits a systematic “responsibility shift,” in which the responsibility dimension is disproportionately amplified on higher-order principal axes. Chinese alignment is significantly higher than English alignment for all models, and clustering structures were driven more by linguistic properties than by model architecture differences. These findings reveal that LLMs form emotion-cognitive structures that exhibit both commonalities and language-specific particularities, providing a psychology-theory-driven quantitative framework for explainable artificial intelligence (AI).

References

[1] Zhang Y Z, Wang M Y, Wu Y X, et al. DialogueLLM: Context and emotion knowledge-tuned large language models for emotion recognition in conversations. Neural Networks, 2025, 192: 107901. DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2025.107901.

[2] Loh S B, Raamkumar A S. Harnessing large language models‘ empathetic response generation capabilities for online mental health counselling support. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2310.08017, 2023.

[3] Pereira P, Moniz H, Carvalho J P. Deep emotion recognition in textual conversations: a survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2025, 58: 10. DOI: 10.1007/s10462-024-11010-y.

[4] Russell J A. A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 39(6): 1161-1178. DOI: 10.1037/h0077714.

[5] Smith C A, Ellsworth P C. Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985, 48(4): 813-838. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.813.

[6] Scherer K R. The role of culture in emotion-antecedent appraisal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997, 73(5): 902-922. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.73.5.902.

[7] Kriegeskorte N, Kievit R A. Representational geometry: integrating cognition, computation, and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2013, 17(8): 401-412. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.007.

[8] Demszky D, Movshovitz-Attias D, Ko J, et al. GoEmotions: A dataset of fine-grained emotions. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2020: 4040-4054. DOI: 10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.372.

[9] Ekman P. An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 1992, 6(3-4): 169-200. DOI: 10.1080/02699939208411068.

[10] Chinese Information Processing Society of China. Weibo Emotion Classification Dataset (V1). 2023. https://cstr.cn/16666.11.nbsdc.s4zxUgiP.

[11] Yeo G C, Ong D C. Associations between cognitive appraisals and emotions: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 2024, 150(12): 1440-1471. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000452.

[12] Steiger J H. Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 87(2): 245-251. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245.

[13] Robert P, Escoufier Y. A unifying tool for linear multivariate statistical methods: The RV-coefficient. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 1976, 25(3): 257-265. DOI: 10.2307/2347233.

[14] Ruder D, Uusberg A, Sirts K. Assessing the reliability and validity of GPT-4 in annotating emotion appraisal ratings. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology (CLPsych), 2025: 1-10. DOI: 10.18653/v1/2025.clpsych-1.1.

[15] Raj C, Banerjee M, Pan J H, et al. Talent or luck? Evaluating attribution bias in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2505.22910v2, 2025.

[16] Zhang J J. Attach importance to the impact of ethnic language on personality. China National Education, 2018(1): 11. DOI: 10.16855/j.cnki.zgmzjy.2018.01.006.

[17] Hong Y Y, Morris M W, Chiu C Y, et al. Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 2000, 55(7): 709-720. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.7.709.

[18] Lu J G, Song L L, Zhang L D. Cultural tendencies in generative AI. Nature Human Behaviour, 2025, 9(11): 2360–2369. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-025-02242-1.

[19] Han J W, Song W J, Lee J G, et al. Quantifying data contamination in psychometric evaluations of LLMs. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL 2026, 2026: 6070-6088. DOI: 10.18653/v1/2026.findings-eacl.319.

[20] Paulo G, Mallen A, Juang C, et al. Automatically interpreting millions of features in large language models. In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), PMLR, 2025, 267: 48393-48421.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-09

Issue

Section

Research Article

DOI:

How to Cite

HuaYing Liu, LiJie Luo. Probing The Cognitive Appraisal Structure Of Emotion Representations In Large Language Models (Llms): A Fully Automated Geometric Analysis Based On Chinese–English Bilingual Corpora. World Journal of Information Technology. 2026, 4(3): 64-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wjit3102.