THE NEXT GENERATION OF PHOTOVOLTAICS: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF EMERGING MATERIALS, PROSPECTS, AND CHALLENGES
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pp 43-50, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wjmp3016
Author(s)
XiYuan Zhang*, XiZhi Zhang
Affiliation(s)
Portola High School, Irvine 92618, Orange County, U.S.A.
Corresponding Author
XiYuan Zhang
ABSTRACT
This paper reviews the evolution of photovoltaic (PV) technologies, beginning with the commercialization of first- and second-generation PV technologies. Introducing their characteristics, market share, and current limitations, respectively. Then, bring in the main focus of the paper — the third generation PV technologies — copper zinc tin sulfide, perovskite solar cells, organic photovoltaics, quantum dot solar cells, and dye sensitized solar cells — were analyzed in terms of their characteristics, design, power conversion efficiency, and scalability. The analysis underscores the importance of current third-generation PV technologies innovation, highlighting the strong potential of third-generation PV technology to overcome the technology bottleneck of first and second-generation PV technologies and establish a solid ground for assuming a leading role in the global sustainable energy market.
KEYWORDS
Copper zinc tin sulfide; Perovskite solar cells; Organic photovoltaics; Quantum dot solar cells; Dye sensitized solar cells; Photovoltaic technologies
CITE THIS PAPER
XiYuan Zhang, XiZhi Zhang. The next generation of Photovoltaics: a comprehensive review of emerging materials, prospects, and challenges. World Journal of Mathematics and Physics. 2025, 3(1): 43-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wjmp3016.
REFERENCES
[1] Syed T H, Wei W. Technoeconomic analysis of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) with WS?/carbon composite as counter electrode material. Inorganics, 2022, 10(11): 191.
[2] Milman O. ‘Invisible killer’: Fossil fuels caused 8.7m deaths globally in 2018, research finds. The Guardian, 2021. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/feb/09/fossil-fuels-pollution-deaths-research.
[3] Natural Resources Defense Council. Fracking 101. Natural Resources Defense Council, n.d. Available at: https://www.nrdc.org/stories/fracking-101.
[4] Sargent E H. Colloidal quantum dot photovoltaics. Nature Photonics, 2012, 6(3): 133–135.
[5] Bhambhani A. New “World Record” For CIGS Solar Cells Efficiency. TaiyangNews, 2024 Mar 7. Available at: https://taiyangnews.info/technology/new-world-record-for-cigs-solar-cells-efficiency.
[6] Solar Magazine. Thin-film solar panels: An in-depth guide. Solar Magazine, 2022 Mar 12. Available at: https://solarmagazine.com/solar-panels/thin-film-solar-panels/.
[7] Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE. Photovoltaics Report. Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE, 2025. Available at: https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/en/publications/studies/photovoltaics-report.html
[8] National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Best Research-Cell Efficiency Chart. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2025 Jul 15. Available at: https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html.
[9] Zeghdar K, Mansouri S, Dehimi L, et al. Optimizing photovoltaic efficiency in CZTS solar cells by investigating the role of different advanced materials as back surface field layer. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15(1): 25294.
[10] Wang A, Chen C, Liao M, et al. Analysis of manufacturing cost and market niches for Cu?ZnSnS? (CZTS) solar cells. Sustainable Energy and Fuels, 2021, 5(4): 1044–1058. DOI: 10.1039/D0SE01734E.
[11] Jackson P, Hariskos D, Wuerz R, et al. Properties of Cu(In,Ga)Se? solar cells with new record efficiencies up to 21.7%. Physica Status Solidi (RRL)–Rapid Research Letters, 2015, 9(1): 28–31. DOI: 10.1002/pssr.20140952.
[12] Tong Y, Li S, Zhang W, et al. Wide-bandgap organic–inorganic lead halide perovskite solar cells. Proceedings of the Advanced Photovoltaics Conference, 2022: 34–42.
[13] Li J, Sun K, Yuan X, et al. Emergence of flexible kesterite solar cells: Progress and perspectives. NPJ Flexible Electronics, 2023, 7(1):16.
[14] U.S. Department of Energy. Cadmium telluride photovoltaics perspective paper. Solar Energy Technologies Office, n.d. Available at: https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/cadmium-telluride-photovoltaics-perspective-paper.
[15] Energy Education. Photovoltaic effect. Energy Education, n.d. Available at: https://energyeducation.ca/encyclopedia/Photovoltaic_effect.
[16] Kirmani A R, Luther J M, Abolhasani M, et al. Colloidal quantum dot photovoltaics: Current progress and path to gigawatt scale enabled by smart manufacturing. ACS Energy Letters, 2020, 5(9): 3069–3100.
[17] National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Best Research-Cell Efficiency Chart. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2025 Jul 15. Available at: https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html.
[18] ScienceDirect. Amorphous silicon solar cell. ScienceDirect, n.d. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/materials-science/amorphous-silicon-solar-cell.
[19] Li G, Zhu R, Yang Y. Polymer solar cells. Nature Photonics, 2012, 6(3):153–161.
[20] Gershon T, Gunawan O. Kesterite CZTSSe thin film solar cells: Current status and future prospects. RSC Publishing, 2023.
[21] Yang C, Hu W, Liu J, et al. Achievements, challenges, and future prospects for industrialization of perovskite solar cells. Light: Science and Applications, 2024, 13(1): 227.
[22] Shi J, Lou L, Gong Y, et al. Multinary alloying for facilitated cation exchange and suppressed charge losses in CZTSSe absorbers. Journal of Energy Materials, 2024, 15(3): 145–160.
[23] Tang Z, Ding L. The voltage loss in organic solar cells. Journal of Semiconductors, 2023, 44(1): 010202. DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/1/010202.
[24] Katagiri H. Cu?ZnSnS? thin film solar cells. Thin Solid Films, 2009, 517(7): 2455–2460.
[25] O’Regan B, Gr?tzel M. A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO? films. Nature, 1991, 353(6346): 737–740.
[26] Krebs F C. Estimating the manufacturing cost of purely organic solar cells. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 2009, 93(2): 394–412.
[27] Uzun B, Asil D. Unveiling the potential of direct synthesized PbS CQD ink based solar cells through numerical simulation. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14: 27256. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-75981-2.
[28] Smith B L, Woodhouse M, Horowitz K A W, et al. Photovoltaic (PV) module technologies: 2020 benchmark costs and technology evolution framework results. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2021. Available at: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy22osti/78173.pdf.
[29] NREL. Solar manufacturing cost analysis. Solar Market Research & Analysis, n.d. Available at: https://www.nrel.gov/solar/market-research-analysis/solar-manufacturing-cost.

Download as PDF