Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.
Open Access

DOES GLOBAL VALUE CHAIN EMBEDDEDNESS PROMOTE THE NATIONAL INNOVATION CAPABILITY? ——EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS BASED ON PANEL DATA OF 62 COUNTRIES

Download as PDF

Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 1-14

Author(s)

Zuchang ZHONG1*, Qianyi ZOU2, Mengyuan ZHANG3, Pang Yuning4, Qiuyu HUANG4

Affiliation(s)

1. Guangdong Institute of International Strategy, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou 510420, China;

2. School of Economics and Trade, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou 510006, China;

3. School of Accounting, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou 510006, China;

4. School of Business, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou 510006, China.

Corresponding Author

Zuchang ZHONG, email: zhongzuc@163.com

ABSTRACT

Embedding global value chain (GVC) is an important means for a country to consolidate and enhance its industrial competitive advantage and innovation capability. Based on the panel data of 62 countries from 2010 to 2015, this paper empirically tests the influence of global value chain embeddedness on national innovation capability, and divides the sample into developed and developing countries according to the standard of national development level, to test the national heterogeneity of the influence of GVC embeddedness on innovation capability. The study finds that: (1) A country's forward participation can inhibit its innovation capability, while backward participation can promote its innovation capability. The effects of different participation show that embedding GVC can promote a country's innovation capability. (2) The influence of forward participation, backward participation and total participation of GVC on innovation capability presents an inverted U-shaped relationship. Over embeddedness will lead to the risks of "capture effect" and " Low-end Locking Dilemma". (3) Embedded in global value chains has national heterogeneity. Developed countries promote innovation capability through GVC forward participation, while developing countries promote innovation capability through GVC backward participation.

KEYWORDS

Global value chain; national innovation capacity; forward participation; backward participation; over embeddedness.

CITE THIS PAPER

Zuchang ZHONG, Qianyi ZOU, Mengyuan ZHANG, Pang Yuning, Qiuyu HUANG. Does global value chain embeddedness promote the national innovation capability? —— empirical analysis based on panel data of 62 countries. Eurasia Journal of Science and Technology. 2023, 5(1): 1-14.

REFERENCES

[1] Amiti, M., Itskhoki, O., & Konings, J. (2014). Importers, exporters, and exchange rate disconnect. American Economic Review, 104(7), 1942-1978. 

[2] Bao-lin, W., & Ming-shen, Z. (2015). Marketization, collaboration with academics and innovation performanc enterprises. Studies in Science of Science(5), 748-757. 

[3] Bin, L., Qian, W., Yue, L., & Kunfub, Z. (2016). Servitization of Manufacturing and Value Chain Upgrading. Economic Research Journal, 51(3), 151-162. 

[4] Bloom, N., Draca, M., & Van Reenen, J. (2016). Trade induced technical change? The impact of Chinese imports on innovation, IT and productivity. The review of economic studies, 83(1), 87-117. 

[5] Ge, J., Fu, Y., Xie, R., Liu, Y., & Mo, W. (2018). The effect of GVC embeddedness on productivity improvement: From the perspective of R\&D and government subsidy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 22-31. 

[6] Gereffi, G. (2001). Beyond the producer-driven/buyer-driven dichotomy the evolution of global value chains in the internet era. IDS bulletin, 32(3), 30-40. 

[7] Guschanski, A., & Onaran, O. Z. (2021). The effect of global value chain participation on the labour share-Industry level evidence from emerging economies. 

[8] Huixin, Y., & Hongxia, Z. (2020). Global Value Chain Embedding and Technological Innovation:Based on Production Decomposition Model. Statistical Research, 37(10), 66-78 %\ 2022-2012-2020 2016:2027:2000. 

[9] Hummels, D., Ishii, J., & Yi, K.-M. (2001). The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade. Journal of international Economics, 54(1), 75-96. 

[10] Humphrey, J., & Schmitz, H. (2002). How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters? Regional studies, 36(9), 1017-1027.

[11] Kaplinsky, R., & Morris, M. (2000). A handbook for value chain research (Vol. 113). University of Sussex, Institute of Development Studies Brighton. 

[12] Koopman, R., Powers, W., Wang, Z., & Wei, S.-J. (2010). Give credit where credit is due: Tracing value added in global production chains

[13] Liu, J., Lu, K., & Cheng, S. (2018). International R\&D spillovers and innovation efficiency. Sustainability, 10(11), 3974. 

[14] Mahy, B. I. T., Rycx, F. C. C. O., Vermeylen, G., & Volral, M. E. L. (2019). Productivity, Wages and Profits: Does Firms' Position in the Value Chain Matter? Available at SSRN 3495772

[15] Qing-jun, Z., Chun, W., & Qing-yun, Z. (2019). Research on the Spatial Effect of Producer Services Agglomeration an Regional Innovation Efficiency. Soft Science, 33(1), 24-28 %\ 2022-2012-2020 2016:2037:2000. 

[16] Ryan, P., Buciuni, G., Giblin, M., & Andersson, U. (2020). Subsidiary upgrading and global value chain governance in the multinational enterprise. Global Strategy Journal, 10(3), 496-519. 

[17] Schmitz, H. (2004a). Local enterprises in the global economy. Edward Elgar Publishing. 

[18] Schmitz, H. (2004b). Local upgrading in global chains: recent findings. Institute of Development Studies. Sussex, 6, 2-7. 

[19] Serpa, J. C., & Krishnan, H. (2018). The impact of supply chains on firm-level productivity. Management Science, 64(2), 511-532. 

[20] Tajoli, L., & Felice, G. (2018). Global value chains participation and knowledge spillovers in developed and developing countries: An empirical investigation. The European Journal of Development Research, 30(3), 505-532. 

[21] Wenqun, L., Chonghuai, N., & Chunyan, Y. (2016). Research on Innovation Effect of Human Capital Based on Heteroscedas Stochastic Frontier Model. 33(15), 145-150. 

[22] Wu, L., Chen, G., & Peng, S. (2021). Human Capital Expansion and Global Value Chain Upgrading: Firm-level Evidence from China. China \& World Economy, 29(5), 28-56. 

[23] Xiaosong, W., Yue, L., & Chunming, Z. (2017). Trade barriers and global value chain embeddedness - a case study of anti-dumping in China. Social Sciences in China(1), 108-124. 

[24] Xinshu, G., Mengjie, L., & Hongzhen, Z. (2017). Has OFDI Promoted the Industrial Enterprises' Green Innovation Efficiency in China——Evidence based on Agglomeration Economic Effect. Journal of International Trade(11), 127-137. 

[25] Xue-min, S., & Jie, W. (2016). The Effect of Global Value Chain Embeddedness on Total Factor Productivity: an Empirical Analysis Based on Chinese Company-Level Mic Data. Journal of International Trade(3), 3-14. 

[26] Yue, L. (2018). Does Embedding the Global Value Chain Lead to Chinese Manufacture “Low-end Locking”. Management World, 8, 11-29. 

[27] Zhou, W. C., Yan, D., & Sun, S. L. (2022). Climbing the Ladder: Inward Sourcing as an Upgrading Capability in Global Value Chains. Research Policy, 51(3), 104439.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. sitemap
Copyright © 2017 - 2024 Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.   All Rights Reserved.