Author(s)

Yue Kong^*, Jing Wang, Xiao Li

Affiliation(s)

Department of Administrative Management, School of Economics and Management, Dalian Minzu University, Dalian, 116000, China.

Corresponding Author

Yue Kong

ABSTRACT

Currently, the reform of the digital administration is imminent. Although traditional decision-making regulation policies can solve most social public problems, it is difficult to achieve the unity of timeliness and accuracy. Algorithmic decision-making is a process of analyzing, processing, and predicting data through computer algorithms to assist humans in making decisions. The rational use of algorithms can improve decision-making efficiency, reduce labor costs, and lower the risk of misjudgment. This paper conducts a multi-dimensional analysis of the internal logical relationship between public service equalization and algorithmic decision-making, continuously adjusts and optimizes the algorithm model, and explores algorithm applications and solutions that are beneficial to the development of public undertakings, thereby optimizing resource allocation. By applying algorithmic decision-making to public service fields such as intelligent transportation systems, medical resource allocation, educational resource optimization, public safety monitoring, social welfare policy formulation, and disaster emergency response, the quality of public services can be improved, the sustainable development of various social fields can be promoted, and the continuous improvement of the lives of the broad masses of the people can be achieved.

KEYWORDS

Public service; Algorithmic decision-making; Optimization path; Resource allocation

CITE THIS PAPER

Yue Kong, Jing Wang, Xiao Li. Exploration of the optimization path of algorithmic decision-making from the perspective of public service equalization: based on the survey experience of the tourism boom in northeast China during the Spring Festival. Trends in Social Sciences and Humanities Research. 2025, 3(2): 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/tsshr3136.

REFERENCES

[1] Chen Zihan. Exploring several issues of algorithmic decision making in the public domain. Theory Exploration, 2020, (03): 113-120.

[2] Yan Jiahua. Mechanisms and paths to enhance the fairness of decision-making in administration governance algorithms. Administrative Forum, 2022, 29(03): 34-40.

[3] Wang Taixian, Tang Yi. Artificial Intelligence Embedded in administration Governance: Algorithmic Picture, Value Problem and Return Path. China Science and Technology Forum, 2023, (02): 104-113.

[4] Deng Mingfeng. Research on the Challenge and Legal Regulation of Algorithmic Administration on the Principle of Due Process. Hebei Law, 2024, 42(06): 112-126.

[5] Chen Menggen, Liu Yushan, Zhang Qiao. Research on the impact of digital economy on basic public services. Research on Financial Issues, 2024, (04): 81-93

[6] Bansak K, Paulson E. Public attitudes on performance for algorithmic and human decision-makers.PNAS nexus, 2024, 3(12): 520.

[7] Decker C M, Wegner L, Scholten L C. Procedural fairness in algorithmic decision-making: the role of public engagement. Choung H, Seberger S J, David P. When AI is Perceived to Be Fairer than a Human: Understanding Perceptions of Algorithmic Decisions in a Job Application Context.

[8] Toorn V G, Scully L J. Unveiling algorithmic power: exploring the impact of automated systems on disabled people’s engagement with social services. Disability & Society 2024, 39(11): 3004-3029.