HOW DIGITAL TRADE POLICIES INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF URBAN DIGITAL ECONOMIES
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pp 50-62, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wms3067
Author(s)
YuMei Li1, HaiHui Wang2,3*
Affiliation(s)
1School of Applied Technology, Wuxi University, Wuxi 214105, Jiangsu, China.
2School of Digital Economics and Management, Wuxi University, Wuxi 214105, Jiangsu, China.
3Institute of China (Wuxi) Cross-Border Electronic Commerce Comprehensive Pilot Zone, Wuxi University, Wuxi 214105, Jiangsu, China.
Corresponding Author
HaiHui Wang
ABSTRACT
KEYWORDS
Digital trade plays a crucial role in global economic development, and the impact of related policies on urban digital economies has become a prominent research area. This study conducts qualitative analysis of digital trade policy documents in China, identifying core mechanisms driving urban digital economy growth. Using panel data from 280 Chinese cities (2010-2021), we apply the Difference-in-Differences method, treating Cross-border E-commerce comprehensive pilot areas as a quasi-natural experiment to evaluate digital trade policy impacts on urban digital economic development. Findings reveal that pilot areas significantly boost urban digital economy development. Heterogeneity analysis shows this effect is particularly pronounced in eastern coastal regions, megacities, and the Yangtze River Delta. Mechanism analysis suggests digital trade policies foster urban digital economic development by advancing digital infrastructure, promoting service industry agglomeration, and improving business environments.
CITE THIS PAPER
YuMei Li, HaiHui Wang. How digital trade policies influence the development of urban digital economies. World Journal of Management Science. 2025, 3(2): 50-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wms3067.
REFERENCES
[1] Li J, Fu X. Digital trade promotes the development of digital economy: Mechanism, facts, and suggestions. International Trade, 2024(07): 45–46. DOI: 10.14114/j.cnki.itrade.2024.07.007.
[2] Meltzer J P. Governing digital trade. World Trade Review, 2019, 18(S1): S23–S48.
[3] Shi D, Nie X, Qi F. Globalization of digital economy: technological competition, rule game and China's choice. Journal of Management World, 2023, 39(9): 1-15.
[4] Wang T, Li J, Zhang W. Experience of Digital Trade Development in the United States and Europe and Its Policy Enlightenment to China. International Trade, 2023(02): 57-63+86.
[5] Chen K, Luo S. Cross-border e-commerce development and enterprise digital technology innovation—Empirical evidence from listed companies in China. Heliyon, 2024, 10(15).
[6] Tapscott D. The digital economy: Promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence. Educom Review, 1996, 31: 52–54.
[7] González J L, Ferencz J. Digital trade and market openness. OECD, 2018.
[8] Bukht R, Heeks R. Defining, conceptualising and measuring the digital economy. Development Informatics Working Paper, 2017(68).
[9] Zhang B C, Shen K Y. Quantitative evaluation and characteristics of the development readiness in digital economy for "Belt and Road" countries. Shanghai Journal of Economics, 2018(1): 94–103.
[10] Liu J, Yang Y, Zhang S. Research on the measurement and driving factors of China’s digital economy. Shanghai Journal of Economics, 2020, 6: 81–96. DOI: 10.19626/j.cnki.cn31-1163/f.2020.06.008.
[11] López González J, Jouanjean M. Digital trade: Developing a framework for analysis. OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 205. OECD Publishing, 2017.
[12] Zhang X, Li D. Research on the coupling development of the digital economy, cross-border e-commerce, and digital trade: Application prospect of blockchain technology among them. Theoretical Exploration, 2020(1): 115–121.
[13] Wu J, Luo Z, Wood J. How do digital trade rules affect global value chain trade in services?—Analysis of preferential trade agreements. The World Economy, 2013, 46(10): 3026-3047.
