Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.
Open Access

GEOPHYSICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF OPENING AND CLOSING STRUCTURES AT DIFFERENT SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL SCALES

Download as PDF

Volume 2, Issue 2, Pp 13-20, 2024

DOI: 10.61784/ajesv2n272

Author(s)

Jordan Wofsy

Affiliation(s)

Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Corresponding Author

Jordan Wofsy

ABSTRACT

Opening and closing tectonics is a new hypothesis that studies the opening and closing movement of the earth and its tectonic characteristics, analyzes the formation mechanism of the opening and closing tectonic system, and explores the origin and evolution of the earth. Opening and closing structures at different spatial and temporal scales have different geological manifestations and require research from different angles. Taking the giant open-closed tectonic area in Asia, Europe and Africa, the large-scale open-closed tectonic area in the Mediterranean, and the medium-sized open-closed tectonic area in East Dabie as examples, the application of the open-closed tectonic theory in geotectonic zoning, seismic activity, and interpretation of modern geodetic survey results was studied. applications. Research shows that: (1) Based on the perspective of open-closed tectonics, the giant open-closed structures in the Asia-Europe-Africa neighborhood can be divided into the Russian tectonic cluster, the African tectonic cluster, the North Asian tectonic cluster, the Central Asian tectonic cluster, the South Asian tectonic cluster and the East Asian tectonic cluster; (2) Strong seismic activity in Asia, Europe and Africa is closely related to the Cenozoic opening and closing tectonic transition zones between tectonic clusters; (3) Seismic profiles and focal mechanisms in the large opening and closing tectonic areas of the Mediterranean reveal the Mediterranean-Turkey-Iran — The current tectonic movement in the Afghan tectonic transition zone is mainly coalescence; (4) The ground tilt and ground strain, peripheral GNSS and flowing gravity observations of Shizishan, Huangmei, Macheng and other stations around the East Dabie medium-sized opening and closing structure reveal that It is found that there is a trend transition from "closing" to "opening" with short time scale and weak magnitude around this area. The opening and closing movement is a common mechanism for the quasi-synchronous changes in the trends of many recent observation data.

KEYWORDS

Geotectonic division; Opening and closing structures; Earthquakes; Crustal deformation observation; Dabie orogenic belt

CITE THIS PAPER

Jordan Wofsy. Geophysical manifestations of opening and closing structures at different spatial and temporal scales. Academic Journal of Earth Sciences. 2024, 2(2): 13-20. DOI: 10.61784/ajesv2n272.

REFERENCES

[1] WYLLIEPJ. Experimental petrology and global tectonics: apreview. Tectonophysics, 1973, 17(3): 189-209.

[2] CONDIEKC. Plate tectonics and crustal evolution.Oxford : Pergamon Press, 1982: 1-310.

[3] Wang Hongzhen. A brief review of global tectonic research. Frontiers of Earth Science, 1995, 2(1): 37-42, 66.

[4] DRACHEV SS. Fold belts and sedimentary basins of the Eurasian Arctic. Arktos, 2016, 2: 21.

[5] ARTEMIEVAI M, THYBO H, KABAN M K. Deep Europe today: geophysical synthesis of the upper mantle structure and lithospheric processes over 3.5 Ga. Geological Society, London, Memoirs, 2006, 32(1) : 11-41.

[6] PEASEV, DRACHEVS, STEPHENSONR. Arctic lithosphere: a review. Tectonophysics, 2014, 628: 1-25.

[7] Ren Jishun, Zhao Lei, Li Chong. Thoughts on geotectonic research in China: the responsibilities and responsibilities of Chinese geologists. Chinese Geology, 2017, 44(1): 33-43.

[8] Yang Weiran, Jiang Chunfa, Zhang Kang. Discussion on the opening and closing tectonic system and its formation mechanism: also on the dynamic mechanism of plate tectonics. Geoscience Frontiers, 2019, 26 (1): 337-355.

[9] Yang Weiran, Jiang Chunfa, Zhang Kang. Opening and closing tectonics: Exploration of the new global tectonic view. Frontiers of Earth Science, 2016, 23(6): 42-60.

[10] Yang Weiran, Jiang Chunfa, Zhang Kang. Discussion on several issues in the new global tectonic view. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2018, 37(1): 1-6.

[11] Yang Weiran, Deng Qinglu. Geoscientific opening and closing laws and their application in the Qinling-Dabie orogenic belt. Hubei Geology, 1994, 8(1): 1-12, 88.

[12] Yang Weiran, Wang Jie, Liang Xiao. Basic characteristics and evolution rules of Asian geotectonic structures. Frontiers of Geosciences, 2012, 19(5): 1-17.

[13] Tian Wen. The development and main structural characteristics of the Archean greenstone belt basement in the Eastern European platform. Foreign Precambrian Geology, 1990, 13(4): 94.

[14] LUBIMOVA EA, MAGNITZKY V A. Thermoelastic stresses and the 能源 of earthquakes. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 1964, 69(16): 3443-3447.

