Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.
Open Access

ELUCIDATING THE DRIVING FACTORS IN SULFUR TRIOXIDE FORMATION UNDER SIMULATED ACTUAL ULTRA-LOW EMISSION PROCESS

Download as PDF

Volume 3, Issue 2, Pp 27-31, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wjer3026

Author(s)

ZePeng Li1, Yasser M. A. Mohamed2*, YingHui Han1*

Affiliation(s)

1College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China.

2Photochemistry Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, P. O. 12622, Egypt.

Corresponding Author

Yasser M. A. Mohamed, YingHui Han

ABSTRACT

Current flue gas pollution control technologies compliant with ultra-low emission standards exhibit limited effectiveness in removing sulfur trioxide (SO3)—a key condensable particulate matter (CPM) precursor—necessitating high-efficiency, low-consumption control strategies. To address the poorly elucidated formation mechanisms of SO3 across ultra-low emission systems, particularly within the SCR+WFGD process chain, this study employed experimental simulations where SO3 was prepared via the contact process and quantified through controlled condensation coupled with sulfate titration. Catalytic oxidation experiments on cesium-doped V2O5 in a temperature-controlled fixed-bed reactor under simulated actual flue gas revealed reaction temperature as the governing factor for SO3 conversion, achieving peak efficiency at 485–505°C. Whereas SO2 concentration exerted non-dominant effects due to sustained catalytic stability, space velocity proved negligible under high-temperature regimes. These mechanistic insights establish fundamental pathways for developing targeted SO3 mitigation technologies.

KEYWORDS

Sulfur trioxide (SO3); Sulfur dioxide (SO2); Catalytic oxidation; Driving factors; Ultra-low emission

CITE THIS PAPER

ZePeng Li, Yasser M. A. Mohamed, YingHui Han. Elucidating the driving factors in sulfur trioxide formation under simulated actual ultra-low emission process. World Journal of Engineering Research. 2025, 3(2): 27-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wjer3026.

REFERENCES

[1] Luo Hancheng, Pan Weiguo, Ding Honglei, et al. Formation mechanism and control technologies of SO3 in flue gas from coal-fired boilers. Boiler Technology, 2015, 46(6): 69-72.

[2] Cao Yan, Zhou Hongcang, Jiang Wu, et al. Studies of the fate of sulfur trioxide in coal-fired utility boilers based on modified selected condensation methods. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(9): 3429. https://doi.org/10.1021/es903661b

[3] Kikuchi R. Environmental management of sulfur trioxide emission: impact of SO3 on human health. Environmental Management, 2001, 27(6): 837-844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002670010192

[4] Zhong Lijin, Song Yubao. Causes of air preheater blockage in boiler SCR flue gas denitrification and corresponding solutions. Thermal Power Generation, 2012, 41(8): 45-47.

[5] Chang Jingcai, Dong Yong, Wang Zhiqiang, et al. Simulation experiment on SO? conversion and absorption characteristics in coal-fired flue gas. Journal of China Coal Society, 2010(10): 1717-1720

[6] Guo Jingzhi. Progress in sulfuric acid process technology abroad. Chemical Production and Technology, 2003, 10(3).

[7] Han Yinghui, Zhang Junjun, Zhao Yi. Visible-light-induced photocatalytic oxidation of nitric oxide and sulfur dioxide: Discrete kinetic and mechanism. Energy, 2016, 103(15), 725-734

[8] Han Yinghui, Li Xiaolei, Fan Maohong, et al. Abatement of SO2-NOx binary gas mixtures using a ferruginous highly active absorbent: Part I. Synergized effects and mechanism, Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2015, 30(1), 55-64. 

[9] Ahn J, Okerlund R, Fry A, et al. Sulfur trioxide formation during oxy-coal combustion. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2011, 5(12): S127-S135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.05.009

[10] Wang Fangqun, Guo Rong, Sui Jiancai, et al. Detection technologies and applications of SO? in flue gas from thermal power plants. Environmental Engineering, 2008, 26(5): 86-87.

[11] Ran Guangfen, Ma Haizhou. Analysis technologies and application status of sulfate. Journal of Salt Lake Research, 2009, 17(4): 58-62.

[12] Boghosian S, Fehrmann R, Bjerrum N J, et al. Formation of crystalline compounds and catalyst deactivation during SO2 oxidation in V2O5 M2S2O7 (M = Na, K, Cs) melts. Journal of Catalysis, 1989, 20(51): 121-134.

[13] Gu Keren, Li Hangwei. Application of V?O? catalyst in SO? gas production. Hangzhou Chemical Industry, 1997(2): 8-10.

[14] Liu Xin, Zhao Minghui, Liu Dongxu, et al. Boosting catalytic oxidation of H2S over activated carbon optimized by the synergistic effect of rich defects and nitrogen sites. Surface and Interfaces, 2025, 68, 106672.

[15] Zhao Yi, Han Yinghui, Ma Tianzhong, et al. Desulfurization and Denitrification from Flue Gas by Ferrate (VI), Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(9), 4060-4065.

[16] Wang Xin, Duan Rucheng, Li Zhuocan, et al. The critical role of oxygen vacancies in N2O decomposition over cobalt-doped CeO2 catalysts. Environmental Science & Technology. 2025, 59, 11, 5839-5847.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. sitemap
Copyright © 2017 - 2025 Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.   All Rights Reserved.