Author(s)

Xinke Huang

Affiliation(s)

The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.

Corresponding Author

Xinke Huang

ABSTRACT

Background: The China's cesarean section rate has risen sharply in the past 50 years, so the situation of painless childbirth application should be improved in Chinese medical organization. But the situation information of painless childbirth was lacked in Chinese medical organization. Research aim: The influence factors of painless childbirth are numerous and complex in Chinese hospital so that the aspect of influence factors of painless childbirth had controversy. This study was conducted to summarize and critically evaluate influence factors of painless childbirth in China. Methods: All relevant studies up to September 14, 2017, were include, through comprehensive searches in CNKI, CBM, Wanfang and Wip databases. Results: 18 reports were included from 213 literature. The rate of pregnant woman use painless childbirth is different in different hospital, that the lowest rate is 6.91%, the highest rate is 44.83%, the mean of rate is 28.57%. Similarly, The success rate of painless childbirth is different in different, that the lowest rate is 6.25%, the highest rate is 23.44%, the mean of rate is 15.00%. In terms of the failure rate of anesthesia, the lowest failure rate in hospitals is 11.81%, the highest failure rate in hospitals is 22.00%, the mean of failure rate in hospital is 15.82%. Conclusion: The painless childbirth application of China need more publicity and faster development as barrier of painless childbirth application from the lack of related publicity and the immature technology.

KEYWORDS

Painless Childbirth; Childbirth Problems; Immature Technology.

CITE THIS PAPER

Huang Xinke. Painless childbirth in chinese hospital: a systematic review. Eurasia Journal of Science and Technology. 2019, 1(2): 1-7.

REFERENCES

[1]Aysu, A., & Aytul, C. E., & Eser, S. O., & Arife, A., & Nazli, K., & Husnu, G., & Ozgur, A. (2017). The influence of the systematic birth preparation program on childbirth satisfaction. Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 295(5), 1127-1133.

[2]Bao, C. H., & Ding, S. M., & Ding, X. C. (2011). Demographic and Psychosocial Factors of Painless childbirth Puerperae and Its Intervention Measures. Journal of Hebei Medical University, 32(11), 1288 - 1291.

[3]Christopher, M., & Burkle,& David, A., & Olsen, & Hans, P. S., & Adam, K., & Jacob. (2017). Parturient recall of neuraxial analgesia risks: Impact of labor pain vs no labor pain. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, (36), 158–163.

[4]Cheng, H., & Xie, F. Q., & Sheng, L. M. (2010). Labor analgesia in reducing the rate of cesarean section of social factors. Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine, 33(33), 39 - 40.

[5]Cheng, L. L. (2015). The related factors of epidural labor analgesia to epidural cesarean section anesthesia failure. Chinese Baby, (15), 45.

[6]Deng, F., & Wang, F. L. (2017). Analysis of the related influencing factors of labor analgesic effect in puerpera. Henan Medical Research, 26(9), 1586 - 1587.

[7]Ding, S. M., & Ding, X. C., & Bao, C. H. (2010). Some Factors Affecting Painless childbirth Rate and Improvement Measures. China Modern Doctor, 49(30), 81 - 82.

[8]Fu, Y. Y., & Xu, X. Q., & Yang, W. (2014). Analysis of the Related Factors of Failure to Convert Labor Epidural Analgesia to Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Section. Progress in Modern Biomedicine, 14(8), 1539 - 1541.

[9]Hou, Z. P., & Gao, J., & Zhou, L. (2009). Pre - labor intervention of nitrous oxide inhalation labor analgesia related factors in 80 cases. China Pharmaceuticals, 18(15), 72 - 73.

[10]Jiang, H. W., & Yang, Z. Q., & Tu, B. H. (2016). The causes and remedial measures of the failure of continuous epidural block for labor analgesia. Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine, 39(8), 693 - 696.

[11]Li, C., & Li, S. Y. (2014). Risk factors of epidural labor analgesia to epidural cesarean section anesthesia failure. Medicine & People, (8), 51.

[12]Li, F. H., & Guo, J., & Wei, H. T. (2011). Cause analysis of analgesic labor in 495 cases of caesarean section. Chinese Journal of Misdiagnostics, 11(28), 6938.

[13]Li, Y. N., & Wang, S., & Xu, Y. Y. (2004). Effect of epidural analgesia on childbirth outcome of pregnant women with pih and its cause analysis. Med J NDFNC, 25(4), 283.

[14]Luo, B. R., & Wu, Y., & Li, L. (2013). Study on risk factors for failure to convert labor epidural analgesia to epidural anesthesia for cesarean section. Maternal & Child Health Care of China, 28(9), 1514 - 1516.

[15]Luo, J. N., & Zhang, Z. L., & Bao, S. J. (2013). Clinical analysis of children with severe hand， foot and mouth disease. Health World, (9), 117 - 118.

[16]Mou, B. J. (2017). Analysis of related factors of epidural labor analgesia switch to epidural cesarean section anesthesia failure. Chinese Community Doctors, 33(17), 35 - 36.

[17]Nils, C., & Alexandre, D., & Michal, A., & Jean-Charles, P., & Francois, A., & Patricia, M., & Haim, A. A., & Eric, D., & Marylène, D., & Rebecca, B., & William, D. F. (2015). A Cluster-Randomized Trial to Reduce Cesarean Delivery Rates in Quebec. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 70(9).

[18]Pang, Z., & Wei, T. Q. (2012). The reason analysis of 15 cases of labor analgesia continued to be cesarean section. Health World, 33, 179.

[19]Peng, Q. C., & Fan, J. H., & Hou, H. Y. (2009). Related Reasons of Caesarean Section During the Process of Labor Analgesia. China Modern Doctor, 47(26), 159 - 160.

[20]Shen, X. F., & Yao, Z. L. (2016). Expert consensus on labor analgesia (2016 edition). Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology, 32(8), 816 - 818.

[21]Su, J. L., & Li, Y.W., & Wu, M. G. (2014). Risk factors of epidural labor analgesia in obstetrical department to epidural cesarean section anesthesia failure. Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application, (12), 144 - 145.

[22]Wang, C. Y., & Jin, H. (2017). Analgesic labor on reducing the rate of social factors cesarean section. Health World, 7(18), 118 - 119.

[23]Wang, W. K., & Ye, L. (2012). Analysis of the reason of changing cesarean section during analgesic labor after active period. Journal of Qiqihar University of Medicine, 33(2), 187.

[24]Wu, X. F. (2011). Causes of epidural labor analgesia to cesarean section. Clinical medicine, 31(1), 83 - 84.

[25]Yang, Q., & Liu, Y. H., & Shang, Z. L. (2017). The effect of synergism of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and spirit preventive analgesia on the psychological states of parturients with natural childbirth. Journal of International Psychiatry, 44(3), 503 - 505.

[26]You, Y. (2010). On the effect of labor analgesia in obstetrical clinic. China Foreign Medical Treatment, (29), 180 - 182.

[27]Zhao, H. F. (2017). Risk factors analysis of epidural anesthesia for epidural cesarean section. Chinese and Foreign Medical Research, 15(3), 23 - 24.

[28]Zou, H. L. (2011). Pain-free birth and social factors in reducing the role of caesarean section rate. China Modern Medicine, 18(4), 34 - 35.