FROM PASSIVE LISTENING TO ACTIVE LEARNING: REFORMING MANAGEMENT INNOVATION EDUCATION TO BOOST STUDENT ENGAGEMENT
Keywords:
Active learning, Student engagement, Management Innovation, Pedagogical reform, Higher education, ChinaAbstract
Low student engagement has long been a key issue in management education, especially in courses requiring creativity and critical thinking, such as the course of Management Innovation. This study investigated how effectively active learning strategies improved student engagement under these circumstances. The research took place at Guilin University of Aerospace Technology in China from March to June 2025. It used a quasi-experimental design which involved undergraduate students from three business-related majors: Marketing, Human Resource Management, and Logistics Management. One class from each major received teaching reforms focused on student-centered and participatory methods. The remaining classes used the traditional lecture format. Data came from classroom observations, teacher reflections, student assignments, and informal feedback. The findings showed that students in the classes with immediate teaching reforms demonstrated higher levels of behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement. They participated more actively, collaborated more effectively, and displayed deeper critical thinking in their coursework. The discussion explained these results through constructivist learning theory and emphasized the alignment between course objectives, assessments, and learning strategies. This study concluded that active learning provides a sustainable and practical solution for improving engagement in management courses focused on innovation. It contributed to the literature on teaching reform in higher education, offering actionable insights for educators and institutions aiming to create student-centered learning environments.References
[1] S B Umar, J Ahmad, M A B Mohd Bukhori, et al. Transforming Higher-Education-Intitutes: Impact of Change Management on Sustainable Performance Through Transformational Leadership and Knowledge Management. Sustainability, 2025, 17(6): 2445. DOI: 10.3390/su17062445.
[2] M A Marlia, R Fahmy, H Lukito, et al. An Exploratory Study on Effective Leadership and Change Management in the Transformation of Indonesian Public Universities Towards World-Class University Status. Sustainability, 2025, 17(3): 1300. DOI: 10.3390/su17031300.
[3] S Moyo. Learning and Organizational Change: A Case Study of Using Learning Intervention in a Strategic Management Course. Open Journal of Business and Management, 2023, 11(5): 2175–2197. DOI: 10.4236/ojbm.2023.115120.
[4] K L Boehme, T Goetz M Feuchter, F Preckel. Is Boredom the Opposite of Interest? A Longitudinal Reciprocal Effect Study. Educational Psychology Review, 2025, 37(1): 15. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-025-09991-5.
[5] L Deslauriers, L S McCarty, K Miller, et al. Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2019, 116(39): 19251–19257. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1821936116.
[6] S Freeman. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014, 111(23): 8410–8415. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
[7] H Dietrich, T Evans. Traditional lectures versus active learning – A false dichotomy? STEM Education, 2022, 2(4): 275–292. DOI: 10.3934/steme.2022017.
[8] R M Carini, G D Kuh, S P Klein. Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages. Research in Higher Education, 2006, 47(1): 1–32. DOI: 10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9.
[9] V Korhonen, M Mattsson, M Inkinen, et al. Understanding the Multidimensional Nature of Student Engagement During the First Year of Higher Education. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019, 10: 1056. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01056.
[10] A Kozanitis, L Nenciovici. Effect of active learning versus traditional lecturing on the learning achievement of college students in humanities and social sciences: a meta-analysis. Higher Education, 2023, 86(6): 1377–1394. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-022-00977-8.
[11] V Gkogkidis, N Dacre. Co-Creating Educational Project Management Board Games to Enhance Student Engagement. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2020. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3812772.
[12] T Kopeczi-Bócz. The Impact of a Combination of Flipped Classroom and Project-Based Learning on the Learning Motivation of University Students. Education Sciences, 2024, 14(3): 240. DOI: 10.3390/educsci14030240.
[13] H L Tay. Using Integrated Course Design for Flipped Classroom to Promote Active Learning of Lean Six Sigma for Supply Chains. International Journal of Management and Applied Research, 2021, 8(1): 36–50. DOI: 10.18646/2056.81.21-003.
[14] P Hallinger, J Lu. Learner centered higher education in East Asia: assessing the effects on student engagement. International Journal of Management and Applied Research, 2013, 27(6): 594–612. DOI: 10.1108/IJEM-06-2012-0072.
[15] G W Scott. Active engagement with assessment and feedback can improve group-work outcomes and boost student confidence. Higher Education Pedagogies, 2017, 2(1): 1–13. DOI: 10.1080/23752696.2017.1307692.
[16] J B Stang, I Roll. Interactions between teaching assistants and students boost engagement in physics labs. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 2014, 10(2): 020117. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020117.
[17] H T Hung. Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2015, 28(1): 81–96. DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2014.967701.
[18] M Prince. Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 2004, 93(3): 223–231. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x.
[19] G Anthony. Active Learning in a Constructivist Framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1996, 31(4): 349–369.
[20] I V Rossi, J D De Lima, B Sabatke, et al. Active learning tools improve the learning outcomes, scientific attitude, and critical thinking in higher education: Experiences in an online course during the COVID ‐19 pandemic. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 2021, 49(6): 888–903. DOI: 10.1002/bmb.21574.
[21] A H Sulaiman. The Use of Active Learning Strategies to Foster Effective Teaching in Higher Education Institutions. Zanco Journal of Humanity Sciences, 2024, 28(4). DOI: 10.21271/zjhs.28.4.18.
[22] I El-Thalji. Boosting Active Learning Through a Gamified Flipped Classroom: A Retrospective Case Study in Higher Engineering Education. Education Sciences, 2025, 15(4): 430. DOI: 10.3390/educsci15040430.
[23] R Khanal. An Investigation of The Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom Teaching in Project Management Course: a Case Study of Australian Higher Education. PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 2020, 4(2): 348–368. DOI: 10.20319/pijtel.2020.42.348368.
[24] P Moll-Khosrawi, C Zollner, N Cencin, et al. Flipped learning enhances non-technical skill performance in simulation-based education: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Medical Education, 2021, 21(1): 353. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02766-w.
[25] L Neriz, A Núnez, V Fuentes-Caceres, et al. Simulation-based training as a teaching and learning tool for management education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2020, 57(6): 701–713. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2019.1631874.
[26] E Acevedo, A J Lazar. Active Learning and Interpersonal Skills Development among First-Generation College Students.International Studies Perspectives, 2022, 23(3): 249–270. DOI: 10.1093/isp/ekab010.