Author(s)

Li Li

Affiliation(s)

School of Foreign Studies, South China Agricultural University, Guanzhou 510640, Guangdong, China.

Corresponding Author

Li Li

ABSTRACT

This study seeks to optimize the Production-Oriented Approach (POA) by integrating ChatGPT to enhance college English writing instruction. Building on the three stages of POA, a refined instructional model—GUIDE—is proposed, consisting of five stages: Generating, Understanding, Integrating, Designing, and Evaluating. The study further examines the application of this model, highlighting the critical role of ChatGPT in supporting teachers with task design and guiding students in its effective and ethical use. By addressing challenges such as technological dependence and academic integrity, this approach explores potential strategies and provides practical insights that contribute to the advancement of college English writing pedagogy.

KEYWORDS

ChatGPT; College English writing; Teacher-AI-Student framework; POA; GUIDE model

CITE THIS PAPER

Li Li. Empowering college English writing instruction with chatgpt: integration of teacher-ai-student framework and Poa. Trends in Social Sciences and Humanities Research. 2024, 2(12): 48-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/tsshr3125.

REFERENCES

[1] Li Xiaowen, XV Yuanyuan, Zhai Xuesong, et al. Empowering university student development with generative AI: International experiences and China’s pathways. China Distance Education, 2024, 44(12), 36-49. DOI: 10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.2024.12.001.

[2] Strzelecki A. ChatGPT in higher education: Investigating bachelor and master students’ expectations towards AI tool. Education and Information, Technologies, 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-024-13222-9.

[3] Adel A, Ahsan A, Davison C. ChatGPT promises and challenges in education: Computational and ethical perspectives. Education Sciences, 2024, 14(8): 814. DOI: 10.3390/educsci14080814.

[4] Memarian B, Doleck T. ChatGPT in education: Methods, potentials, and limitations. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2023, 1(2): 100022. DOI: 10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100022.

[5] Bouteraa M, Bin-Nashwan S A, Al-Daihani M, et al. Understanding the diffusion of AI-generative (ChatGPT) in higher education: Does students' integrity matter? Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 2024, 14: 100402. DOI: 10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100402.

[6] Wen Qiufang. Theoretical framework and practice of the Production-Oriented Approach. Foreign Language Education Research, 2015, 18(2): 1-10.

[7] Sun Shuguang. An example analysis of the principles of teacher-student collaborative evaluation in the "Production-Oriented Approach." Frontiers in Foreign Language Education Research, 2020, 3(2): 20-27, 90-91.

[8] Zhang Lingli. A study on the teaching effectiveness of the "Production-Oriented Approach." Modern Foreign Languages, 2017, 40(3): 369-376, 438.

[9] Zhang Wenjuan. A self-narrative study of college foreign language teachers applying the "Production-Oriented Approach." Chinese Foreign Languages, 2020, 17(1): 60-67. DOI: 10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2020.01.009.

[10] Wang Haixiao. Exploring the application of generative artificial intelligence in the reform of college English teaching: A case study of teaching reform in the "General Academic English Writing" course. Frontiers in Foreign Language Education and Research, 2024, 7(4): 41-50, 95. DOI: 10.20083/j.cnki.fleic.2024.0036.

[11] Suriano M. Exploring AI in education: Current trends and future possibilities. Journal of Educational Technology, 2024, 30(1): 55-67. 

[12] Aljanahi A M, Alqahtani M A. The role of AI tools in enhancing personalized learning: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2023, 5: 100123. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100123.

[13] Su Yanfang, Lin Yu, Lai Chun. Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2023, 57: 100752. DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2023.100752.

[14] Barrot J S. Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 2023, 57: 100745. DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745.

[15] Essel H B, Vlachopoulos D, Adom D. Generative AI in higher education: Implications for critical thinking and academic integrity. Educational Technology and Society, 2023, 26(3): 45-58. 

[16] Yang Z K, Wang J, Wu D, et al. Exploring the impact of ChatGPT/generative AI on education and response strategies. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences Edition), 2023, 41(7): 26-35. DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2023.07.003.

[17] Chen Mo, Lü Mingchen. College English writing instruction in the ChatGPT environment. Contemporary Foreign Language Studies, 2024(1): 161-168. 

[18] Xu Jiajin, Zhao Chong. Applications of large language models in foreign language teaching and research. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2024.

[19] Wen Qiufang. The Production-Oriented Approach and college English writing instruction. Foreign Language Teaching, 2020, 41(2): 1-6. 

[20] Zhang Wenjuan. An Experimental Study on the Impact of POA on College English Writing. Modern Foreign Languages, 2017, 40(3): 377-385.

[21] Li Dongqing. Human-AI collaborative POA teaching design supported by ChatGPT. Foreign Language Education in China, 2024, 7 (4): 58-64.

[22] Bin-Nashwan S A, Sadallah M, Bouteraa M. Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance. Technology in Society, 2023(75): 102370. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102370.

[23] Pesovski I, Santos R, Henriques R, et al. Generative AI for customizable learning experiences. Sustainability, 2024, 16(7): 3034. DOI: 10.3390/su16073034.

[24] Cotton D R E, Cotton P A, Shipway J R. Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2023, 60(2): 117-128. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148.