EVOLUTION AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS OF ECOLOGICAL PLANNING STRATEGIES IN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pp 1-2, 2024
DOI: 10.61784/wjafsv2n226
Author(s)
Jack David
Affiliation(s)
Department of Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA.
Corresponding Author
Jack David
ABSTRACT
The purpose of studying the development of ecological planning methods of landscape architecture is mainly to explore the role of landscape architecture in urban development. This article mainly explores the development of ecological planning methods of landscape architecture in different periods, points out the key points of planning methods at different stages, discusses future landscape planning methods, and summarizes the key points of future landscape planning and development, with a view to providing reference for related research.
KEYWORDS
Landscape architecture; Ecological planning; Development history
CITE THIS PAPER
Jack David. Evolution and future directions of ecological planning strategies in landscape architecture. World Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences. 2024, 2(2): 1-2. DOI: 10.61784/wjafsv2n226.
REFERENCES
[1] Peng Qianqian. Development history and trends of ecological planning methods in landscape architecture. Jiangxi Agriculture, 2016 (7): 6.
[2] UN Habitat. Urbanization and development: emerging futures. World Cities Report 2016. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat). HS/038/16E. 2016.
[3] Wu Minghao. A brief analysis of landscape planning methods using landscape ecology theory. Architecture and Culture, 2016 (2): 174-175.
[4] Tress B, Tres G, Fry G, Opdam P (eds). From landscape research to landscape planning: aspects of integration, education and application. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 2006.
[5] Wang Yuncai. Development history and trends of ecological planning methods in landscape architecture. Chinese Garden, 2013 (11): 46-51.
[6] Swaffield S. Empowering landscape ecology-connecting science to governance through design values. Landsc Ecol. 2013, 28:1193–1201.