Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.
Open Access

CHAR LAND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES VALUATION AND LIVELIHOOD IN NORTHERN REGIONS OF BANGLADESH

Download as PDF

Volume 2, Issue 2, Pp 42-51, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/ajes3003

Author(s)

M. A. Khatun*, M. A. Baten, M. S. Islam

Affiliation(s)

Department of Environmental Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Palli Daridro Bimochon Foundation, Bangladesh.

Corresponding Author

M. A. Khatun

ABSTRACT

Char is newly emerged land in river channel. The research may give some illustrative indications for policy-maker on behalf of proper application of the charred area. It helps to identify the Ecosystem Services (ES) that are present in char land, the dependence of char dwellers living on the ES, and the probable value of using provisioning services. It carried out the study based on a Questionnaire survey, Focus Group Discussion, and Key Informant Interviews among the char dwellers. We identified 30 ecosystem services, where most of the provisioning ecosystem services present status are increased production, but due to low marketing facility, training, and social structure, some indigenous species are lost. The maximum of housekeepers living in the study area depended on farming/crop husbandry (major work) and dependence on provisioning ecosystem services. The total value is 2916478776.1 BDT, which is 0.05% of the total budget in the 2020-21 financial year of the people’s republic of Bangladesh. Policymakers must plan and implement effective strategies and programs to minimize vulnerability and enhance the local adaptation processes to improve such households’ livelihood across Bangladesh. The objective is to develop a comprehensive integrated plan and policies for char land development and livelihood sustainability.

KEYWORDS

Char land; Ecosystem services; Valuation; Livelihood; Bangladesh

CITE THIS PAPER

M. A. Khatun, M. A. Baten, M. S. Islam. Char land ecosystem services valuation and livelihood in northern regions of Bangladesh. Academic Journal of Earth Sciences. 2024, 2(2): 42-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/ajes3003.

REFERENCES

[1] Tansley, AG. The use and abuse of vegetational terms and concepts. Ecology, 1935, 16(3): 284-307. DOI:10.2307/1930070. JSTOR 1930070.

[2] Molles MC. Ecology: Concepts and Applications. Boston: WCB/McGraw-Hill 482. 1999.

[3] Chapin, FS, Matson, PA, Mooney, HA. Carbon input to terrestrial ecosystems. Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology, 2002, 97-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21663-4_5.

[4] Schulze, ED, Erwin, B, Klaus, MH. Plant Ecology. Berlin, Springer. 2005.

[5] Gurevitch, J, Scheiner, GM, Fox, GA. The Ecology of Plants (Second ed.). Sunderland, Massachusetts. Sinauer Associates. Annals of Botany, 2006, 99, 371-374.

[6] Smith, TM, Smith, RL. Elements of Ecology (Eighth ed.). Boston, Benjamin Cummings. 2012, 5.

[7] Costanza, R, d'Arge, R, De Groot, R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. nature, 1997, 387(6630): 253-260.

[8] De Groot, RS, Wilson, MA, Boumans, RM. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological economics, 2002, 41(3): 393-408.

[9] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Wetlands and Water Synthesis.  World Resources Institute, Washington, DC. 2005.

[10] The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. Mainstreaming the economics of nature. A synthesis of the approach, conclusions, and recommendations of TEEB synthesis. 2010.

[11] Finlayson, M, Cruz, RD, Davidson, N, et al. (2005). Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being: wetlands and water synthesis. 2005.

[12] Wang, Y, Bakker, F, Groot, DRS, et al. (2014). Effect of ecosystem services provided by urban green infrastructure on indoor environment. Building and Environment, 2014, 77, 88-100. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.03.021.

[13] Lette, H, De Boo, H. Economic valuation of forests and nature: a support tool for effective decision making (No. 6). International Agricultural Centre. 2002, 6.

[14] Fekadu, A, Soromessa, T, Warkineh Dullo, B. Role of forest provisioning services to local livelihoods: based on relative forest income (RFI) approach in southwest Ethiopia coffee forest. Environmental Systems Research, 2021, 10(1): 1-15.

[15] Shedayi, AA, Xu, M, Gonalez-Redin, J, et al. Spatiotemporal assessment and valuation of provisioning ecosystem services of Pakistan. Appl Ecol Environ Res, 2019, 17(3): 6735-6759.

