Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.
Open Access

MULTIDIMENSIONAL EVALUATION OF AN INTELLIGENT REVIEWING SYSTEM USING THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)

Download as PDF

Volume 3, Issue 6, Pp 13-19, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wjes3084

Author(s)

ZiYuan Guo*, Yue Wang, XinRu Yin

Affiliation(s)

Department of Economics, Shanxi Engineering Science and Technology Vocational University, Jinzhong 030600, Shanxi, China.

Corresponding Author

ZiYuan Guo

ABSTRACT

With the rapid development of artificial intelligence, the application of intelligent marking system in exam marking has become the core direction of education. As this intelligent marking system involves the influence of a variety of human, machine and other subjective and objective factors, its evaluation accuracy may be subject to certain limitations, which brings certain challenges to the diversity and complexity of the implementation steps. In response to this problem, this study selects the method of hierarchical analysis (AHP). Firstly, it establishes a systematic a multilevel evaluation framework, and then establishes a systematic and multilevel evaluation framework, and then establishes a scientific multidimensional index system that a data-driven algorithm fusion strategy is proposed. Experimental results show the diversity and complexity of the implementation steps in response to this problem based on the in-depth analysis of the scoring rules by machine learning algorithms, the system can automate the evaluation of open-ended questions, and combine the manual review and data analysis to construct a new evaluation system of "intelligence-led- artificial gatekeeper". The study proves that the AHP algorithm proposed in effectively enhances the accuracy and feedback effect of intelligent assessment, which is a substantial achievement in this field.

KEYWORDS

Multi-level; Data-driven; AHP; Intelligent reviewing

CITE THIS PAPER

ZiYuan Guo, Yue Wang, XinRu Yin. Multidimensional evaluation of an intelligent reviewing system using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). World Journal of Educational Studies. 2025, 3(6): 13-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wjes3084.

REFERENCES

[1] Mondragon AEC, Mastrocinque E, Tsai JF, et al. An AHP and Fuzzy AHP Multifactor Decision Making Approach for Technology and Supplier Selection in the High-Functionality Textile Industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2021, 68(4): 1112-1125.

[2] Xie R, Asad UH, Linsen M, et al. SmartQuant: CXL-Based AI Model Store in Support of Runtime Configurable Weight Quantization. IEEE Computer Architecture Letters. 2024, 23(2): 199-202.

[3] Barzamini H, Nazaritiji F, Brockmann A, et al. An AI-driven Requirements Engineering Framework Tailored for Evaluating AI-Based Software. 2025 IEEE/ACM 4th International Conference on AI Engineering–Software Engineering for AI (CAIN). 2025: 138-149.

[4] Can GF, Toktas P, Pakdil F. Six Sigma Project Prioritization and Selection Using AHP-CODAS Integration: A Case Study in Healthcare Industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2023, 70(10): 3587-3600.

[5] Tang H, Fong Z, Hu Q. Research on the Evaluation Index System of Teaching Effect of Course Civics Based on OBE Concept and AHP Method. Western Quality Education. 2025, 11(13): 73-77.

[6] Zhao K, Dai Y, Ji Y, et al. Decision-Making Model to Portfolio Selection Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) With Expert Knowledge. IEEE Access. 2021, 9: 76875-76893.

[7] Cooper N, Krizan J. Selection of Climate Change Monitoring Indicators for the National Parks of the Northern Bioregion. 2006 IEEE EIC Climate Change Conference. 2006: 1-5.

[8] Xie Y. Empirical Research on the Reform of Student Evaluation Strategy in a Certain College in Xi'an Based on AHP. Heilongjiang Science. 2025, 16(11): 123-125.

[9] Wang JF, Tong JJ. Construction and Empirical Research of the Evaluation Index System for Scientific and Technological Innovation in Jiangxi Province. Science and Technology Review. 2023(2): 87-96.

[10] Li XY, Chen JQ. Comparability Evaluation of Scientific Research Papers and the Generation Method of Comparative Citations. Journal of Computer Applications. 2025(6): 1888-1894.

[11] Yong X, Dong XC, Xu W, et al. Progressive Depth Map Super-resolution Reconstruction Based on Multi-scale Feature Fusion and Correction. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress. 2025: 1-18.

[12] Wu XW, Wang H, Yang Z, et al. Scheme Comparison of Planar Intersections on the East Ring Road in Nairobi, Kenya Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process. Highway. 2025(6): 62-67.

[13] Hou DL, Han SQ, Yang H. Research on the Value Evaluation of Data Assets in Power Grid Enterprises: An Analysis Based on the B-S Model. Price: Theory & Practice. 2025: 1-8.

[14] Wu HJ, Chen CS, Gong YY, et al. Accelerating the Transformation of Scientific and Technological Achievements to Promote the Construction of a Strong Agricultural Province: A Case Study of Sichuan Province. Agricultural Science and Technology Management. 2025: 1-9.

[15] Yang CD, Peng Z, Xiao J, et al. Comparative Analysis and Applicability Study of Stability Calculation Methods for Rigid Pile Composite Foundation. Subgrade Engineering. 2025: 1-8.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. sitemap
Copyright © 2017 - 2025 Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.   All Rights Reserved.