Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.
Open Access

IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF UNDERGRADUATE CADETS IN MILITARY ACADEMIES

Download as PDF

Volume 3, Issue 1, Pp 50-55, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wjes3036

Author(s)

JinQi Wang

Affiliation(s)

Graduate School of National University of Defense Technology, Hunan 410073, Changsha, China.

Corresponding Author

JinQi Wang

ABSTRACT

The comprehensive evaluation of undergraduate cadets in military academies serves as the primary basis for their graduation assignments and is a crucial indicator for assessing the quality of education and talent cultivation in military institutions. Since its implementation, the comprehensive evaluation system has yielded notable results. This paper affirms the practical significance of the evaluation while analyzing its main practices and existing shortcomings. Furthermore, it proposes targeted improvement suggestions, offering valuable insights for the refinement and development of the comprehensive evaluation system.

KEYWORDS

Undergraduate cadets in military academies; The comprehensive evaluation; Improvement suggestions

CITE THIS PAPER

JinQi Wang. Improvement strategies for the comprehensive evaluation of undergraduate cadets in military academies. World Journal of Educational Studies. 2025, 3(1): 50-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wjes3036.

REFERENCES

[1] Wang Chengao, Sun Biao, Wang Minghua. Understanding and thinking on the three-in-one military talent training system. China Science and Technology Journal Database: Scientific Research, 2023(3): 111-114.

[2] Eugenijus Kurilovas. On data-driven decision-making for quality education. Elsevier Ltd, 2020, 107.

[3] Andrekos Varnava. Antigone Heraclidou, Imperial Control in Cyprus: Education and Political Manipulation in the British Empire. SAGE Publications, 2020, 55(2).

[4] Hui Yu, Zhongqiu Zhang. The Enlightenment of Student Affairs Management in British Universities on Student Work of Chinese University. Management Science and Engineering, 2019, 13(1).

[5] Yang Luowa, Yu Wei. An Analysis of the Characteristics of the New Curriculum Reform in the UK. Social Science Front, 2019(12): 250-254.

[6] George, Maier, Robson. Ignoring race: a comparative analysis of education policy in British Columbia and Ontario. Routledge, 2020, 23(2).

[7] John M. LaVelle, Nina Sabarre, Haley Umans. An Empirical Examination of Evaluation’s Presence in the Undergraduate Curriculum in the United States. American Journal of Evaluation, 2020, 41(2).

[8] Peterson W M, Augustine H C. Organizational Practices Enhancing the Influence of Student Assessment Information in Academic Decisions. Research in Higher Education, 2000, 41(1): 21-52.

[9] Zhou Wenwen, Tang Liwen, Geng Yandong, et al. Design of talent training standards for undergraduate education in military academies. Journal of Higher Education, 2023, 9(1): 163-167.

[10] Wu Weishan. Improving humanistic literacy and strengthening cultural confidence through aesthetic education. Guangming Daily, 2019.

[11] Han Limin, Jin Zixi, Lu Jianhui. Research on the cultivation of military blood: a positive psychology perspective. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology Press, 2020: 1.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. sitemap
Copyright © 2017 - 2025 Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.   All Rights Reserved.