Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.
Open Access

OPTIMIZING BLOCK-BY-BLOCK RELOCATION IN HISTORIC URBAN RENEWAL: A HYBRID SIMULATED ANNEALING-GENETIC ALGORITHM APPROACH

Download as PDF

Volume 7, Issue 5, Pp 59-64, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/jcsee3078

Author(s)

MingYu Wang*, ZiHeng Ji

Affiliation(s)

School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, Liaoning, China.

Corresponding Author

MingYu Wang

ABSTRACT

This study presents an innovative computational framework addressing the complex optimization challenges in historic urban renewal through block-by-block relocation strategies. This study develop a hybrid simulated annealing-genetic algorithm (SA-GA) that synergistically combines the global search capability of genetic algorithms with simulated annealing's local optima avoidance mechanism. The model incorporates three critical optimization objectives: (1) maximization of contiguous cleared blocks (demonstrating 28.3% improvement), (2) minimization of resident displacement (achieving 19.7% reduction), and (3) preservation of neighborhood spatial integrity. This study’s comprehensive compensation scheme accounts for multiple architectural factors including housing orientation, unit area differentials, spatial configuration metrics, daylight access preservation, and structural renovation requirements. Computational experiments reveal the SA-GA hybrid's superior performance, showing 24.1% better solution quality and 17.3% faster convergence compared to conventional methods. The framework features: A cost-benefit analysis module identifying optimal ROI thresholds, Resident satisfaction metrics (85.2% acceptance rate in simulations)Implementation cost optimization(23.4% savings potential), Decision-support software implementation  This research contributes both theoretically and practically by: Establishing the first application of SA-GA in urban building relocation, Developing quantifiable fairness assessment metrics, Providing actionable tools for large-scale renewal projects.

KEYWORDS

Urban renewal; Building relocation optimization; Hybrid metaheuristics; Multi-objective decision making; Computational urban planning; SA-GA algorithm

CITE THIS PAPER

MingYu Wang, ZiHeng Ji. Optimizing block-by-block relocation in historic urban renewal: a hybrid simulated annealing-genetic algorithm approach. Journal of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering. 2025, 7(5): 59-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/jcsee3078.

REFERENCES

[1] Wen Y, Haider S A, Boukhris M. Preserving the past, nurturing the future: A systematic literature review on the conservation and revitalization of Chinese historical town environments during modernization. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2023, 11: 1114697. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1114697

[2] Soelistiyono A, Adrianto A T, Kurniawati E. Analyzing the impact of traditional market relocation in surrounding traders and communities (Case Study of Demak Mranggen Markets). Economics and Business Solutions Journal, 2018, 2(1): 35-45.

[3] Zhang C, Li P, Rao Y, et al. A new hybrid GA/SA algorithm for the job shop scheduling problem//Evolutionary Computation in Combinatorial Optimization: 5th European Conference, EvoCOP 2005, Lausanne, Switzerland, March 30-April 1, 2005. Proceedings 5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005: 246-259.

[4] Wu R, Huang M, Yang Z, et al. Pix2Pix-Assisted Beijing Hutong Renovation Optimization Method: An Application to the UTCI and Thermal and Ventilation Performance. Buildings, 2024, 14(7): 1957.

[5] Bagheri M, Shirzadi N, Bazdar E, et al. Optimal planning of hybrid renewable energy infrastructure for urban sustainability: Green Vancouver. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2018, 95: 254-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.037

[6] Nesticò A, Sica F. The sustainability of urban renewal projects: A model for economic multi-criteria analysis. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 2017, 35(4): 397-409.

[7] Ryōichi K. Preservation and revitalization of machiya in Kyoto//Japanese capitals in historical perspective. Routledge, 2013: 367-384.

[8] Espey J, Parnell S, Revi A. The transformative potential of a Global Urban Agenda and its lessons in a time of crisis. Npj Urban Sustainability, 2023, 3(1): 15.

[9] Lin B, Khattak S I, Zhao B. To relocate or not to relocate: a logit regression model of factors influencing corporate headquarter relocation decision in China. SAGE Open, 2021, 11(3): 21582440211032678.

[10] Castells M. Urban renewal and social conflict in Paris. Social Science Information, 1972, 11(2): 93-124.

[11] Lee C S, Thad Barnowe J, McNabb D E. Environmental perceptions, attitudes and priorities: cross‐cultural implications for public policy. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 2005, 12(1): 61-83.

[12] Kerin M, Pham D T. Smart remanufacturing: a review and research framework. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2020, 31(6): 1205-1235.

[13] Marra G, Barosio M, Eynard E, et al. From urban renewal to urban regeneration: Classification criteria for urban interventions. Turin 1995–2015: Evolution of planning tools and approaches. Journal of Urban Regeneration & Renewal, 2016, 9(4): 367-380.

[14] Hummel M, Büchele R, Müller A, et al. The costs and potentials for heat savings in buildings: Refurbishment costs and heat saving cost curves for 6 countries in Europe. Energy and Buildings, 2021, 231: 110454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110454

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. sitemap
Copyright © 2017 - 2025 Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.   All Rights Reserved.