Author(s)

Hong Sun

Affiliation(s)

Faculty of Civil Engineering & Architecture, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China.

Corresponding Author

Hong Sun

ABSTRACT

China's large number of famous historical and cultural cities, towns and villages are solid carriers for the strategic decision-making of "vigorously promoting the construction of ecological civilization". Since the 1980s, protection plans for historical and cultural cities have been implemented throughout the country. However, they often encounter breakthroughs at various spatial levels, and there is an urgent need to conduct extensive testing of the implementation of protection plans. However, the content system and standard system for the evaluation of the implementation of protection plans for historical and cultural cities in my country are dually complex. Existing studies rely on empirical judgment and qualitative description in evaluation methods. In terms of evaluation standards, they not only lack objectivity measurement and resident feedback measurement, but also Lack of an operational model construction method. This article proposes that in the future, a theoretical system for the implementation evaluation of historical and cultural city protection plans should be established based on the multi-criteria decision-making method to provide ideas for improving the systematicness and operability of the famous city evaluation system.

KEYWORDS

Urban planning implementation evaluation; Historical and cultural city protection planning; Urban planning post-evaluation

CITE THIS PAPER

Hong Sun. A review of research on the implementation evaluation of protection plans for historical and cultural cities. Academic Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering. 2024, 2(1): 17-23. DOI: 10.61784/ajace240103.

REFERENCES

[1] Zeng Shuhuai, Meng Chao. Assessment of Chinese historical towns under the standards for World Heritage application. Shanghai Urban Planning, 2009 (6): 129-132.

[2] Mac Kee, J. Conserving Cultural BuiltHeritage in South and Southeast Asia: A Conceptual Framework for the Conservation of Non-secular Built Heritage Based on the Philosophical and Cultural Experiences of the Region. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller, 2009 .

[3] Guo Zhan. "Xi'an Declaration"-New Guidelines for Environmental Protection of Cultural Heritage. Chinese Cultural Heritage, 2005 (6): 6-7.

[4] Li Wangming. Research on evaluation of urban master planning implementation. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press, 2007.

[5] Lai Shigang. Review of research on urban planning implementation effect evaluation. Planner, 2010, 26 (3): 10-13.

[6] Sun Shiwen, Zhou Yu. Theory and methods of urban planning implementation evaluation. Urban Planning Transactions, 2003 (3): 15-20.

[7] Xing Gurui. Research on the evaluation framework of urban master planning implementation effects. Urban Issues, 2013, 215(6): 23-27.

[8] Wei Mengkun. Discussion on the content of urban master planning implementation evaluation. Urban Development Research, 2010, 17(4): 54-58.

[9] Hong Wuyang, et al. Research on evaluation methods for the implementation of overall land use planning. Land and Resources Science and Technology Management, 2013, 30(5): 68-73.

[10] Li Hong, Deng Hongdi, Wang Heng. Design concept of land use planning implementation evaluation system. Land and Resources Science and Technology Management, 2013, 30(3): 127-131.

[11] Ouyang Peng. Preliminary study on urban planning evaluation models and methods from the perspective of public policy. Urban Planning, 2008, 32(12): 22-28.

[12] He Lingcong. Research on evaluation methods and mechanisms of urban master planning implementation based on dynamic maintenance. Planner, 2013, 29(6): 18-23.

[13] Tian Li, Lu Chuanting, Shen Tiyan. Theoretical and empirical research on the implementation evaluation of urban master planning-taking Guangzhou master plan (2001-2 010) as an example. Urban Planning Journal, 2008, 177 (5): 90-100.

[14] Luo Tai, Xu Jingyun, Hu Lili. Planning implementation evaluation and development suggestions for Lingang New City. Shanghai Urban Planning, 2009, 87 (4): 39-42.

[15] He Yin, He Lewen. Practice and Enlightenment of Xiangtan Urban Master Planning Implementation Evaluation. Chinese and Foreign Architecture, 2013 (11): 65-67.

[16] Cheng Maoji, Wang Bo. Evaluation of the implementation of Nanjing’s urban master plan and related thoughts. Modern Urban Research, 2011 (4): 88-96.

[17] Zhao Min, Wang Jun, Liu Feng. About the system construction of urban master plan implementation evaluation—taking Bengbu city master plan implementation evaluation as an example. Shanghai Urban Planning, 2013 (3): 18-22.

[18] Yin Hongling, Chen Youchuan, Zhang Junmin. Thoughts on improving urban master planning preparation caused by planning implementation evaluation—taking the implementation evaluation of "Jiaonan City Master Plan (2004-2020)" as an example. Planner, 2012, 28(9):112-115.

[19] Jian Fengmin, Wu Jiang. Research on the connotation and methods of post-implementation evaluation of residential area planning. Shanghai Urban Planning, 2006, 68(3): 46-51.

[20] Sun Shiwen, Zhang Meiliang. Preliminary study on urban design implementation evaluation-taking the urban design of Jing'an Temple area in Shanghai as an example. Urban Planning 2007, 31 (4): 42-47.

[21] Wei Fan. Enlightenment and reflections on the implementation evaluation of the protection plan of the Three Lanes and Seven Alleys Historical and Cultural Districts in Fuzhou. Fujian Architecture, 2013 (5): 4-5.

[22] Gu Wenyue. Research on the implementation evaluation of Wuhan’s historical and cultural city protection plan. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2012.

[23] Li Jing. Research on the Implementation Evaluation of Cuiheng Historical and Cultural Village Protection Plan. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2011.

[24] Song Yan, Chen Yanping. Urban Planning Assessment Guidelines. Beijing: China Construction Industry Press, 2012.

[25] Chan, EHW ,J. Hou.Developing a Framework to Appraise the Critical Success Factors of Transfer Development Rights (TDRs) for Built Heritage Conservation. Habitat International, 2015. 46(0): 35-43.

[26] Kovacs, JF, K. Jonas Galvin, R. Shipley. Assessing the Success of Heritage Conservation Districts:Insights from Ontario, Canada. Cities.

[27] Amit-Cohen, I. Synergy between Urban Planning, Conservation of the Cultural Built Heritage and Functional Changes in the Old Urban Center—The Case of TelAviv. Land Use Policy, 2005. 22(4): 291-300.

[28] Monteiro, V., M. Painho, E. Vaz. Is the Heritage Really Important? A Theoretical Framework for Heritage Reputation Using Citizen Sensing. Habitat International, 2015, 45, Part 2(0): 156- 162.

[29] Brandon, PS, Lombardi, PL Evaluating Sustainable Development in the Built environment. 2nded. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.

[30] Sun Shiwen. On the evaluation and research of urban planning implementation. //Sun Shiwen, Sang Jin. The 54th issue of "Urban Planning Review". Shanghai: Tongji University Press, 2012.

[31] Dutta, M. and Z. Husain. An application of Multi-criteria Decision Makingto Builtheritage. The Case ofCalcutta. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2009, 10(2): 237-243.

[32] Wang, W. M. , et al. An Integrated Decision Making Modelfor District Revitalization and Regeneration Project Selection. Decision Support Systems, 2013, 54(2): 1092-1103.