COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF COST STRUCTURES BETWEEN PREFABRICATED CONCRETE BUILDINGS AND TRADITIONAL CAST-IN-SITU CONSTRUCTION: A CASE STUDY OF BUILDING #3, HUILONGGUAN PLOT 1818-028, BEIJING
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pp 50-55, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/ejst3090
Author(s)
ZhiWei Wang, YiHang Tao*
Affiliation(s)
Hebei Donghan Construction Engineering Co., Ltd, Shijiazhuang 050000, Hebei, China.
Corresponding Author
YiHang Tao
ABSTRACT
Prefabricated concrete construction incurs significant cost premiums over traditional cast-in-situ methods, with the Huilongguan project case (40% prefabrication rate) in Beijing demonstrating a unit cost increase of CNY 443/m2 (+43%). Granular cost breakdown reveals the core contradiction: prefabricated component costs (including production and transportation) account for 85% of the increment at CNY 680/m2. Although temporary formwork costs decrease by CNY 130/m2 and scaffolding expenses reduce by 60%, vertical transportation costs rise by 22%. Key challenges stem from three systemic constraints: 1) Component production hindered by insufficient scale (<50,000 m2 projects increase mold amortization costs by 30-50%); 2) Structural labor shifts (certified lifters replace steel fixers but with reduced efficiency); and 3) Low transport efficiency (bulky components limit truckload capacity). Improvement pathways include economies of scale (>100,000 m2 projects reduce mold amortization by 8%), standardized design (fewer component types enhance efficiency), and policy compensation (Floor Area Ratio bonuses/VAT rebates). Empirical evidence shows prefabricated masonry can reduce costs by 80%, while schedule compression offsets up to 30% of financing costs. Supply chain integration requires design-production-installation coordination to optimize transport (5-10% of total costs). With scaling and policy incentives, incremental costs are projected to narrow to CNY 200-500/m2.
KEYWORDS
Prefabrication cost premium; Economies of scale; Prefabrication rate; GB/T51231-2016; Temporary works optimization; Policy compensation
CITE THIS PAPER
ZhiWei Wang, YiHang Tao. Comparative analysis of cost structures between prefabricated concrete buildings and traditional cast-in-situ construction: a case study of building #3, Huilongguan plot 1818-028, Beijing. Eurasia Journal of Science and Technology. 2019, 1(1): 50-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/ejst3090.
REFERENCES
[1] Yan H. Comparative Analysis of Construction Costs for Prefabricated Building Systems. Housing Industry, 2012(07): 36-38.
[2] Gou H, Mao C, Dong X. Comparative Study on Construction Costs of Prefabricated and Cast-in-Place Buildings. Construction Economy, 2018, 39(03): 71-74. DOI: 10.14181/j.cnki.1002-851x.201803071.
[3] Jiang Q. Development Overview of Prefabricated Concrete Buildings Worldwide. Building Technology, 2010, 41(12): 1074-1077. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4726.2010.12.001.
[4] Zhang J, Jia X, Xiang C, et al. Cost Comparison Between Prefabricated Concrete and Traditional Cast-in-Place Construction. Concrete World, 2017(09): 76-79.
[5] Wang G, Wu Z. Incremental Cost Analysis and Countermeasure Research for Prefabricated Concrete Buildings. Construction Economy, 2017, 38(01): 15-21. DOI: 10.14181/j.cnki.1002-851x.201701015.
[6] Li J. Comparative Study on Costs Between Prefabricated and Cast-in-Place Construction Projects. Engineering Cost Management, 2018(03): 56-60.
[7] Pinor. Cost Increment of Prefabricated Buildings: Comprehensive Analysis Through Three Cases. 2019. https://ind-building.cscec.com/jsjl/201909/2967232.html.
[8] Qi Y, Chang S, Ji Y, et al. BIM-Based Incremental Cost Analysis Method of Prefabricated Buildings in China. Sustainability, 2018, 10(11): 4293. DOI: 10.3390/su10114293.
[9] Wang H, Zhu H, Yu C. Development of Hunan’s Provincial Key Lab for Prefabricated Buildings at University of South China. Indoor and Built Environment, 2018, 27(8): 1017-1021. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X18770392.
[10] Wang S, Yasir M, Liu G, et al. Supply Chain Cost Prediction for Prefabricated Building Construction Under Uncertainty. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, 2018: 1-5. DOI: 10.1155/2018/4180269.
[11] Ustinovicius T G. Development and Efficiency of Prefabricated Building Components. International Journal of Smart Home, 2016, 10(6): 85-94. DOI: 10.14257/ijsh.2016.10.6.08.
[12] Kim Y, Han S, Yi J, et al. Supply Chain Cost Model for Prefabricated Building Material Based on Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2016, 43(4): 287-293. DOI: 10.1139/cjce-2015-0223.
[13] Gan X, Chang R, Langston C, et al. Exploring Interactions Among Factors Impeding Prefabricated Building Technology Diffusion. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2019, 26(3): 535-553. DOI: 10.1108/ECAM-05-2018-0198.
[14] Lv Z, Zhang D. Analysis of Life Cycle Stages in Prefabricated Buildings. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, 330(2): 022075. DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/330/2/022075.