[16] Costanza, R, Daly, H, Folke, C, et al. Managing our environmental portfolio. BioScience, 2000, 50(2): 149-155.

[17] Kahneman, D. Thinking, Fast and Slow; Farrar, Straus and Giroux: New York, NY, USA, 2011. 

[18] Tallis, H, Kareiva, P, Marvier, M, et al. An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008, 105(28): 9457-9464.

[19] Sjostedt, M. Ecosystem services and poverty reduction: how do development practitioners conceptualize the linkages? The European Journal of Development Research, 2012, 24(5): 777-787.

[20] Shackleton, SE, Shackleton, CM. Linking poverty, HIV/AIDS and climate change to human and ecosystem vulnerability in southern Africa: consequences for livelihoods and sustainable ecosystem management. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 2012, 19(3): 275-286.

[21] Ninan, KN, Inoue, M. Valuing forest ecosystem services: What we know and what we don’t. Valuing Ecosystem Services, 2014, 93, 137-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.05.005.

[22] Lange, GM, Jiddawi, N. Economic value of marine ecosystem services in Zanzibar: Implications for marine conservation and sustainable development. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2009, 52(10): 521-532.

[23] De Groot R, Brander L, van der Ploeg S, et al. Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services, 2012,  1(1): 50-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005.

[24] Fisher, JA, Patenaude, G, Giri, K, et al. Understanding the relationships between ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: A conceptual framework. Ecosystem services, 2014, 7, 34-45.

[25] Lawrence, RJ. Human ecology and its applications. Landscape and urban planning, 2003, 65(1-2): 31-40.

[26] FAO. The State of Food Insecurity in the World (2009). Rome

[27] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Climate Change. Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability: Contribution of the working group II to the fourth assessment report of the (IPCC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2007.

[28] Rahman, MM, Islam, MA. Better options for IFM: uptake promotion NRSP project R8306 final technical report: annex a. Center for Natural Resource Studies (CNRS), Dhaka. 2005.

[29] Costanza, R, Pérez-Maqueo, O, Martinez, ML, et al. The value of coastal wetlands for hurricane protection. Ambio, 2008, 37(4): 241-248.

[30] Khatun, MA, Baten, MA, Farukh, MA, et al. The impact of climate change on ecosystem services and socio-economic conditions of Char Dwellers in Northern Regions of Bangladesh. Journal of Governance and Accountability Studies, 2022, 2(1): 29-48.

[31] Liss, KN, Mitchell, MG, MacDonald, GK, et al. Variability in ecosystem service measurement: a pollination service case study. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2013, 11(8): 414-422.

[32] Daw, TM, Coulthard, S, Cheung, WW, et al. Evaluating taboo trade-offs in ecosystems services and human well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2015, 112(22): 6949-6954.

[33] Perrings, C, Naeem, S, Ahrestani, FS, et al. Ecosystem services, targets, and indicators for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2011, 9(9): 512-520.

[34] Roy D, Sarker DD, Sheheli S. Food Security in Bangladesh: Insight from Available Literature. Journal of Nutrition and Food Security, 2019,  4(1). DOI:10.18502/jnfs.v4i1.401.

[35] Pocock, MJ, Evans, DM, Fontaine, C, et al. (2016). The visualisation of ecological networks, and their use as a tool for engagement, advocacy and management. In Advances in ecological research, 2016, 54, 41-85. DOI:10.1016/bs.aecr.2015.10.006.

[36] Sutherland, WJ, Aveling, R, Brooks, TM, et al. A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2014. Trends in ecology & evolution, 2014, 29(1): 15-22.

[37] Khatun, MA, Baten, MA, Farukh, MA. Climate Change Induced Major Livelihood Changes on Char Dwellers in Northern Regions of Bangladesh. SAARC Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 19(2): 317-330.

[38] Chaudhary, S, Chettri, N, Uddin, K, et al. Implications of land cover change on ecosystems services and people’s dependency: A case study from the Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal. Ecological Complexity, 2016, 28, 200-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2016.04.002.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. sitemap
Copyright © 2017 - 2024 Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.   All Rights Reserved.