Author(s)

Qi Wang

Affiliation(s)

School of Politics and Public Administration, Neijiang Normal University, Neijiang 641000, Sichuan, China.

Corresponding Author

Qi Wang

ABSTRACT

Focusing on urban areas of contemporary China, this paper interrogates the interactions between the pension and retirement policy and the pathways of middle-aged citizens to retirement. At present, the pension regime in China is in the transition process, and the future direction of the pension reform is yet to be decided. The existing research mainly focuses on the pension systems and pension reforms in China from a macro-level and financial perspective. However, the experiences, expectations, and perspectives of the individuals are largely ignored. Notably, the application of qualitative research methods is relatively deficient in China. As a Grounded Theory study, this research project applies semi-structured interviews to fill in this gap. Thirty-six interviews were conducted. Through researching the opinions on the pension reform and experiences of the transitions from employment to retirement, this research identifies a gap between the choices made by the individuals and the current pension regime. The retirement pathways are increasingly individualised in urban China at present, which is in tandem with the characteristics of a postmodern society. However, the choices of older workers on work/retirement are still influenced by structural factors, such as the pension and retirement policy.

KEYWORDS

Retirement; Pension; Postmodern; China

CITE THIS PAPER

Qi Wang. Individualised retirement pathways and pension reform in postmodern urban China: a grounded theory study. Social Science and Management. 2024, 1(2): 52-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/ssm3020.

REFERENCES

[1] Zhang X. Enterprise pensions in China: history and challenges. Public Finance and Management, 2009, 9(1): 76-96.

[2] West L. Pension reform in China: preparing for the future. Journal of Development Studies, 1999, 35(3): 153-183. DOI: 10.1080/00220389908422578.

[3] Salditt F, Whiteford P, Adema W. Pension reform in China. International Social Security Review, 2008, 61(3): 47–71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-246X.2008.00316.x.

[4] Liu T, Sun L. Pension reform in China. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 2016, 28(1): 15–28. DOI: 10.1080/08959420.2016.1111724.

[5] Hu A. The global spread of neoliberalism and China’s pension reform since 1978. Journal of World History, 2012, 23(3): 609-638. DOI: 10.1353/jwh.2012.0075.

[6] Esping-Andersen G. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. London: Polity, 1990.

[7] Bambra C. Going beyond the three worlds of welfare capitalism: regime theory and public health research. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 2007, 61(12): 1098-1102. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2007.064915.

[8] Jones C. The Pacific challenge: Confucian welfare states. In: Jones C, ed. New Perspectives on the Welfare State in Europe. London: Routledge, 1993: 198–217.

[9] Abrahamson P. East Asian welfare regime: obsolete ideal-type or diversified reality. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 2017, 10(1): 90-103.

[10] Lin K, Rantalaiho M. Family policy and social order: comparing the dynamics of family policy-making in Scandinavia and Confucian Asia. International Journal of Social Welfare, 2003, 12(1): 2–13. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2397.00241.

[11] Zhu H, Walker A. The gap in social care provision for older people in China. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 2017, 12(1): 17–28. DOI: 10.1111/aswp.12139.

[12] Fan C. China's Eleventh Five-Year Plan (2006-2010): From "Getting Rich First" to "Common Prosperity". Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2006, 47(6): 708-723. DOI: 10.2747/1538-7216.47.6.708.

[13] Sung S. Women reconciling paid and unpaid work in a Confucian welfare state: the case of South Korea. Social Policy and Administration, 2003, 37(4): 342-360.

[14] Kim H. A caring welfare state in South Korea: challenges and prospects. International Journal of Care and Caring, 2018, 2(3): 333-348. DOI: 10.1332/239788218X15321005704571.

[15] Holiday I. Productivist Welfare Capitalism: Social Policy in East Asia. Political Studies, 2000, 48(4): 706-723. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.00279.

[16] Kwon H. An overview of study, the developmental welfare state and policy reforms in East Asia. In: Kwon H, ed. Transforming the Developmental Welfare State in East Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005: 1–23. DOI: 10.1057/9780230523661_1.

[17] Fisher K, Zhang X, Alston M. Shanghai aged care and Confucian welfare. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 2018, 38(9/10): 722-735. DOI: 10.1108/IJSSP-04-2018-0059.

[18] Lee D. The evolution of family policy in South Korea: from Confucian familism to neo-familism. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 2018, 12(1): 46-53. DOI: 10.1111/aswp.12145.

[19] OECD. Pensions at a Glance 2017: OECD and G20 Indicators. OECD Publishing, 2017. DOI: 10.1787/pension_glance-2017-en.

[20] Pierce M, Timonen V. A discussion paper on theories of ageing and approaches to welfare in Ireland, north and south. Dublin: Centre for Ageing Research and Development in Ireland, 2010: 1-52.

[21] Deleuze G. Postscript on the societies of control. 1992, 59: 3–7.

[22] Bovenberg A. The life-course perspective and social policies: an overview of the issues. CESifo Economic Studies, 2008, 54(4): 593-641. DOI: 10.1093/cesifo/ifn033.

[23] Johnson S, Machowski S, Holdsworth L, et al. Age, emotion regulation strategies, burnout, and engagement in the service sector: advantages of older workers. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 2017, 33(3): 205–216. DOI: 10.1016/j.rpto.2017.07.001.

[24] De Wind A, van der Pas S, Blatter B, et al. A life-course perspective on working beyond retirement—results from a longitudinal study in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health, 2016, 16(1): 499. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3174-5.

[25] Tarkar P, Dhamija S, Singh P. Post-retirement work: among academics. Journal of Indian Management, 2017: 67–78.

[26] Browne P, Carr E, Fleischmann M, et al. The relationship between workplace psychosocial environment and retirement intentions and actual retirement: a systematic review. European Journal of Ageing, 2018, 16(1): 73–82. DOI: 10.1007/s10433-018-0498-7.

[27] Sulander J, Sinervo T, Elovainio M, et al. Does organizational justice modify the association between job involvement and retirement intentions of nurses in Finland? Research in Nursing & Health, 2016, 39(5): 364–374.

[28] Oakman J, Wells Y. Working longer: what is the relationship between person-environment fit and retirement intentions? Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 2015, 54(2): 207–229. DOI: 10.1111/1744-7941.12096.

[29] Schreurs B, De Cuyper N, Van Emmerik I, et al. Job demands and resources and their associations with early retirement intentions through recovery need and work enjoyment. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 2011, 37(2): 63–73.

[30] [30] Bennett J, Mohring K. Cumulative (dis)advantage? The impact of labour market policies on late career employment from a life course perspective. Journal of Social Policy, 2015, 44(2): 213–233. DOI: 10.1017/S0047279414000715.

[31] Visser M, Gesthuizen M, Kraaykamp G, et al. Inequality among older workers in the Netherlands: a life-course and social stratification perspective on early retirement. European Sociological Review, 2016, 32(3): 370–382.

[32] Timonen V, Foley G, Conlon C. Challenges when using grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2018, 17(1): 1–10. DOI: 10.1177/1609406918758086.