Author(s)

Linda Boarman

Affiliation(s)

Faculty of Business & Law, UWE, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK.

Corresponding Author

Linda Boarman

ABSTRACT

Based on the perspective of socio-technical systems, research from four levels: personal, social, organizational and technical KMS theoretical model of knowledge sharing and try to find the impact key factors affecting knowledge sharing. Use multiple theoretical perspectives such as social capital theory and cognitive theory to establish a basis for KMS knowledge sharing factor model, using PLS The structural equation pair comes from 97 companies Empirical research on 183 valid samples shows that although variables at all levels have an impact on the dependent variable has a significant role, but social capital has a significant impact on KMS The effect of knowledge sharing is the most significant, followed by the personal, technical and organizational levels respectively. Therefore, the enterprise The industry should focus on cultivating organizational social capital based on comprehensive management measures and utilize Web 2.0 information technology etc. KMS Support employee social capital The development of this book promotes knowledge sharing, and finally summarizes two misunderstandings in knowledge sharing management.

KEYWORDS

Knowledge management system; KNOWLEDGE Sharing; Multiple perspectives; PLS structural equation

CITE THIS PAPER

Linda Boarman. KMS knowledge sharing research based on multiple perspectives. World Journal of Information and Knowledge Management. 2023, 1(2): 7-14. DOI:10.61784/wjikm231257.

REFERENCES

[1] EDMONDSON AC. The competitive imperative of learning . Harvard Business Review, 20 08, 86 (7-8): 60

[2] Zheng Wansong, Sun Xiaolin, Wang Kanliang. Knowledge based on social capital and planned behavior theory Research on influencing factors of knowledge sharing . Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University: Social Sciences Edition, 2014 (1): 43-48

[3] Hu Ping, Wu Yong. Integrated components of the mechanism of knowledge sharing behavior of employees in knowledge-based enterprises analytical framework research . Technology Management Research, 2014 (2): 124 -130

[4] FARAJ S, JOHNSON S L. Network exchange patterns in online com- munities. Organization Science, 2011, 22 (6): 1464 -1480

[5] MA M, AGARWAL R. Through a glass darkly: Information technol- ogy design, identity verification, and knowledge contribution in On- line communities . Information Systems Research, 2007, 18 (1): 42-67

[6] GEE WOO B, YOUNG -GUL K. Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Infor- mation Resources Management Journal, 2002, 15 (2): 14-2121

[7] WASKO M M, FARAJ S. Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 2005, 29 (1): 35-57

[8] HSU C L, LIN J C C. Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of tech- nology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation . Information ＆ amp, Management, 2008, 45 (1): 65-74

[9] NAHAPIET J, GHOSHAL S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Re- view, 1998, 23 (2): 242-266

[10] TSAI W, GHOSHAL S. Social capital and value creation: An em- pirical study of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 1998, 41 (4): 464-476

[11] BEHREND F D, ERWEE R. Mapping knowledge flows in virtual teams with SNA. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2009, 13 (4): 99 -114

[12] NONAKA I. Organizational knowledge creation theory: Evolutionary paths and future advances. Organization Studies, 2006, 27 (8): 1179 -1208

[13] BAGOZZI R P, DHOLAKIA U M. Intentional social action in virtu- al communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2002, 16 (2): 2-21

[14] LESSER E L, J STORCK. Communities of practice and organiza- tional performance. IBM Systems Journal, 2001, 40 (4):831-841

[15] AYOUNG S, KYUNG -SHIK S, MANJU A, et al. The influence of virtuality on social networks within and across work groups: A multilevel approach. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2011, 28 (1): 351-386

[16] BARTOL K M, SRIVASTAVA A. Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 2002, 9 (1): 64-76

[17] LEE H, CHOI B. Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2003, 20 (1): 179-228

[18] PETTER S, STRAUB D W, RAI A. Specifying formative con- structs in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 2007, 31 (4): 623-656

[19] BOLLEN K, LENNOX R. Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective . Psychological Bulletin, 1991, 110 (2): 305

[20] HUIGANG L, SARAF N, QING H, et al. Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quarterly, 2007, 31 (1): 59-87 

[21] BULGURCU B, CAVUSOGLU H, BENBASAT I. Information security policy compliance: An empirical study of rationality-based beliefs and information security awareness. MIS Quarterly, 2010, 34 (3): 523-548