OPTIMIZING LEGAL RECOMMENDATION SYSTEMS WITH HYBRID DEEP LEARNING APPROACHES
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pp 11-20, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wjsl3007
Author(s)
Viet Hung Nguyen1, Reeva Valentine2*
Affiliation(s)
1School of Computer Science and Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
2School of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Corresponding Author
Reeva Valentine
ABSTRACT
This paper explores the optimization of legal recommendation systems through the application of hybrid deep learning approaches. As the volume of legal information continues to grow, traditional methods of legal research have become inadequate, necessitating the integration of advanced technologies to improve efficiency and accuracy in document retrieval. The proposed hybrid framework combines Convolutional Neural Networks, Recurrent Neural Networks , and Transformers to enhance the personalization and relevance of recommendations for legal professionals. The findings indicate that this hybrid model significantly outperforms traditional keyword-based systems by providing context-aware and nuanced recommendations, ultimately aiding legal practitioners in navigating vast repositories of legal documents more effectively. The implications for legal practice are profound, as the framework can automate document analysis, allowing professionals to focus on strategic tasks. Future research directions include expanding the diversity of training data, enhancing user feedback mechanisms, and exploring the explainability of AI-driven recommendations in legal contexts.
KEYWORDS
Legal recommendation systems; Hybrid deep learning; Document analysis
CITE THIS PAPER
Viet Hung Nguyen, Reeva Valentine. Optimizing legal recommendation systems with hybrid deep learning approaches. World Journal of Sociology and Law. 2024, 2(3): 11-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wjsl3007.
REFERENCES
[1] Choi J H, Schwarcz D. (2023). Ai assistance in legal analysis: An empirical study. Social Science Research Network, 2023.
[2] Prakken H. AI & Law, logic and argument schemes. Argumentation, 2005, 19: 303-320.
[3] Said G, Azamat K, Ravshan S, et al. Adapting legal systems to the development of artificial intelligence: solving the global problem of AI in judicial processes. International Journal of Cyber Law, 2023, 1(4).
[4] Cheng Y, Wang S. Convolutional Neural Networks for Text Classification in Legal Documents. Journal of Information Science, 2022, 48(1): 89-101.
[5] Zhao J, Li H. User Experience in Legal Recommendation Systems: A Comprehensive Study. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2020, 35(4): 367-386.
[6] Dai Z, Liu J. Enhancing Legal Recommendation Systems with User Feedback. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2020, 68: 345-367.
[7] Igbinenikaro E, Adewusi A O. Navigating the legal complexities of artificial intelligence in global trade agreements. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 2024, 6(4): 488-505.
[8] Chamberlain J. The risk-based approach of the European Union’s proposed artificial intelligence regulation: Some comments from a tort law perspective. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2023, 14(1): 1-13.
[9] El-Bakry H, Al-Azab M. A Comparative Study of Neural Collaborative Filtering Techniques for Legal Document Recommendation. Journal of Data Science, 2021, 19(1): 55-72.
[10] Wang X, Zhang X, Hoo V, et al. LegalReasoner: A Multi-Stage Framework for Legal Judgment Prediction via Large Language Models and Knowledge Integration. IEEE Access, 2024.
[11] Deldjoo Y, Jannach D, Bellogin A, et al. Fairness in recommender systems: research landscape and future directions. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 2024, 34(1): 59-108.
[12] Li J, Fan L, Wang X, et al. Product Demand Prediction with Spatial Graph Neural Networks. Applied Sciences, 2024, 14(16): 6989.
[13] Yang L, Sun Z. Hybrid Approaches in Legal Recommendation Systems: A Review and Future Directions. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2021, 22: 1-20.
[14] Stray J, Halevy A, Assar P, et al. Building human values into recommender systems: An interdisciplinary synthesis. ACM Transactions on Recommender Systems, 2024, 2(3): 1-57.
