Author(s)

Nofal Abdulhadi

Affiliation(s)

Graduate School of Management, Post Graduate Centre, Management and Science University (MSU), University Drive, Off Persiaran Olahraga, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 

Corresponding Author

Nofal Abdulhadi

ABSTRACT

This study investigates the moderating effect of team size on remote project management outcomes in Saudi Arabian organizations, addressing a critical gap in understanding optimal virtual team configurations in emerging markets. Through quantitative analysis of data collected from 289 project professionals across multiple sectors in Saudi Arabia, the research examines how varying team sizes influence project completion rates, resource utilization, and coordination efficiency in remote work environments. Using structural equation modeling and hierarchical regression analysis, the findings reveal that medium-sized teams (8-12 members) demonstrate optimal performance metrics in remote settings. In comparison, larger teams (>15 members) show diminishing returns in coordination efficiency and project completion rates. The study also identifies critical thresholds where increasing team size begins to negatively impact virtual collaboration effectiveness. Results indicate that team size explains 34% of the variance in project completion rates when controlling for project complexity and industry type. These findings contribute to project management theory by establishing team size as a significant moderating variable in remote project success, particularly within the Saudi Arabian context. The research provides practical implications for project managers in optimizing team configurations for remote work, offering evidence-based recommendations for team sizing based on project scope and complexity. This study advances our understanding of virtual team dynamics in emerging markets and provides a foundation for future research on team size optimization in remote project management.

KEYWORDS

Team size; Remote project management; Virtual teams; Saudi Arabia; Project performance; Coordination efficiency; Team configuration; Project success factors

CITE THIS PAPER

Nofal Abdulhadi. Team size as a moderating factor in remote project management: evidence from Saudi Arabia. Social Science and Management. 2025, 2(2): 75-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/ssm3038.

REFERENCES

[1] Bell BS, Kozlowski SW. Virtual team dynamics and effectiveness: Current research and future directions. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2019, 6: 363-388.

[2] Alshamrani K, Ghulam E, Alattas M. Digital transformation and remote work adoption in Saudi Arabia: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Management Studies, 2023, 15(2): 156-170.

[3] AlHudaithi B, Al-Shehri M, Alhussan A. Remote teams in project management practices: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Project Management, 2019, 37(2): 78-92.

[4] Johnson A, Brown L. The impact of remote teams on project management in Saudi Arabian organizations. Journal of Project Management, 2022, 15(3): 45-58.

[5] Williams PJ, Robinson CD. Theoretical perspectives on remote teams in project management: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Project Management, 2018, 40(4): 112-126.

[6] Kumar N. Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030: Structural reforms and organizational transformation. Journal of Sustainable Development, 2023, 16(4): 92-105.

[7] Hackman JR. The design of work teams. In: Lorsch JW, editor. Handbook of organizational behavior. Prentice-Hall, 2018: 315-342.

[8] Henderson LS, Stackman RW, Lindekilde R. Team size dynamics in project management: A global study. Project Management Journal, 2019, 50(2): 201-219.

[9] Latané B, Williams K, Harkins S. Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2019, 37(6): 822-832.

[10] Bell BS, Kozlowski SW. Virtual team dynamics: A comprehensive review and future research directions. Journal of Management, 2020, 46(1): 89-122.

[11] Martinez P, Chen X. Virtual team size and performance: An empirical investigation. Organization Science, 2021, 32(2): 233-255.

[12] AlQahtani S, Smith J. Cultural dimensions of project management in Saudi Arabia: Implications for team configuration. Middle Eastern Management Studies, 2022, 14(2): 89-104.

[13] Al-Rashidi H, Johnson K, Smith M. Remote team effectiveness in Saudi Arabian technology sector: A size-based analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 2023, 41(3): 167-182.

[14] Wong S, Peterson M. Optimal team configurations in virtual environments: A meta-analysis. Management Science Quarterly, 2021, 66(4): 578-599.

[15] Thompson R, Ahmed K, Wilson M. Technology mediation in remote team performance: The role of team size. Journal of Information Technology, 2022, 37(1): 45-67.

[16] Mohajan HK. Quantitative research: A successful investigation in natural and social sciences. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 2020, 9(4): 50-79.

[17] Watson R. Quantitative research. Nursing Standard, 2015, 29(31): 44-48.

[18] Kouatli I. The use of fuzzy logic as augmentation to quantitative analysis to unleash knowledge of participants' uncertainty when filling a survey. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2022, 34(3): 1489-1500.