Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.
Open Access

INDIVIDUAL ENJOYED TEACHING: THE DEMANDS OF TEACHING UNDER THE BACKGROUND OF THE GLOBAL COMMON GOOD

Download as PDF

Volume 2, Issue 4, Pp 118-122, 2024

DOI: 10.61784/tsshr3038

Author(s)

JunJun Wu*XiaoYu Liu

Affiliation(s)

College of Education, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China.

Corresponding Author

JunJun Wu

ABSTRACT

In 2015 UNESCO released a new report, Rethinking Education: Towards a Conceptual Shift towards the 'Global Public Good', which redefines knowledge, learning and education, emphasizes the humanist spirit of education, and suggests that education and knowledge should be defined as a 'common good' that requires the collective efforts of society. The "common good". However, in the existing teaching process, the lack of humanism and the proliferation of instrumental theories are still the curse of teaching, which makes individual enjoyment obscured, and the teaching falls into the situation of "mechanical thinking" and "man-made tools", so that the educational value of the global common good cannot be realized. The value of education for the global common good cannot be realized. Adhering to the spirit of the report, it is not difficult to find that individual enjoyment is the same as the report. Only by paying more attention to the individual enjoyment function of teaching and constructing an evaluation system for individual enjoyment can we break through the fence of "mechanical thinking" and get rid of the "man-made tools". The shackles of "man-made apparatus" will be broken through the fence of "mechanical thinking" and get rid of the shackles of "man-made apparatus", and it will also become a practical way to promote the common value of education for human beings.

KEYWORDS

Individual enjoyed teaching; The global common good; Pedagogical claims

CITE THIS PAPER

JunJun Wu, XiaoYu Liu. Individual enjoyed teaching: the demands of teaching under the background of the global common good. Trends in Social Sciences and Humanities Research. 2024, 2(4): 118-122. DOI: 10.61784/tsshr3038.

REFERENCES

[1] Thomas Berry. The Great Work: Our Way into the Future. Life - Reading - Xinzhi Sanlian Bookstore, 2005: 96.

[2] Robert S. Brumbaugh. Whitehead's process philosophy of education. New York: State University of New York Press, 1982: 124.

[3] John Dewey.Democracy and Education. Translated by Wang Chengxu.Beijiing:People’s Education Press, 2019: 50-211.

[4] Feng Jianjun. The individual enjoyment function of education. Shanghai Education Research, 2002, (01): 28.

[5] Li Zhaocun, Curriculum knowledge theory. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press, 2009: 7.

[6] L. Wang. Process Philosophy and the Way of University. The future of higher education: proceedings of the international symposium on process thinking and higher education reform. Changchun: Jilin People's Publishing House, 2007: 152.

[7] Wang Shuai. Poetic Knowledge and the Poetic Construction of Knowledge Teaching. Global Education Perspectives, 2010, (03): 21-22.

[8] Li Zhaocun. Epistemological foundations of reflective knowledge teaching. Global Education Perspectives, 2006, (11): 21.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. sitemap
Copyright © 2017 - 2024 Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.   All Rights Reserved.