THE INTERSECTION OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION RESEARCH: PERSPECTIVES ON GOVERNANCE NETWORKS AND SOCIAL EQUITY
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pp 57-63, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/ssm3010
Author(s)
XianChan Wang
Affiliation(s)
Student Affairs Department, Baise University, Baise 533000, Guangxi, China.
Corresponding Author
XianChan Wang
ABSTRACT
This study aims to explore the intersection between public administration and nonprofit organization research, particularly from the perspective of governance networks and social equity. By analyzing their synergy and interaction in terms of theory, research themes, and methodology, the study employs systems theory, network theory, organizational theory, management theory, sociology theory, and economics theory. It utilizes qualitative, quantitative, and mixed research methods through literature reviews and theoretical analyses to reveal the significance of social equity, governance networks, organizational change, and public participation in the study of public administration and nonprofit organizations. The results indicate that the collaborative relationship between public administration and nonprofit organizations in social services, policy-making, and resource allocation is crucial for advancing social equity and justice. The conclusion asserts that interdisciplinary research and collaboration not only enhance governance efficiency but also provide important theoretical and practical guidance for future public services and social development.
KEYWORDS
Public administration; Nonprofit organizations; Governance networks; Social equity; Interdisciplinary research; Organizational change; Public participation
CITE THIS PAPER
XianChan Wang. The intersection of public administration and nonprofit organization research: perspectives on governance networks and social equity. Social Science and Management. 2024, 1(1): 57-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/ssm3010.
REFERENCES
[1] Bodin O, Mancilla García M, Robins G. Reconciling conflict and cooperation in environmental governance: a social network perspective. Annu Rev Environ Resour, 2020, 45(1): 471-495.
[2] Wang H, Ran B. Network governance and collaborative governance: a thematic analysis on their similarities, differences, and entanglements. Public Manag Rev, 2021, 25(6): 1187-1211.
[3] Farazmand A, editor. Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance. Springer Nature; 2023.
[4] Bryhinets OO, Svoboda I, Shevchuk OR, et al. Public value management and new public governance as modern approaches to the development of public administration. Revista San Gregorio, 2020, 1(42): 205-214.
[5] Roy S, Bahuguna PC, Rawat N. Performance management in public sector organizations: A bibliometric analysis. Int J Organ Leadership, 2023, 12(Special Issue): 115-141.
[6] Qian W, Liu H, Pan F. Digital economy, industry heterogeneity, and service industry resource allocation. Sustainability, 2022, 14(13): 8020.
[7] Soelton M, Noermijati N, Rohman F, et al. Improving the performance of nonprofit organizations? Acad Strateg Manag J, 2021, 20: 1-13.
[8] Raksnys AV, Valickas A, Vanagas R. Challenges of creation and implementation of collaborative innovations in public sector organisations. Public Policy Adm, 2020, 19(1): 9-21.
[9] Trein P, Biesbroek R, Bolognesi T, et al. Policy coordination and integration: A research agenda. Public Adm Rev, 2021, 81(5): 973-977.
[10] Vu TA, Plimmer G, Berman E, et al. Performance management in the Vietnam public sector: The role of institution, traditional culture and leadership. Int J Public Adm, 2022, 45(1): 49-63.
[11] Nkrumah Agyabeng A, Preko A. A stakeholder analysis of government policy intervention in the Ghanaian slum communities. Hous Care Support, 2021, 24(2): 41-53.
[12] Kuhlmann J. Mechanisms of policy transfer and policy diffusion. In: Handbook of policy transfer, diffusion and circulation. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021, 43-57.
[13] Yang MX, Niu SR. Chromosome karyotyping by G-banding in peripheral blood lymphocyte cultures of 5309 couples with adverse reproductive history. J Youjiang Med Coll Nationalities, 2019, (5): 520-522.
[14] Huang N, Liu YP, Xu ZF, et al. Study on the relationship between syndrome differentiation types, tongue features, and gastroscope results in active peptic ulcer. J Youjiang Med Coll Nationalities, 2018, (5): 466-468, 471.
[15] Rao ZF, Chen JY, Zhao LY, et al. Comparison of ultrasound-guided microwave ablation and laparoscopic resection for benign thyroid nodules. J Youjiang Med Coll Nationalities, 2018, (6): 583-585.