LEARNER IDENTITY CONSTRUCTION OF CHINESE AS A FOREIGN OR SECOND LANGUAGE (CFL/CSL): A NARRATIVE INQUIRY
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pp 32-38, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wjll3013
Author(s)
Astanova Elmira, Hang Yu*
Affiliation(s)
School of Foreign Studies, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710000, Shaanxi, China.
Corresponding Author
Hang Yu
ABSTRACT
This study examines how learners of Chinese as a foreign or second language (CFL/CSL) construct and negotiate their identities within the socio-cultural context of China. Using a qualitative research design, data were collected through written narratives and semi-structured interviews with international university students studying Chinese in China. The analysis focused on key themes such as linguistic self-confidence, cultural adaptation, and bilingual identity, with a word cloud employed as a supplementary analytical tool. The findings indicate that most participants recognized a close relationship between language learning and identity formation, acknowledging the influence of Chinese language learning on their linguistic and cultural selves. However, some learners viewed CFL learning primarily as foreign language acquisition rather than identity development. These results highlight the diversity and complexity of identity construction among CFL/CSL learners in a target-language environment. The study contributes to learner identity research and offers pedagogical implications for supporting learners’ linguistic and cultural development in academic and social contexts in China.
KEYWORDS
Social Identity Theory; Learner Identity; Chinese as a Foreign or Second Language (CFL/CSL); Narrative Inquiry
CITE THIS PAPER
Astanova Elmira, Hang Yu. Learner identity construction of Chinese as a Foreign or Second Language (CFL/CSL): a narrative inquiry. World Journal of Linguistics and Literature. 2025, 2(1): 32-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wjll3013.
REFERENCES
[1] Belcher D, Lukkarila L. Identity in the ESP context. In D. Belcher, A. Johns, & B. Paltridge (Eds.), New directions for English for specific purposes research. University of Michigan Press, 2011: 73–93.
[2] Tajfel H, Turner JC. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Worchel S, Austin WG, editors. Psychology of Intergroup Relations. 2nd ed. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1986: 7-24.
[3] Jenkins R. Social Identity. 4th ed. London: Routledge, 2019.
[4] Raia F. Identity development in a globalized world: A dynamic perspective. Journal of Social Psychology, 2018, 158(6): 721-734.
[5] Topolewska E, Siedzik E, Cieciuch J. Development and validation of the identity formation modes measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 2018, 123: 47-56.
[6] Block D. Destabilized identities and cosmopolitanism across language and cultural borders. Applied Linguistics, 2002, 23(1): 1-27.
[7] Block D. Language and Identity. London: Continuum, 2007a.
[8] Gao Y, Cheng Y, Zhao Y, et al. Self-identity changes and English learning among Chinese undergraduates. World Englishes, 2005, 24(1): 39-51.
[9] Le Page RB, Tabouret-Keller A. Acts of Identity: Creole-Based Approaches to Language and Ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
[10] Norton B. Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 1995, 29(1): 9-31.
[11] Norton B. Identity and Language Learning: Gender, Ethnicity and Educational Change. London: Longman, 2000.
[12] Pavlenko A, Blackledge A, editors. Negotiation of Identities in Multilingual Contexts. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 2004
[13] Longabaugh R. Factors influencing second language acquisition. Language Learning, 1966, 16(3-4): 243-254.
[14] Belyaev BN. Essays on the Psychology of Foreign Language Teaching. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1965.
[15] Leontiev AN. Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Moscow: Smysl, 2004.
[16] Vygotsky LS. Thought and Language. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe Izdatel’stvo, 1956.
[17] Zimnaya IA. Psychology of Teaching Foreign Languages. Moscow: Logos, 2013.
[18] McCarthey SJ, Moje EB. Identity matters. Reading Research Quarterly, 2002, 37(2): 228-238.
[19] Moje EB. Re-framing adolescent literacy research for new times: Studying youth as a resource. Reading Research Quarterly, 2002, 37(2): 211-220.
[20] Erikson EH. Childhood and Society. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1951.
[21] Gao Y, Zhou Y, Cheng Y, et al. Language learning and identity construction: A sociocultural perspective. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 2015, 14(2): 98-113.
[22] Spencer-Oatey H. (Re)presenting identity in intercultural communication. In: Spencer-Oatey H, editor. Language, Culture and Identity. London: Continuum, 2005: 1-15.
[23] Norton B. Language, identity, and the ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly, 1997, 31(3): 409-429.
[24] Norton B. Identity and Language Learning: Extending the Conversation. 2nd ed. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 2013.
[25] Norton B. Identity and poststructuralist theory in SLA. In: Mercer S, Williams M, editors. Multiple Perspectives on the Self in SLA. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 2014: 59-72
[26] Hall S. Identity and Cultural Change. London: Sage Publications, 2002.
[27] Hogg MA, Abrams D. Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes. London: Routledge, 1988.
[28] Stets JE, Burke PJ. Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 2000, 63(3): 224-237.
[29] Hogg MA, Terry DJ. Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 2000, 25(1): 121-140.
[30] Deaux K. Social Identity. London: Psychology Press, 2002.
[31] Anwaruddin SM. Learner identity in second language education: A sociocultural perspective. Canadian Modern Language Review, 2012, 68(4): 409-430.
[32] Flórez González L. Identity and participation in second language learning. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 2018, 17(1): 1-15.
[33] Norton B. Identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 2006, 40(2): 475-481.
[34] Norton B. The practice of theory in the language classroom. Language Teaching, 2011, 44(3): 319-330.
[35] Chee MJ. Identity formation and second language learning. Language and Education, 2003, 17(2): 95-108.
[36] Canagarajah AS. Subversive identities, pedagogical safe houses, and critical learning. TESOL Quarterly, 2004, 38(1): 116-137.
[37] Norton B, McKinney C. An identity approach to second language acquisition. In: Atkinson D, editor. Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge, 2011: 73-94.
[38] Shi L. Language, identity, and intercultural communication. Journal of Language and Intercultural Communication, 2006, 6(1): 1-16.
[39] Patton MQ. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002.
[40] Pavlenko A, Lantolf JP. Second language learning as participation and the (re)construction of selves. In: Lantolf JP, editor. Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 155–177.
[41] Ashforth BE, Schinoff BS. Identity under construction: How individuals come to define themselves in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2016, 3: 111-137.
[42] Moje EB, Luke A. Literacy and identity: Examining the metaphors in history and contemporary research. Reading Research Quarterly, 2009, 44(4): 415-437.
[43] McNaught C, Lam P. Using Wordle as a supplementary research tool. The Qualitative Report, 2010, 15(3): 630-643.
[44] Ramlo SE. Mixed methods research design with word clouds: Enhancing visual interpretation. The Qualitative Report, 2011, 16(1): 230-239.
[45] Pithouse-Morgan K, Van Laren L, Chisanga T, et al. Learning from word clouds: Possibilities for educational research. Qualitative Research Journal, 2015, 15(3): 147-160.
[46] Viégas FB, Wattenberg M. Tag clouds and the case for vernacular visualization. Interactions, 2008, 15(4): 49-52.

Download as PDF