DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF BENIGN PROSTATE LESIONS AND PROSTATIC CANCER USING MONO-EXPONENTIAL, BI-EXPONENTIAL MODELS BASED DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pp 7-12, 2019
Author(s)
Jie Zhang#, Hai-dong Chen#, Li-fen Xie#, Fen-xiong Liang, Yong-jun Peng*, Jun Mao*
Affiliation(s)
Department of Radiology, Zhuhai People’s Hospital (Zhuhai hospital affiliated with Jinan University), Zhuhai 519000, China
Corresponding Author
Yong-jun Peng, Jun Mao
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To evaluate and compare the value of various metrics obtained from mono-exponential model (MEM) and bi-exponential model (BEM). MEM and BEM were based on diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant prostate lesions. Methods: Consecutive 124 patients with pathologically confirmed prostate lesions (4 patients were confirmed prostatitis, 43 patients were confirmed benign prostatic hyperplasia, 30 patients were confirmed prostatitis with hyperplasia, 47 patients were confirmed prostatic cancer) received DWI of MEM and BEM. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from single b-factor range DWI were compared with the ADCslow, ADCfast, ADCstandard and Ffast from extended b-factor range DWI imaging between benign and malignant group. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and One Way ANOVA were performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of different parameters. Results: The mean and normalised ADCslow, ADCfast, Ffast and ADC values were significantly lower in malignant group than those in benign group (P < 0.05). ADCstandard was significantly higher in malignant group than those in benign group (P < 0.05). If the maximum Youden’s index was taken as an optimal cut-off, the diagnostic threshold of ADCslow, ADCfast, ADCstandard, Ffast and ADC was 0.350×10?3 mm2/s, 0.520×10?3 mm2/s, 4.95×10?3 mm2/s, 0.421, 1.05×10?3 mm2/s, respectively. Conclusion: Different models of DWI, including MEM and BEM, are useful in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant prostate lesions. However, ADCslow, ADCfast, Ffast have better diagnostic performance with increased sensitivity and specificity.
KEYWORDS
Prostate cancer; Prostate lesions; Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Diffusion weighted imaging
CITE THIS PAPER
Jie Zhang, Hai-dong Chen, Li-fen Xie, Fen-xiong Liang, Yong-jun Peng, Jun Mao. Differential diagnosis of benign prostate lesions and prostatic cancer using mono-exponential, bi-exponential models based diffusion weighted imaging. Acta Translational Medicine. 2019, 2(1): 7-12.
REFERENCES
[1]. Glazer, I. D, Hassanzadeh, Elmira, Fedorov, Andriy, et al. Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3T for prostate cancer: correlation with tumor cell density and percentage Gleason pattern on whole mount pathology. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2017, 42(3):918-925. Doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-0942-1.
[2]. Malagi AV, Das CJ, Khare K, Calamante F, Mehndiratta A. Effect of combination and number of b values in IVIM analysis with post-processing methodology: simulation and clinical study. MAGMA, 2019, 32(5):519-527. Doi: 10.1007/s10334-019-00764-0.
[3]. Kang KM, Lee JM, Yoon JH, Kiefer B, Han JK, Choi BI. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging for characterization of focal pancreatic lesions. Radiology, 2014, 270(2):444-453. Doi: 10.1148/radiol.13122712.
[4]. Kartalis N, Manikis GC, Loizou L, Albiin N, Zollner FG, Del CM, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of pancreatic cancer: A comparison of mono-exponential, bi-exponential and non-Gaussian kurtosis models. Eur J Radiol Open, 2016, 3:79-85. Doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2016.04.002.
[5]. Zhang P, Min X, Wang L, Feng Z, Ke Z, You H, et al. Bi-exponential versus mono-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging for evaluating prostate cancer aggressiveness after radical prostatectomy: a whole-tumor histogram analysis. Acta Radiol, 2019, 284185119837932. Doi: 10.1177/0284185119837932.
[6]. Ma XZ, Lv K, Sheng JL, Yu YX, Pang PP, Xu MS, et al. Application evaluation of DCE-MRI combined with quantitative analysis of DWI for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Oncol Lett, 2019, 17(3):3077-3084. Doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.9988.
[7]. Kayal EB, Kandasamy D, Khare K, Alampally JT, Bakhshi S, Sharma R, Mehndiratta A. Quantitative Analysis of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) Diffusion MRI using Total Variation and Huber Penalty Function. Med Phys, 2017, 44(11):5849-5858. Doi: 10.1002/mp.12520.
[8]. Xu Y, Xu Q, Sun H, Liu T, Shi K, Wang W. Could IVIM and ADC help in predicting the KRAS status in patients with rectal cancer? Eur Radiol, 2018, 28(7):3059-3065. Doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5329-y.
[9]. Zhang P, Min X, Wang L, Feng Z, Ke Z, You H, et al. Bi-exponential versus mono-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging for evaluating prostate cancer aggressiveness after radical prostatectomy: a whole-tumor histogram analysis. Acta Radiol, 2019, 284185119837932. Doi: 10.1177/0284185119837932.
[10]. Karunamuni RA, Kuperman J, Seibert TM, Schenker N, Rakow-Penner R, Sundar VS, et al. Relationship between kurtosis and bi-exponential characterization of high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging: application to prostate cancer. Acta Radiol, 2018, 59(12):1523-1529. Doi: 10.1177/0284185118770889.
[11]. Shan Y, Chen X, Liu K, Zeng M, Zhou J. Prostate cancer aggressive prediction: preponderant diagnostic performances of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) beyond ADC at 3.0 T scanner with Gleason score at final pathology. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2019, 44(10):3441-3452. Doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02075-3.
[12]. Naganawa S, Sato C, Kumada H, Ishigaki T, Miura S, Takizawa O. Apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer of the uterus: comparison with the normal uterine cervix. Eur Radiol, 2005, 15(1):71-78. Doi: 10.1007/s00330-004-2529-4.
[13]. Yang DM, Kim HC, Kim SW, Jahng GH, Won KY, Lim SJ, Oh JH. Prostate cancer: correlation of intravoxel incoherent motion MR parameters with Gleason score. Clin Imaging, 2016, 40(3):445-450. Doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.01.001.
[14]. Park HJ, Sung YS, Lee SS, Lee Y, Cheong H, Kim YJ, Lee MG. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI of the abdomen: The effect of fitting algorithms on the accuracy and reliability of the parameters. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2017, 45(6):1637-1647. Doi: 10.1002/jmri.25535.
[15]. Jeon TY, Kim CK, Kim JH, Im GH, Park BK, Lee JH. Assessment of early therapeutic response to sorafenib in renal cell carcinoma xenografts by dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Br J Radiol, 2015, 88(1053):20150163. Doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150163.
[16]. Jha P, Yeh BM, Zagoria R, Collisson E, Wang ZJ. The Role of MR Imaging in Pancreatic Cancer. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, 2018, 26(3):363-373. Doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2018.03.004.