SELF-PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT OF DIGITAL PLATFORMS AND ITS ANTI-MONOPOLY REGULATION
Keywords:
Digital platforms, Self-preferential treatment, Anti-monopolyAbstract
The rapid development of the digital economy has given rise to the issue of self-preferential treatment by digital platforms. This paper argues that self-preferential treatment stems from the dual role of platform operators and the "anchoring effect" in the operation of digital platforms. Self-preferential treatment conducted by digital platforms is a manifestation of the leverage effect in the digital economy, thus requiring corresponding anti-monopoly regulation. However, platform self-preferential treatment is significantly different from the restricted transactions, tying, and differential treatment stipulated in the current Anti-Monopoly Law. It should be regarded as an independent abuse of dominant market position and the concept of digital essential facilities should be introduced to regulate such behavior.References
[1] Chen Yongwei. Competition and Governance of Platform economy: Challenges and Reflections. Industrial Organization Review, 2017, 11(03): 137-154.
[2] Sun Jin, Ma Shanshan. The Dilemmas of Antitrust Regulation and Optimization Paths to Self-Preferential Treatment for Digital Platforms. Research on Rule of Law, 2024(01): 139-149. DOI: 10.16224/j.cnki.cn33-1343/d.20240005.005.
[3] Chen Yongwei. Rethinking Platform Antitrust: A Firm-Market Duality Perspective. Competition Policy Research, 2018(05): 25-34.
[4] Zhou Mengyi. Self-preferencing of Digital Platforms: Behavior Types and Legal Regulations. Journal of Huaqiao University(Philosophy & Social Sciences), 2024(02): 79-89+119. DOI: 10.16067/j.cnki.35-1049/c.2024.02.007.
[5] Lan Jianghua. Big Digital Platforms' Self-preferential Treatment: Behavioral Mechanism. Economic Effect and Regulation Path, South China Finance, 2023(07): 69-82.
[6] Bougette P, Budzinski O, Marty F. Self-Preferencing and Competitive Damages:A Focus on Exploitative Abuses. The Antitrust Bulletin, 2022, 67(2): 190-207.
[7] Lan Lei. A Critical Analysis of the Criticism against Self-Preferential Treatment by Digital Platforms. Oriental Law, 2024(02): 122-135. DOI: 10.19404/j.cnki.dffx.2024.02.014.
[8] Motta M. Self-preferencing and foreclosure in digital markets: Theories of harm for abuse cases. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2023, 90: 102974.
[9] Li Xin. Analysis of Platform Data-based Self-reference by Antitrust Law. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2023, 38(01): 101-111.
[10] Graef I. Differentiated treatment in platform-to-business relations: EU competition law and economic dependence. Yearbook of European Law, 2019, 38: 448-499.
[11] Deng Feng. Conduction, Leverage and the Positioning of China's Anti-Monopoly Law: A Case Study of the Anti-Monopoly Review of Coca-Cola's Acquisition of Huiyuan. China Legal Science, 2011(01): 179-190. DOI: 10.14111/j.cnki.zgfx.2011.01.008.
[12] Li Yongjian, Xia Jiechang. Potential Risks and Its Preventive Strategies of Double Round Monopoly of Super Platform under the Background of Digital Economy. Law Science, 2020(02): 103-128.
[13] Wei Xin, Dai Jianhua. The Illegality Determination of Exclusive Dealing from the Perspective of Anti-monopoly. On Economic Problems, 2021(03): 9-15. DOI: 10.16011/j.cnki.jjwt.2021.03.002.
[14] Deng Hui. Self-preferential Treatment of Digital Advertising Platforms: Contextual Integrity, Behaviors and Binding Conditions of Anti-monopoly Enforcement. Tribune of Political Science and Law, 2022, 40(03): 103-116.
[15] Sun Xiulei. On the “Self-preferential Treatment” Behavior and Regulation of Digital Economy Platform: From the Perspective of Amazon Development Model. South China Finance, 2021(06): 81-89.
[16] Wang Jun, Yang Penglin. Research on the Regulation of Super Platform Using Data to Implement Self-preferential Behavior. Xiamen University Law Review, 2023(01): 117-141.
[17] He Simai. On the Qualitative Behavior and Governance Path of Self Preferential Treatment. Public Administration and Policy Review, 2024, 13(01): 154-168.
[18] Stucke M E, Ezrachi A. When competition fails to optimize quality: A look at search engines. Yale JL & Tech., 2016, 18: 70.