[14] Xiong L, Ye K. Research on the relevance of cross-border e-commerce ecological development and policy combination dimensions. Soft Science, 2020, 34(2): 129–136. DOI: 10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2020.02.21.
[15] Huang S. The origin and present situation of institutional economics. Reform, 2017(1): 132–144.
[16] Wei D, Zhang J. Achievements and prospects on the construction of China's cross-border e-commerce comprehensive pilot area. International Trade, 2019(7): 18–24.
[17] Zhu Z, Jiang F. Does China's export of digital services promote the upgrading of global industrial structure?—Based on the perspective of resource mismatch. International Business (Journal of the University of International Business and Economics), 2022.
[18] Miao Y, Du R, Li J, et al. A two-sided matching model in the context of B2B export cross-border e-commerce. Electronic Commerce Research, 2019, 19: 841–861.
[19] Li Q, Zhao S. The impact of digital economy development on industrial restructuring: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 2023, 15(14): 10847.
[20] Li B, Zhang S. Research on the development path of China’s digital trade under the background of the digital economy. Journal of Internet and Digital Economics, 2020, 2: 1–14.
[21] Solow R M. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 1956, 70(1): 65-94. DOI: 10.2307/1884513.
[22] Zhao T, Zhang Z, Liang S K. Digital economy, entrepreneurship, and high-quality economic development: Empirical evidence from urban China. Management World, 2020(10): 65–76.
[23] Huang Q, Yu Y, Zhang S. Internet development and productivity growth in manufacturing industry: Internal mechanism and China experiences. China Ind. Econ, 2019, 8: 5-23.
[24] Guo F, Wang J, Wang F, et al. Measuring China’s digital financial inclusion: Index compilation and spatial characteristics. China Economic Quarterly, 2020, 19(4): 1401-1418.
[25] Jiang L D, Lu Y, Zhang G F. The construction of the pilot free trade zone and Chinese exports. China Industrial Economics, 2021, 8: 75-93.
[26] Rosenbaum P R, Rubin D B. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 1985, 70(1): 41-55.
[27] Lechner M. Identification and estimation of causal effects of multiple treatments under the conditional independence assumption. Physica-Verlag HD, 2001: 43-58.
[28] Wang Q, Li J, Ding K, et al. Digital infrastructure, factor allocation efficiency, and urban-rural income gap. Statistics and Decision, 2023(09): 29–34.
[29] Wang X, Xie J, Fan Z P. B2C cross-border e-commerce logistics mode selection considering product returns. International Journal of Production Research, 2021, 59(13): 3841–3860.
[30] Han F, Yang L. How does the agglomeration of producer services promote the upgrading of manufacturing structure?: an integrated framework of agglomeration economies and schumpeter’s endogenous growth theory. Management world, 2020, 36(2): 72-94. DOI: 10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2020.0022.
[31] Zhang Y, Cai D, Jia F, et al. The bounded incentive effect of informal institutions: An empirical study of executive compensation incentives based on the regional trust environment. Nankai Business Review International, 2019, 10(2): 207-232.
[32] Herman P R, Oliver S. Trade, policy, and economic development in the digital economy. Journal of Development Economics, 2023, 164: 103135.
[33] Qi X, Qin W, Lin B. Case study on synergistic development strategy of cross-border e-commerce and logistics: An empirically model estimation. Plos one, 2024, 19(6): e0304393.
[34] Ma S, Guo J, Zhang H. Policy analysis and development evaluation of digital trade: An international comparison. China & World Economy, 2019, 27(3): 49-75.
[35] Casalini F, González J L. Trade and cross-border data flows. 2019.
[36] Ruan J, Zou L, Liu R, et al. The Impact of Digital Economy Development on Regional Income Gaps: A Perspective on Multidimensional Inequality Decomposition and Threshold Effects. Mathematics, 2024, 12(24): 4024.
[37] Zhou A. Digital infrastructure and economic growth—Evidence for China. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 2022, 6(1): 1397.