Author(s)

YuHan Xiao

Affiliation(s)

Management Department, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 200437, China.

Corresponding Author

YuHan Xiao

ABSTRACT

As a foundational core course for economics and management majors, Basic Economics covers core theories including supply and demand, market mechanisms, macroeconomic regulation, and economic growth. It undertakes the dual task of imparting economic theoretical knowledge and shaping students’ correct economic values. From the perspective of Curriculum Ideological and Political Education (CIPE), traditional Basic Economics teaching faces three key issues: the separation of theoretical teaching from ideological guidance, insufficient connection with China’s economic practice, and inadequate response to digital economic challenges. This paper proposes a “three-dimensional integration + four-system promotion” reform framework. Based on the course’s “micro-macro-development” theoretical hierarchy, it systematically integrates ideological elements (such as national conditions awareness, social responsibility, and fairness-efficiency concepts), constructs an “AI+BOPPPS” teaching model adapted to economic scenario simulation, establishes a multi-dimensional evaluation system covering theoretical mastery and value shaping, and strengthens the “school-enterprise-expert-technology” collaborative guarantee mechanism. The aim is to build an educational system centered on “theory as the foundation, practice as the link, and values as the core,” cultivating compound talents who understand economic principles, recognize national conditions, and possess a sense of social responsibility.

KEYWORDS

Basic economics; Curriculum ideological and political education; AI+BOPPPS teaching model; Multi-dimensional evaluation; Collaborative guarantee mechanism

CITE THIS PAPER

YuHan Xiao. Innovative reform paths of basic economics course from the perspective of curriculum ideological and political education. World Journal of Economics and Business Research. 2025, 3(4): 54-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wjebr3068.

REFERENCES

[1] Chen X. Integration of Curriculum Ideological and Political Elements in Basic Economics: Practice and Exploration. Journal of Higher Education Research, 2025, 38(3): 45-52.

[2] Stiglitz J E. People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent. W.W. Norton & Company, New York, USA. 2019.

[3] Zhang H. Connection between Basic Economics and National Economic Strategy: Paths and Cases. Economic Review, 2022, 19(4): 112-118.

[4] Rodrik D. Straight Talk on Trade: Ideas for a Sane World Economy. Princeton University Press, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc779z4.

[5] Li M. Application of AI Technology in Basic Economics Teaching Reform. Journal of Economics and Management, 2024, 21(2): 89-96.

[6] Wang Q. Research on the “AI+BOPPPS” Teaching Model in Basic Economics from the Perspective of CIPE. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching Methodology, 2023, 32(5): 67-73.

[7] National Bureau of Statistics. 2024 China Economic Development Report. China Statistics Press, 2024.

[8] Zhao J. Evaluation System Design of Basic Economics Teaching from the Perspective of CIPE. Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation, 2024, 18(3): 56-63.

[9] Liu Y. Construction of School-Enterprise Collaborative CIPE Mechanism for Basic Economics. Research on Higher Education, 2025, 43(1): 78-85.