Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.
Open Access

DYNAMIC EVALUATION OF OPPORTUNITY INEQUALITY AND POLICY OPTIMIZATION VIA THE HST-GBM MODEL

Download as PDF

Volume 3, Issue 6, Pp 40-45, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/tsshr3181

Author(s)

Han Wu*, RuoShi Wang, YuQi He

Affiliation(s)

School of Statistics, Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, Tianjin 300222, China.

Corresponding Author

Han Wu

ABSTRACT

In the context of China’s rapid economic development and structural transformation, inequality of opportunity has become a major obstacle to upward mobility and the achievement of common prosperity. This study proposes an innovative Hybrid Spatiotemporal Gating-Boosted Model (HST-GBM), integrating LSTM, XGBoost, fixed-effects models, and gated recurrent units, to address the limitations of traditional methods in capturing nonlinear, heterogeneous, and intertemporal dynamics. Using CFPS panel data from 2010 to 2022, the study examines the evolution of opportunity inequality and its key drivers. First, the model effectively quantifies the relative impact of individual effort and environmental factors, revealing a long-term trend of declining inequality and increasing influence of personal effort. Second, the analysis shows that opportunity structures are highly responsive to policy changes, with effort-related impacts intensifying during reform windows. Finally, the study offers targeted policy recommendations that emphasize adaptive algorithms and effort-oriented approaches. Overall, this research contributes by advancing methodological innovation, enriching the theoretical understanding of dynamic inequality, and providing empirical support for policies aimed at promoting social equity and long-term stability.

KEYWORDS

Inequality of opportunity; Common prosperity; LSTM; XGBoost; HST-GBM

CITE THIS PAPER

Han Wu, RuoShi Wang, YuQi He. Dynamic evaluation of opportunity inequality and policy optimization via the HST-GBM model. Trends in Social Sciences and Humanities Research. 2025, 3(6): 40-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/tsshr3181.

REFERENCES

[1] Roemer J E. Equality of Opportunity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998.

[2] Roemer J E. Theories of Distributive Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2012.

[3] Zhang N, Lin J, Li J. Research on inequality of opportunity in basic education. China Industrial Economics, 2020(08): 42-59.

[4] Chen M, Zhou Y. New progress in digital inequality research. Economic Review, 2022(04): 123-139.

[5] Shi X, Chen T, Fang S. Common prosperity from the perspective of equal opportunities: Evidence from low-income groups. Economic Research Journal, 2022(09): 99-117.

[6] Guo Q, Li Y. Educational opportunity inequality and social mobility research. Nanjing Journal of Finance and Economics, 2022(01): 1-14.

[7] Wan X, Zhang C, Tang L. Re-estimation of income opportunity inequality in China: New findings from machine learning. Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 2024(01): 192-212.

[8] Liu X, Han Y. Social mobility and educational equity: Theory and evidence. Social Science Research, 2024(01): 110-128.

[9] Liu J, Zhao J. New trends of educational inequality in China and governance strategies. Journal of Educational Economics Review, 2025(02): 45-62.

[10] Xue Y. How much does effort matter for occupational attainment? An extension of the “ascription–achievement” model. Population & Economics, 2025(04): 89-101.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. sitemap
Copyright © 2017 - 2025 Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.   All Rights Reserved.