Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.
Open Access

DOES ECONOMIC POLICY UNCERTAINTY AFFECT CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY INVESTMENT? EVIDENCE FROM LISTED COMPANIES IN CHINA

Download as PDF

Volume 1, Issue 1, Pp 39-42, 2024

DOI: 10.61784/jtfe3008

Author(s)

YaPing Wu

Affiliation(s)

Zhujiang College, South China Agricultural University,Guangzhou 510900, Guangdong, China.

Corresponding Author

YaPing Wu

ABSTRACT

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has become a crucial part of modern business strategies. This paper aims to explore the impact of economic policy uncertainty on corporate CSR activities, and further analyze the role of factors such as firm size, financial leverage, profitability, and growth opportunities in CSR disclosure. Using data from A-share listed companies in China, a multiple regression model was employed for empirical analysis. The results show that economic policy uncertainty has a significant negative impact on CSR activities, indicating that uncertainty in the policy environment reduces firms’ CSR investments. Firm size and profitability positively influence CSR activities, suggesting that larger companies and more profitable firms are more likely to engage in CSR. Financial leverage and growth opportunities do not have a significant impact on CSR, reflecting that financial conditions and market opportunities influence CSR decisions less than expected. The inclusion of industry and year fixed effects effectively controls for systemic differences across industries and over time, making the model results more robust. These findings provide valuable insights for firms in formulating CSR strategies and offer theoretical support for policymakers to improve policy environments that encourage corporate social responsibility.

KEYWORDS

Corporate social responsibility (CSR); Economic policy uncertainty; Corporate decision-making; Socio-economic context of china

CITE THIS PAPER

YaPing Wu. Does economic policy uncertainty affect corporate social responsibility investment? evidence from listed companies in China. Journal of Trends in Financial and Economics. 2024, 1(1): 39-42. DOI: 10.61784/jtfe3008.

REFERENCES

[1] Yusif S, Hafeez-Baig A. Impact of stakeholder engagement strategies on managerial cognitive decision-making: The context of CSP and CSR. Social Responsibility Journal, 2024, 20(6), 1101-1121

[2] Reavis M, Singh K, Tucci J. Millennials' strategic decision making through the lens of corporate social responsibility and financial management. Journal of Business Strategies, 2021, 38(2), 125.

[3] Fatima T, Elbanna S. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) implementation: A review and a research agenda towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 2023, 183(1), 105-121.

[4] El Haddad P, Bachkirov A A, Grishina O. Comparative CSR decision-making in the Middle East: An exploratory study. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 2021, 14(4), 792-811.

[5] Velte P. Meta-analyses on corporate social responsibility (CSR): A literature review. Management Review Quarterly, 2022, 72(3), 627-675.

[6] Wickert C. Corporate social responsibility research in the Journal of Management Studies: A shift from a business‐centric to a society‐centric focus. Journal of Management Studies, 2021, 58(8), E1-E17.

[7] Nqumba B M A, Scheepers C B. Authentic leadership’s influence on strategic corporate social responsibility in South Africa: Mediated by participative decision-making. European Business Review, 2023, 35(2), 161-183.

[8] Ahmad M, Wu Q, Khattak, M S. Intellectual capital, corporate social responsibility and sustainable competitive performance of small and medium-sized enterprises: Mediating effects of organizational innovation. Kybernetes, 2023, 52(10), 4014-4040.

[9] Le T T. Corporate social responsibility and SMEs' performance: Mediating role of corporate image, corporate reputation and customer loyalty. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 2023, 18(10), 4565-4590.

[10] Ullah Z, Arslan A, Puhakka V. Corporate social responsibility strategy, sustainable product attributes, and export performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2021, 28(6), 1840-1853.

[11] Liu A Z, Liu A X, Moon S, Siegel D. Does corporate social responsibility always result in more ethical decision-making? Evidence from product recall remediation. Journal of Business Ethics, 2024, 191(3), 443-463.

[12] Ghobakhloo M, Asadi S, Iranmanesh M, Foroughi B, Mubarak M F, Yadegaridehkordi E. Intelligent automation implementation and corporate sustainability performance: The enabling role of corporate social responsibility strategy. Technology in Society, 2023, 74, 102301.

[13] Xue C, Shahbaz M, Ahmed Z, Ahmad M, Sinha A. Clean energy consumption, economic growth, and environmental sustainability: What is the role of economic policy uncertainty?. Renewable Energy, 2022, 184, 899-907.

[14] Phan D H B, Iyke B N, Sharma S S, Affandi Y. Economic policy uncertainty and financial stability—Is there a relation?. Economic Modelling, 2021, 94, 1018-1029.

[15] Baker E, Fowlie M, Lemoine D, Reynolds S S. The economics of solar electricity. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 2013, 5(1), 387-426.

[16] Chourou L, Purda L, Saadi S. Economic policy uncertainty and analysts’ forecast characteristics. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 2021, 40(4), 106775.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. sitemap
Copyright © 2017 - 2024 Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.   All Rights Reserved.