Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.
Open Access

COMPARISON OF THEORETICAL MODELS OF ACCULTURATION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY

Download as PDF

Volume 3, Issue 1, Pp 22-26, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wjes3030

Author(s)

XiLong Zhao

Affiliation(s)

College of Vocational and Further Education, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, China.

Corresponding Author

XiLong Zhao

ABSTRACT

This study investigates the phenomenon of acculturation, especially cultural shock among international students, focusing on its underlying mechanisms and potential mitigation strategies. Despite the increasing number of students studying overseas, many encounter significant psychological and socio-cultural challenges due to cultural differences, leading to issues such as depression and anxiety. This paper reviews the existing literature on acculturation, tracing its crucial definition and stages. The U-curve and W-curve models are examined to understand the temporal dynamics of cultural adaptation, with particular attention to the four-stage model. Additionally, by comparing Self-Determination Theory and its sub-theories, including Cognitive Evaluation Theory, Organismic Integration Theory, Basic Psychological Needs Theory, Causality Orientation Theory, and Goal Content Theory, it highlights that fulfilling basic psychological needs and fostering intrinsic motivation can enhance international students' resilience against cultural shock. This research sheds light on understanding and addressing the challenges faced by international students in cross-cultural environments, ultimately contributing to their improved mental health and academic success.

KEYWORDS

Models of acculturation; Educational psychology; International students; Theoretical comparison

CITE THIS PAPER

XiLong Zhao. Comparison of theoretical models of acculturation from the perspective of educational psychology. World Journal of Educational Studies. 2025, 3(1): 22-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wjes3030.

REFERENCES

[1] Wang Y, Li T, Noltemeyer A, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of international college students in the United States. Journal of international students, 2018, 8(2): 821-842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1250383.

[2] Ammigan R, Veerasamy Y S, Cruz N I. ‘Growing from an acorn to an oak tree’: a thematic analysis of international students’ cross-cultural adjustment in the United States. Studies in Higher Education, 2023, 48(4): 567-581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2022.2150757.

[3] Jiang Wangmeng, Ma Qiang. English teaching system design based on ID3 algorithm and node optimization. PeerJ Computer Science. 2023, 9: e1486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1486.

[4] Zimmerman S L, Policy L E. Theoretical Approaches. Sage Publications. Newbury Park, CA, 1988.

[5] Jasso G. Principles of theoretical analysis. Sociological Theory, 1988, 6(1): 1-20.

[6] Oberg K. Cultural shock: Adjustment to new cultural environments. Practical anthropology, 1960 (4): 177-182.

[7] Lysgaard S. Adjustment in a Foreign Society: Norwegian Fulbright Grantees Visiting the United States. International Social Sciences Bulletin, 1955, 7: 45-51.

[8] Adler P S. The transitional experience: An alternative view of culture shock. Journal of humanistic psychology, 1975, 15(4): 13-23.

[9] Gullahorn J T, Gullahorn J E. An extension of the U-Curve Hypothesis 1. Journal of social issues, 1963, 19(3): 33-47.

[10] Ward, C, Okura, Y, Kennedy, A, et al. The U-curve on trial: A longitudinal study of psychological and sociocultural adjustment during cross-cultural transition. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1998, 22(3): 277-291.

[11] Deci E L, Ryan R M. Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. The Oxford handbook of human motivation, 2012, 18(6): 85-107.

[12] Kasser T, Ryan R M. A dark side of the American dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1993, 65: 410-422.

[13] Rummel A, Feinberg R. Cognitive evaluation theory: A meta-analytic review of the literature. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 1988, 16(2): 147-164.

[14] Ryan R M. Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1982, 43(3): 450-461.

[15] Pelletier L G, Rocchi M. Organismic integration theory: a theory of regulatory styles, internalization, integration, and human functioning in society. The Oxford handbook of self-determination theory, 2023: 53-83.

[16] Gilal F G, Zhang J, Paul, J, et al. The role of self-determination theory in marketing science: An integrative review and agenda for research. European Management Journal, 2019, 37(1): 29-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2018.10.004.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. sitemap
Copyright © 2017 - 2025 Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.   All Rights Reserved.