Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.
Open Access

FORGING SKILLED WORKERS IN CHINA: INSIGHTS FROM SINGAPORE, JAPAN, AND SOUTH KOREA

Download as PDF

Volume 3, Issue 4, Pp 36-41, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/tsshr3161

Author(s)

HuaMing Zeng

Affiliation(s)

Shanghai Vocational College of Trade Union, Shanghai 200082, China.

Corresponding Author

HuaMing Zeng

ABSTRACT

China has made notable strides in strengthening its industrial workforce, yet its vocational education and skills development system continues to face structural, institutional, and perceptual challenges. This article examines the critical obstacles within China’s current framework, including regional disparities, social stigma, weak school–industry linkages, and fragmented certification mechanisms. To offer practical insights, the paper compares the vocational training systems of Singapore, Japan, and South Korea—three advanced Asian economies with robust strategies for cultivating skilled labor. By analyzing key features of the high-quality skill development systems for skilled workers in three of Asia's technological powerhouses—Singapore, Japan, and South Korea—this study aims to provide references and insights for China's path toward improving the quality of its high-skilled industrial worker system.

KEYWORDS

High quality education; Skilled workers; Vocational education

CITE THIS PAPER

HuaMing Zeng. Forging skilled workers in China: insights from Singapore, Japan, and South Korea. Trends in Social Sciences and Humanities Research. 2025, 3(4): 36-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/tsshr3161.

REFERENCES

[1] Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security. 2022 Fourth Quarter Most In-Demand Occupations Report. Beijing: MHRSS, 2023. https://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2023-01/18/c_1129297713.htm

[2] Wang Xin, Xu Jiahong. The Realistic Situation and Path Choice of Chinese Industrial Workers’ Skill Formation. Academic Research, 2020, (8): 7. DOI: 10.1007/s11756-021-007XX.

[3] Zhang L, Sun Y. Regional disparities and funding in China’s vocational education system. Educational Development Quarterly, 2021, 29(4): 67-79.

[4] Ren Ruiwen, Xu Han. Singapore as an Example of Path Choice for High Quality Development of Vocational Education. Education and Vocation, 2022, (12): 7.

[5] Skills Future Singapore. Skills Future Overview and Industry Collaboration. 2023.  https://www.skillsfuture.gov.sg

[6] Ministry of Manpower Singapore. Future Skills Jubilee Fund and Lifelong Learning Initiatives. 2020. https://www.mom.gov.sg

[7] Workforce Singapore. Workforce Skills Qualifications (WSQ) Framework. 2022.  https://www.wsg.gov.sg

[8] BROMANN, Silke. Vocational Education and Training in Japan—Recent Trends. Innovation and Change in Japanese Management, 2010, 100-118.

[9] Saito Y, Nakamura K, Fujimoto T. Evolution of vocational education in Japan since the 1990s. Asian Vocational Education Journal, 2020, 11(3): 30-45.

[10] Sawai M. Vocational training and vocational education in postwar Japan: An overview. Japanese Research in Business History, 2020, 37: 1-10.

[11] Kim, Jhong Yun Joy, EunBee Kim, and Doo Hun Lim. "A meta-analysis of the effects of lifelong vocational education in South Korea." European Journal of Training and Development 48.7/8 (2024): 749-765.

[12] Yu Tongtong. Lessons and inspiration from Korea's up-and-down vocational education. Modern Vocational Education. 2021, (36): 150-151.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. sitemap
Copyright © 2017 - 2025 Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.   All Rights Reserved.