Author(s)

Polwasit Lhakard

Affiliation(s)

School of Liberal Arts, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi Bangkok, Thailand.

Corresponding Author

Polwasit Lhakard

ABSTRACT

This academic journal article offers a comprehensive review of Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) and its critical role in preparing Generation Z (Gen-Z) employees for the modern workplace. With Gen-Z's increasing presence in the workforce, organizations encounter unique challenges in maximizing their potential and securing their engagement and commitment. Recognized for its positive impact on organizational effectiveness, OCB encompasses voluntary and discretionary behaviors that go beyond formal job descriptions. This paper delves into the theoretical foundations of OCB, explores its various dimensions, and examines its implications for Gen-Z employees in contemporary work environments. Furthermore, it provides evidence-based strategies and interventions that organizations can implement to cultivate OCB among Gen-Z employees, thereby enhancing their performance and job satisfaction. The study concludes with insights into the reliability and validity of these strategies and offers recommendations for future research and organizational practice.

KEYWORDS

Organizational citizenship behavior; Gen-Z; Modern era; Workplace; Employee engagement; Organizational effectiveness

CITE THIS PAPER

Polwasit Lhakard. Organizational citizenship behavior for preparing Gen-Z in the modern era: a comprehensive review. World Journal of Management Science. 2024, 2(2): 64-71. DOI: 10.61784/wmsv2n2109.

REFERENCES

[1] Eisenberger R, Huntington R, Hutchison S, & Sowa D. Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1986, 71(3), 500-507.

[2] Judge TA, & Piccolo RF. Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004, 89(5), 755-768.

[3] Meyer JP, & Allen NJ. A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1991, 1(1), 61-89.

[4] Rhoades L, Eisenberger R, & Armeli S. Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86(5), 825-836.

[5] Chen ZX, & Aryee S. Delegation and employee work outcomes: An examination of the cultural context of mediating processes in China. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(1), 226-238.

[6] Adams JS. Inequity in social exchange. In Advances in experimental social psychology, Academic Press. 1965, 2: 267-299.

[7] Grant AM. Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008, 93(1), 48-58.

[8] Organ DW, Podsakoff PM, & MacKenzie SB. Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Sage Publications, 2006

[9] Demerouti E, Bakker AB, Nachreiner F, & Schaufeli WB. The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86(3), 499-512.

[10] Chiaburu DS, & Harrison DA. Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008, 93(5), 1082-1103.

[11] Judge TA, & Piccolo RF. Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004, 89(5), 755-768.

[12] Albrecht SL, Bakker AB, Gruman JA, Macey WH, & Saks AM. Employee engagement, human resource management practices and competitive advantage: An integrated approach. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 2015, 2(1), 7-35.

[13] Schaufeli WB, & Bakker AB. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2004, 25(3), 293-315.

[14] Hackman JR, & Oldham GR. Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1976, 16(2), 250-279.

[15] Liden RC., Wayne SJ, & Sparrowe RT. An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, 85(3), 407-416.

[16]  Deterding S, Dixon D, Khaled R, & Nacke L. From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification". In Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments, 2011,11, 9-15.

[17] Podsakoff PM, Whiting SW, Podsakoff NP, & Blume BD. Individual-and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009, 94(1), 122.

[18] Schein EH. Organizational culture and leadership. John Wiley & Sons, 2010, 2

[19] Hartnell CA, Ou AY, & Kinicki A. Organizational culture and organizational effectiveness: A meta-analytic investigation of the competing values framework's theoretical suppositions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2011, 96(4), 677.

[20] Bass BM, & Riggio RE. Transformational leadership. Psychology Press, 2006

[21] Wang G, Oh IS, Courtright SH, & Colbert AE. Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of research. Group & Organization Management, 2011, 36(2), 223-270.

[22] Heslin PA, Vandewalle D, & Latham GP. Keen to help? Managers' implicit person theories and their subsequent employee coaching. Personnel Psychology, 2006, 59(4), 871-902.

[23] Whitaker BG., Dahling JJ, & Levy P. The development of a feedback environment and role clarity model of job performance. Journal of Management, 2007, 33(4), 570-591.

[24] Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. Does Gamification Work? -- A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification - IEEE Conference Publication. Ieee.org, 2014, 3025-3034