THE CONSTRUCTION OF SELF-REGULATION PROMOTION STRATEGY AND EFFECT EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL ENGLISH ONLINE TEACHING: BASED ON INTELLIGENT LANGUAGE MODELING
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pp 49-59, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wjes3046
Author(s)
Hong Xie
Affiliation(s)
Huafu Experimental School of Hongling Education Group, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China.
Corresponding Author
Hong Xie
ABSTRACT
This paper focuses on the application of intelligent language modeling in secondary school English online teaching, aiming to enhance students' learning autonomy, language proficiency and learning effect by constructing self-regulation facilitation strategies and effect evaluation system. Combining the technical advantages of intelligent language models, the study designs application scenarios such as personalized learning path generation, intelligent interaction and real-time feedback, automated assessment and diagnosis, and proposes self-regulation facilitation strategies such as meta-cognitive ability development, motivation maintenance mechanism, and behavior monitoring and intervention. Meanwhile, the study constructs an effect evaluation system containing process evaluation matrix, dynamic evaluation model and evaluation result application to comprehensively assess students' learning effectiveness. Through the empirical analysis of application cases, the effectiveness and feasibility of the intelligent language model in secondary school English online teaching are verified. This paper provides a new theoretical framework and practical path for secondary school English online teaching, which is of great significance for promoting the development of education information and intelligence.
KEYWORDS
Intelligent language modeling; Online teaching; Self-regulation; Quality evaluation
CITE THIS PAPER
Hong Xie. The construction of self-regulation promotion strategy and effect evaluation system for secondary school english online teaching: based on intelligent language modeling. World Journal of Educational Studies. 2025, 3(2): 49-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wjes3046.
REFERENCES
[1] Conter C, Ehrenworth M, Gould L. A High School English Teacher's Guide to Writing Memoir. Taylor & Francis, 2025.
[2] Hui D, Yajun C, Linling W. College English Online Teaching Model Based on Deep Learning. Security and Communication Networks, 2021.
[3] Weiyi Z, Mingming L. Investigating Translanguaging Practices in Senior High School English Classes: a Case Study.English Language Teaching, 2025, 18(6): 117-117.
[4] Ridley K, Bhowmik S. Translanguaging in Action: Authentic Teaching Practices in the High School English as an Additional Language Classroom. TESOL Journal, 2025, 16(2): e70045-e70045.
[5] Ruday S. Grammar Toolkit Lesson Plans for Middle School:Mentor Text-Based Grammar Lessons for the Middle School English Classroom. Taylor & Francis, 2024.
[6] Loretta H Silverman, Alan Seidman. Academic Progress in Developmental Math Courses: a Comparative Study of Student Retention. Journal of College Student Retention, 2011.
[7] Wang C, Wang B, Xu D. The role of ChatGPT and grammarly in promoting emotion regulation, psychological well-being, motivation, and academic writing in Chinese college students: a self-determination theory perspective. Learning and Motivation, 2025, 90: 102131-102131.
[8] Kim H, Kim B, Choi H M, et al. Conversion of Mixed-Language Free-Text CT Reports of Pancreatic Cancer to National Comprehensive Cancer Network Structured Reporting Templates by Using GPT-4. Korean journal of radiology, 2025.
[9] Guo A A, Canagasingham A, Rasiah K, et al. The Growing Role of Artificial Intelligence in Surgical Education: ChatGPT Undertakes the Australian Generic Surgical Sciences Examination. ANZ journal of surgery, 2025.
[10] Zoe B. Leaders of future-ready learners in the Singapore education system: perceptions, roles and implications. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 2023, 43(3): 759-774.
[11] Angela L. Exploring how response technologies shape instructor feedback: a comparison of Canvas Speedgrader, Google Docs, and Turnitin GradeMark. Computers and Composition, 2023, 68.
[12] Candido D H H, Seppanen P, Thrupp M. Business as the new doxa in education? An analysis of edu-business events in Finland. European Educational Research Journal, 2024, 23(1): 48-71.
[13] Wang J. A Review of the Development of the Integration Strategy of Information Technology and Education in the Four Countries of the United States, Britain, China, and Singapore. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 2021, 9(2).
[14] Jason E. Serious Questions from Serious People: the Past and Future of the History of Education in Canada. History of Education Quarterly, 2024, 64(3): 352-356.
[15] Eleanor N. Caste and UK education: a historical overview. British Journal of Religious Education, 2020, 42(2): 141-151.
[16] Birgit P, Anu K, Raija P, et al. Collaboration for Inclusive Practices: Teaching Staff Perspectives from Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 2022, 66(3): 427-440.
[17] Zhang Q. Efficiency of segmented ludicization in language learning regarding ZPD progress, technology-initiated interactivity, and learner-initiated interactivity. Education and Information Technologies, 2024, 30(8): 1-30.
[18] Vilela M, Morais C, Paiva C J. Inquiry-Based Science Education in High Chemistry: Enhancing Oral and Written Communication Skills Through Authentic and Problem-Based Learning Activities. Education Sciences, 2025, 15(3): 334-334.
[19] Peterson M J, Foldnes N, Jensen T M. Relations between linguistic diversity, classroom social climate, and reading comprehension in Norwegian elementary classrooms. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 2025, 69(4): 682-697.
[20] Gao Y, Xia Q, Qin G, et al. Digital Pathways for Cultivating Cultural Awareness in English Reading Instruction in Primary and Secondary Schools - Based on Digital Pathways for Cultivating Cultural Awareness in English Reading Instruction in Primary and Secondary Schools - Based on the Smart Education of China Platform.Education Journal, 2025, 8(2).