[15] ЗЕлизаръев Ю, ЗабобинВЕ, ЧиковБ М. A brief introduction to the geological structural characteristics and material combinations of the Precambrian in Africa and Arabia. Foreign Precambrian Geology, 1980, 3(2): 57-67.

[16] Сулиди-КондратьевЕЛ, ЗабродинБЕ, Wang Renzhang. Some views on the ring structure of the African-Arabian Craton and the origin of its ore deposits. Foreign Precambrian Geology, 1984, 7(3): 69-74.

[17] Yang Weiran, Sui Zhilong. Extraction of linear structural information from Eurasian continental wind and cloud images and its geological analysis. Frontiers of Geoscience, 2004, 11(4): 551-558.

[18] Yang Weiran, Zeng Zuoxun, Li Dewei. Three-level structural model of intraplate seismic processes. Frontiers of Earth Science, 2009, 16(1): 206-217.

[19] Zhao Xiaoyan, Su Youjin, Fu Hong. Modern tectonic stress field and its zoning characteristics in the Eurasian seismic zone. Earthquake Research, 2007, 30(2): 146-151, 206.

[20] CHIARABBA C, DEGORIP, MELEFM. Recent seismicity of Italy: active tectonics of the Central Mediterranean region and seismicity rate changes after the Mw 6. 3 L'Aquila earthquake. Tectonophysics, 2015, 638: 82-93.

[21] Chen Wei, Mao Jingwen, Xu Zhaowen. Discussion on the two-stage Cretaceous granite diagenesis and molybdenum mineralization in Western Dabie. Earth Science, 2018, 43(12): 4638-4650.

[22] Zhu Jiang, Peng Sanguo, Peng Lianhong. U-Pb geochronology of the bimodal volcanic rocks of the Dingyuan Formation in the western Dabie area of the northern margin of the Yangtze continent and its geological structural significance. Earth Science, 2019, 44(2): 355-365.

[23] Liu Shaofeng, Zhang Guowei. Evolution and dynamics of the basin-mountain system in the East Qinling Mountains-Dabie Mountains and adjacent areas. Geological Bulletin, 2008, 27(12): 1943-1960.

[24] Liu Zhengrong. Earthquake recurrence cycle. Earthquake Research, 1990, 13(2): 117-121.

[25] Chen Peishan, Bai Tongxia, Li Baokun. b value and earthquake recurrence period. Acta Geophysica Sinica, 2003, 46(4): 510-519.

[26] Zhang Peizhen, Xu Xiwei, Wen Xueze. Slip rate, recurrence period and tectonic origin of the seismogenic fault of the 2008 Wenchuan M8.0 earthquake. Acta Geophysica Sinica, 2008, 51(4): 1066-1073.

[27] Li Haibing, Si Jialiang, Pan Jiawei. Deformation characteristics of active faults and estimation of recurrence cycles of large earthquakes. Geological Bulletin, 2008, 27(12): 1968-1991.

[28] Xu Caijun, Dong Lixiang, Li Zhicai. GPS and seismic moment tensor inversion analysis of crustal deformation in North China. Journal of Wuhan University of Science and Technology of Surveying and Mapping, 2000, 25(6): 471-475.

[29] OKUBOS, TANAKA Y, UEKI S. Gravity variation around Shinmoe-dake volcano from February 2011through March2012: results of continuous absolute gravity observation and repeated hybrid gravity measurements. Earth, Planetsand Space, 2013, 65(6) : 563-571.

[30] Zhu Yiqing, Liu Fang, Li Tieming. Dynamic changes in the gravity field in the Sichuan-Yunnan region and its dangerous implications for strong earthquakes. Acta Geophysica Sinica, 2015, 58(11): 4187-4196.

[31] Shen Chongyang, Li Hui, Sun Shaoan. Dynamic changes in the gravity field and the development process of the Wenchuan MS 8.0 earthquake. Acta Geophysica Sinica, 2009, 52(10): 2547-2557.

[32] Zhou Shuoyu, Wu Yun, Jiang Zaisen. Seismic Geodesy. Wuhan: Wuhan University Press, 2017: 52-180.

[33] Tang Lanrong, Lu Jian, Zeng Xinfu. Focal mechanism and stress field characteristics of the Jiujiang-Ruichang earthquake. Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2018, 38(8): 791-795, 827.

[34] Liu Zemin, Huang Xianliang, Ni Hongyu. Study on the seismogenic structure of the Huoshan MS 4.3 earthquake on April 20, 2014. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2015, 37 (3): 402-410.

[35] Xu Jiren, Zhao Zhixin. Regional characteristics of modern crustal stress fields and tectonic movements in the Sulu-Dabie orogen and its surroundings. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2006, 80(12): 1956-1965.

[36] Yang Weiran, Wang Hao. Overview of plate tectonics in China. Earth Science: Journal of China University of Geosciences, 1991, 16(5): 505-513.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. sitemap
Copyright © 2017 - 2024 Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.   All Rights Reserved.