[15] Sun T, Yang J, Li J, et al. Enhancing Auto Insurance Risk Evaluation with Transformer and SHAP. IEEE Access, 2024.
[16] Sharma D, Singh Aujla G, Bajaj R. Evolution from ancient medication to human‐centered Healthcare 4.0: A review on health care recommender systems. International Journal of Communication Systems, 2023, 36(12): e4058.
[17] Fan W, Zhang Z. The Impact of Deep Learning on Legal Document Retrieval. Journal of Legal Studies, 2020, 49(4): 789-805.
[18] Zhang C, Wang J. The Role of AI in Transforming Legal Practices: A Review. Journal of Legal Studies, 2021, 50(3): 201-218.
[19] Bhatia M, Gupta R. Hybrid Recommendation Systems: A Comprehensive Survey. International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing, 2021, 11(4): 215-230.
[20] Etemadi M, Abkenar S B, Ahmadzadeh A, et al. A systematic review of healthcare recommender systems: Open issues, challenges, and techniques. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, 213: 118823.
[21] Gao Y, Li X. Natural Language Processing in Legal Contexts: Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of Legal Informatics, 2021, 15(2): 99-115.
[22] Valentine L, D’Alfonso S, Lederman R. Recommender systems for mental health apps: advantages and ethical challenges. AI & society, 2023, 38(4): 1627-1638.
[23] Ren J, Zhang Y. Explainable AI in Legal Recommendation Systems: A Framework for Transparency. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2022, 70: 1-30.
[24] Nguyen Thanh T, Quach N D K, Nguyen T T, et al. Poisoning GNN-based recommender systems with generative surrogate-based attacks. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 2023, 41(3): 1-24.
[25] Wang X, Hoo V, Liu M, et al. Advancing legal recommendation system with enhanced Bayesian network machine learning. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2024: 1-18.
[26] Meng Q, Zhang L. Understanding User Preferences in Legal Recommendation Systems: A Data-Driven Approach. Journal of Legal Technology, 2020, 12(1), 23-40.
[27] Rissland E L, Ashley K D, Loui R P. AI and Law: A fruitful synergy. Artificial Intelligence, 2023, 150(1-2): 1-15.
[28] Wang X, Wu Y C. Empowering legal justice with AI: A reinforcement learning SAC-VAE framework for advanced legal text summarization. PloS one, 2024, 19(10): e0312623.
[29] Kim S, Park J. User-Centric Design in Legal Technology: Enhancing User Experience in Recommendation Systems. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2020, 36(4): 367-386.
[30] Surden H. Artificial intelligence and law: An overview. Georgia State University Law Review, 2019, 35(4).
[31] Tang J, Zhang H. Exploring the Use of AI in Legal Document Retrieval: A Review. AI & Law, 2022, 28(2): 145-162.
[32] Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T, Bollegala D. Explanation in AI and law: Past, present and future. Artificial Intelligence, 2020, 289: 103387.
[33] Ahn J, Lee H. Deep Learning for Legal Document Analysis: A Review. Journal of Legal Technology, 2020, 12(3): 45-67.
[34] Liu Y, Chen G. Sentiment Analysis of Legal Opinions Using Deep Learning Techniques. Journal of Legal Studies, 2020, 48(1): 67-85.
[35] Wang H, Chen J. Improving Legal Recommendation Systems through Hybrid Deep Learning Approaches. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2020, 68: 345-367.
[36] Chen J, Cui Y, Zhang X, et al. Temporal Convolutional Network for Carbon Tax Projection: A Data-Driven Approach. Applied Sciences, 2024, 14(20): 9213.
[37] Wei Z, Sun T, Zhou M. LIRL: Latent Imagination-Based Reinforcement Learning for Efficient Coverage Path Planning. Symmetry, 2024, 16(11): 1537.
[38] Lu K, Zhang X, Zhai T, et al. Adaptive Sharding for UAV Networks: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach to Blockchain Optimization. Sensors, 2024, 24(22): 7279.